Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework

The absence of a generic modeling framework in hydrology has long been recognized. With our current practice of developing more and more complex models for specific individual situations, there is an increasing emphasis and urgency on this issue. There have been some attempts to provide guidelines f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Sivakumar, V. P. Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-11-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/4119/2012/hess-16-4119-2012.pdf
_version_ 1818115028550680576
author B. Sivakumar
V. P. Singh
author_facet B. Sivakumar
V. P. Singh
author_sort B. Sivakumar
collection DOAJ
description The absence of a generic modeling framework in hydrology has long been recognized. With our current practice of developing more and more complex models for specific individual situations, there is an increasing emphasis and urgency on this issue. There have been some attempts to provide guidelines for a catchment classification framework, but research in this area is still in a state of infancy. To move forward on this classification framework, identification of an appropriate basis and development of a suitable methodology for its representation are vital. The present study argues that hydrologic system complexity is an appropriate basis for this classification framework and nonlinear dynamic concepts constitute a suitable methodology. The study employs a popular nonlinear dynamic method for identification of the level of complexity of streamflow and for its classification. The correlation dimension method, which has its base on data reconstruction and nearest neighbor concepts, is applied to monthly streamflow time series from a large network of 117 gaging stations across 11 states in the western United States (US). The dimensionality of the time series forms the basis for identification of system complexity and, accordingly, streamflows are classified into four major categories: low-dimensional, medium-dimensional, high-dimensional, and unidentifiable. The dimension estimates show some "homogeneity" in flow complexity within certain regions of the western US, but there are also strong exceptions.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:00:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af72c739024544e08f5262bb05530889
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:00:06Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-af72c739024544e08f5262bb055308892022-12-22T01:21:40ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382012-11-0116114119413110.5194/hess-16-4119-2012Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification frameworkB. SivakumarV. P. SinghThe absence of a generic modeling framework in hydrology has long been recognized. With our current practice of developing more and more complex models for specific individual situations, there is an increasing emphasis and urgency on this issue. There have been some attempts to provide guidelines for a catchment classification framework, but research in this area is still in a state of infancy. To move forward on this classification framework, identification of an appropriate basis and development of a suitable methodology for its representation are vital. The present study argues that hydrologic system complexity is an appropriate basis for this classification framework and nonlinear dynamic concepts constitute a suitable methodology. The study employs a popular nonlinear dynamic method for identification of the level of complexity of streamflow and for its classification. The correlation dimension method, which has its base on data reconstruction and nearest neighbor concepts, is applied to monthly streamflow time series from a large network of 117 gaging stations across 11 states in the western United States (US). The dimensionality of the time series forms the basis for identification of system complexity and, accordingly, streamflows are classified into four major categories: low-dimensional, medium-dimensional, high-dimensional, and unidentifiable. The dimension estimates show some "homogeneity" in flow complexity within certain regions of the western US, but there are also strong exceptions.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/4119/2012/hess-16-4119-2012.pdf
spellingShingle B. Sivakumar
V. P. Singh
Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
title_full Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
title_fullStr Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
title_full_unstemmed Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
title_short Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
title_sort hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/4119/2012/hess-16-4119-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bsivakumar hydrologicsystemcomplexityandnonlineardynamicconceptsforacatchmentclassificationframework
AT vpsingh hydrologicsystemcomplexityandnonlineardynamicconceptsforacatchmentclassificationframework