Moet ons die Belydenis van belhar (1986) as 'n nuwe Belydenisskrif aanvaar?
Can� we� accept� the� Confession� of Belhar� (1986)� as� a� new� doctrinal confession? The possibility exists that the Dutch Refonned Church� (DRC)� could stop the process of� church� unity� in� its� own family� due� to� its� refusal� to� accept The Confession 1986 (Confession of� Belhar) as afo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
AOSIS
1996-04-01
|
| Series: | Verbum et Ecclesia |
| Online Access: | http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/530 |
| Summary: | Can� we� accept� the� Confession� of Belhar� (1986)� as� a� new� doctrinal confession? The possibility exists that the Dutch Refonned Church� (DRC)� could stop the process of� church� unity� in� its� own family� due� to� its� refusal� to� accept The Confession 1986 (Confession of� Belhar) as afourth refonned confession.� In this� article� the� question� of� acceptance� is� examined from four perspectives and� it� is� concluded� that� it should be� accepted� if� the DRC wants� to� gain credibility.� First� the� nature,� characteristics� and� history� of confessions oblige the Church� in difficult situations� to adopt new confessions.� Secondly the history of� the DRC and its family makes� it� imperative� to� overcome� the gulf between� believers from� the� same� tradition� through� the� "language� of confession".� Thirdly� the main� contents of� the� confession� is biblically sound while absolutism� of� different kinds� is� avoided.� Lastly� it� is� argued� that� the confession� satisfies� the� requirement� for� both� contextual� relevance� and universal applicability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1609-9982 2074-7705 |