The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy

PurposeOur purpose was to investigate the influence of atlas library size and CT cross-slice number on the accuracy and efficiency of the atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) method for the automatic contouring of clinical treatment volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) during cervical cancer radio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Li, Wenjing Wu, Yuchen Sun, Dequan Yu, Yuemei Zhang, Long Wang, Yao Wang, Xiaozhi Zhang, Yongkai Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.945053/full
_version_ 1818013713163091968
author Yi Li
Wenjing Wu
Yuchen Sun
Dequan Yu
Yuemei Zhang
Long Wang
Yao Wang
Xiaozhi Zhang
Yongkai Lu
author_facet Yi Li
Wenjing Wu
Yuchen Sun
Dequan Yu
Yuemei Zhang
Long Wang
Yao Wang
Xiaozhi Zhang
Yongkai Lu
author_sort Yi Li
collection DOAJ
description PurposeOur purpose was to investigate the influence of atlas library size and CT cross-slice number on the accuracy and efficiency of the atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) method for the automatic contouring of clinical treatment volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) during cervical cancer radiotherapy.MethodsOf 140 cervical cancer patients, contours from 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 patients were selected incrementally to create six atlas library groups in ABAS. Another 20 tested patients were automatically contoured with the ABAS method and manually contoured by the same professional oncologist. Contours included CTV, bladder, rectum, femoral head-L, femoral head-R, and spinal cord. The CT cross-slice numbers of the 20 tested patients included 61, 65, 72, 75, 81, and 84. The index of dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess the consistency between ABAS automatic contouring and manual contouring. The randomized block analysis of variance and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe mean DSC values of “CTV, bladder, femoral head, and spinal cord” were all larger than 0.8. The femoral head and spinal cord showed a high degree of agreement between ABAS automatic contouring and manual contouring, with a mean DC >0.80 and HD <1 cm in all atlas library groups. A post-hoc least significant difference comparison indicated that no significant difference had been found between different atlas library sizes with DSC and HD values. For ABAS efficiency, the atlas library size had no effect on the time of ABAS automatic contouring. The time of automatic contouring increased slightly with the increase in CT cross-slice numbers, which were 99.9, 106.8, 114.0, 120.6, 127.9, and 134.8 s with CT cross-slices of 61, 65, 72, 75, 81, and 84, respectively.ConclusionA total of 20 atlas library sizes and a minimum CT cross-slice number including CTV and OARs are enough for ensuring the accuracy and efficiency of ABAS automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:36:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af90a8675d8543b69833170ddd9b3eef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:36:41Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-af90a8675d8543b69833170ddd9b3eef2022-12-22T02:07:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-08-011210.3389/fonc.2022.945053945053The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapyYi Li0Wenjing Wu1Yuchen Sun2Dequan Yu3Yuemei Zhang4Long Wang5Yao Wang6Xiaozhi Zhang7Yongkai Lu8Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiological Health, Xi’an Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaPurposeOur purpose was to investigate the influence of atlas library size and CT cross-slice number on the accuracy and efficiency of the atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) method for the automatic contouring of clinical treatment volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) during cervical cancer radiotherapy.MethodsOf 140 cervical cancer patients, contours from 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 patients were selected incrementally to create six atlas library groups in ABAS. Another 20 tested patients were automatically contoured with the ABAS method and manually contoured by the same professional oncologist. Contours included CTV, bladder, rectum, femoral head-L, femoral head-R, and spinal cord. The CT cross-slice numbers of the 20 tested patients included 61, 65, 72, 75, 81, and 84. The index of dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess the consistency between ABAS automatic contouring and manual contouring. The randomized block analysis of variance and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe mean DSC values of “CTV, bladder, femoral head, and spinal cord” were all larger than 0.8. The femoral head and spinal cord showed a high degree of agreement between ABAS automatic contouring and manual contouring, with a mean DC >0.80 and HD <1 cm in all atlas library groups. A post-hoc least significant difference comparison indicated that no significant difference had been found between different atlas library sizes with DSC and HD values. For ABAS efficiency, the atlas library size had no effect on the time of ABAS automatic contouring. The time of automatic contouring increased slightly with the increase in CT cross-slice numbers, which were 99.9, 106.8, 114.0, 120.6, 127.9, and 134.8 s with CT cross-slices of 61, 65, 72, 75, 81, and 84, respectively.ConclusionA total of 20 atlas library sizes and a minimum CT cross-slice number including CTV and OARs are enough for ensuring the accuracy and efficiency of ABAS automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.945053/fullatlasauto-segmentationautomatic contouringcervical cancerradiotherapy
spellingShingle Yi Li
Wenjing Wu
Yuchen Sun
Dequan Yu
Yuemei Zhang
Long Wang
Yao Wang
Xiaozhi Zhang
Yongkai Lu
The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
Frontiers in Oncology
atlas
auto-segmentation
automatic contouring
cervical cancer
radiotherapy
title The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
title_full The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
title_short The clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
title_sort clinical evaluation of atlas based auto segmentation for automatic contouring during cervical cancer radiotherapy
topic atlas
auto-segmentation
automatic contouring
cervical cancer
radiotherapy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.945053/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yili theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT wenjingwu theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yuchensun theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT dequanyu theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yuemeizhang theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT longwang theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yaowang theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT xiaozhizhang theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yongkailu theclinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yili clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT wenjingwu clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yuchensun clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT dequanyu clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yuemeizhang clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT longwang clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yaowang clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT xiaozhizhang clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy
AT yongkailu clinicalevaluationofatlasbasedautosegmentationforautomaticcontouringduringcervicalcancerradiotherapy