Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment

When speech is clear, speech understanding is a relatively simple and automatic process. However, when the acoustic signal is degraded, top-down cognitive and linguistic abilities, such as working memory capacity, lexical knowledge (i.e., vocabulary), inhibitory control, and processing speed can oft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew M. Burleson, Pamela E. Souza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059192/full
_version_ 1811185754472185856
author Andrew M. Burleson
Pamela E. Souza
author_facet Andrew M. Burleson
Pamela E. Souza
author_sort Andrew M. Burleson
collection DOAJ
description When speech is clear, speech understanding is a relatively simple and automatic process. However, when the acoustic signal is degraded, top-down cognitive and linguistic abilities, such as working memory capacity, lexical knowledge (i.e., vocabulary), inhibitory control, and processing speed can often support speech understanding. This study examined whether listeners aged 22–63 (mean age 42 years) with better cognitive and linguistic abilities would be better able to perceptually restore missing speech information than those with poorer scores. Additionally, the role of context and everyday speech was investigated using high-context, low-context, and realistic speech corpi to explore these effects. Sixty-three adult participants with self-reported normal hearing completed a short cognitive and linguistic battery before listening to sentences interrupted by silent gaps or noise bursts. Results indicated that working memory was the most reliable predictor of perceptual restoration ability, followed by lexical knowledge, and inhibitory control and processing speed. Generally, silent gap conditions were related to and predicted by a broader range of cognitive abilities, whereas noise burst conditions were related to working memory capacity and inhibitory control. These findings suggest that higher-order cognitive and linguistic abilities facilitate the top-down restoration of missing speech information and contribute to individual variability in perceptual restoration.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:34:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af85bfd09066424281a7dca670a87237
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:34:35Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-af85bfd09066424281a7dca670a872372022-12-22T04:21:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-12-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.10591921059192Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessmentAndrew M. BurlesonPamela E. SouzaWhen speech is clear, speech understanding is a relatively simple and automatic process. However, when the acoustic signal is degraded, top-down cognitive and linguistic abilities, such as working memory capacity, lexical knowledge (i.e., vocabulary), inhibitory control, and processing speed can often support speech understanding. This study examined whether listeners aged 22–63 (mean age 42 years) with better cognitive and linguistic abilities would be better able to perceptually restore missing speech information than those with poorer scores. Additionally, the role of context and everyday speech was investigated using high-context, low-context, and realistic speech corpi to explore these effects. Sixty-three adult participants with self-reported normal hearing completed a short cognitive and linguistic battery before listening to sentences interrupted by silent gaps or noise bursts. Results indicated that working memory was the most reliable predictor of perceptual restoration ability, followed by lexical knowledge, and inhibitory control and processing speed. Generally, silent gap conditions were related to and predicted by a broader range of cognitive abilities, whereas noise burst conditions were related to working memory capacity and inhibitory control. These findings suggest that higher-order cognitive and linguistic abilities facilitate the top-down restoration of missing speech information and contribute to individual variability in perceptual restoration.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059192/fullperceptual restorationinterrupted speechcognitionlinguisticonline assessment
spellingShingle Andrew M. Burleson
Pamela E. Souza
Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
Frontiers in Psychology
perceptual restoration
interrupted speech
cognition
linguistic
online assessment
title Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
title_full Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
title_fullStr Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
title_short Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment
title_sort cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech evidence from online assessment
topic perceptual restoration
interrupted speech
cognition
linguistic
online assessment
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059192/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmburleson cognitiveandlinguisticabilitiesandperceptualrestorationofmissingspeechevidencefromonlineassessment
AT pamelaesouza cognitiveandlinguisticabilitiesandperceptualrestorationofmissingspeechevidencefromonlineassessment