Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program

Background and study aims In an optical diagnosis strategy, diminutive polyps that are endoscopically characterized with high confidence are removed without histopathological analysis and distal hyperplastic polyps are left in situ. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of optical diagnosis....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jasper L. A. Vleugels, Marjolein J. E. Greuter, Yark Hazewinkel, Veerle M. H. Coupé, Evelien Dekker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-11-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-113565
_version_ 1819049656752013312
author Jasper L. A. Vleugels
Marjolein J. E. Greuter
Yark Hazewinkel
Veerle M. H. Coupé
Evelien Dekker
author_facet Jasper L. A. Vleugels
Marjolein J. E. Greuter
Yark Hazewinkel
Veerle M. H. Coupé
Evelien Dekker
author_sort Jasper L. A. Vleugels
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims In an optical diagnosis strategy, diminutive polyps that are endoscopically characterized with high confidence are removed without histopathological analysis and distal hyperplastic polyps are left in situ. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of optical diagnosis. Methods Using the Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer (ASCCA) model, we simulated biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening in individuals aged 55 – 75 years. In this program, we compared an optical diagnosis strategy with current histopathology assessment of all diminutive polyps. Base-case assumptions included 76 % high-confidence predictions and sensitivities of 88 %, 91 %, and 88 % for endoscopically characterizing adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and hyperplastic polyps, respectively. Outcomes were colorectal cancer burden, number of colonoscopies, life-years, and costs. Results Both the histopathology strategy and the optical diagnosis strategy resulted in 21 life-days gained per simulated individual compared with no screening. For optical diagnosis, €6 per individual was saved compared with the current histopathology strategy. These cost savings were related to a 31 % reduction in colonoscopies in which histopathology was needed for diminutive polyps. Projecting these results onto the Netherlands (17 million inhabitants), assuming a fully implemented FIT-based screening program, resulted in an annual undiscounted cost saving of € 1.7 – 2.2 million for optical diagnosis. Conclusion Implementation of optical diagnosis in a FIT-based screening program saves costs without decreasing program effectiveness when compared with current histopathology analysis of all diminutive polyps. Further work is required to evaluate how endoscopists participating in a screening program should be trained, audited, and monitored to achieve adequate competence in optical diagnosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T11:35:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af8515ca5ba04dc8bf09acc453eaebcf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T11:35:37Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-af8515ca5ba04dc8bf09acc453eaebcf2022-12-21T19:05:28ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362017-11-010512E1197E120710.1055/s-0043-113565Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programJasper L. A. Vleugels0Marjolein J. E. Greuter1Yark Hazewinkel2Veerle M. H. Coupé3Evelien Dekker4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsBackground and study aims In an optical diagnosis strategy, diminutive polyps that are endoscopically characterized with high confidence are removed without histopathological analysis and distal hyperplastic polyps are left in situ. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of optical diagnosis. Methods Using the Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer (ASCCA) model, we simulated biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening in individuals aged 55 – 75 years. In this program, we compared an optical diagnosis strategy with current histopathology assessment of all diminutive polyps. Base-case assumptions included 76 % high-confidence predictions and sensitivities of 88 %, 91 %, and 88 % for endoscopically characterizing adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and hyperplastic polyps, respectively. Outcomes were colorectal cancer burden, number of colonoscopies, life-years, and costs. Results Both the histopathology strategy and the optical diagnosis strategy resulted in 21 life-days gained per simulated individual compared with no screening. For optical diagnosis, €6 per individual was saved compared with the current histopathology strategy. These cost savings were related to a 31 % reduction in colonoscopies in which histopathology was needed for diminutive polyps. Projecting these results onto the Netherlands (17 million inhabitants), assuming a fully implemented FIT-based screening program, resulted in an annual undiscounted cost saving of € 1.7 – 2.2 million for optical diagnosis. Conclusion Implementation of optical diagnosis in a FIT-based screening program saves costs without decreasing program effectiveness when compared with current histopathology analysis of all diminutive polyps. Further work is required to evaluate how endoscopists participating in a screening program should be trained, audited, and monitored to achieve adequate competence in optical diagnosis.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-113565
spellingShingle Jasper L. A. Vleugels
Marjolein J. E. Greuter
Yark Hazewinkel
Veerle M. H. Coupé
Evelien Dekker
Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
Endoscopy International Open
title Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_full Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_fullStr Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_short Implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program
title_sort implementation of an optical diagnosis strategy saves costs and does not impair clinical outcomes of a fecal immunochemical test based colorectal cancer screening program
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-113565
work_keys_str_mv AT jasperlavleugels implementationofanopticaldiagnosisstrategysavescostsanddoesnotimpairclinicaloutcomesofafecalimmunochemicaltestbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT marjoleinjegreuter implementationofanopticaldiagnosisstrategysavescostsanddoesnotimpairclinicaloutcomesofafecalimmunochemicaltestbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT yarkhazewinkel implementationofanopticaldiagnosisstrategysavescostsanddoesnotimpairclinicaloutcomesofafecalimmunochemicaltestbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT veerlemhcoupe implementationofanopticaldiagnosisstrategysavescostsanddoesnotimpairclinicaloutcomesofafecalimmunochemicaltestbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram
AT eveliendekker implementationofanopticaldiagnosisstrategysavescostsanddoesnotimpairclinicaloutcomesofafecalimmunochemicaltestbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogram