Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production

The amount of inputs and dry matter yields of grain, stover and weeds were quantifi ed in six sites located in the districts of Zaachila and Etla, in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca Region, México. The tillage systems evaluated, which are the most widely used for corn production in this region, were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaime Ruiz-Vega, Niurka Mena-Mesa, Fidel Diego-Nava, Miguel Herrera-Suárez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Antioquia 2015-09-01
Series:Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/19162
_version_ 1797861778452905984
author Jaime Ruiz-Vega
Niurka Mena-Mesa
Fidel Diego-Nava
Miguel Herrera-Suárez
author_facet Jaime Ruiz-Vega
Niurka Mena-Mesa
Fidel Diego-Nava
Miguel Herrera-Suárez
author_sort Jaime Ruiz-Vega
collection DOAJ
description The amount of inputs and dry matter yields of grain, stover and weeds were quantifi ed in six sites located in the districts of Zaachila and Etla, in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca Region, México. The tillage systems evaluated, which are the most widely used for corn production in this region, were full animal traction (FAT), mixed traction (MXT) and mechanical traction (MT). The higher productivity was achieved in the MT system, followed by the MxT system. According to the energy balance, the largest energy effi ciency (EE) was achieved in the FAT system with a value of 34.4 and the least one with the MT system. The lowest EE of the MT system was associated to a higher use of machinery operations and the use of petrol derivate products. No signifi cant differences in EE were found between the FAT and MxT systems; when the weed’s dry matter production was considered, EE in this last system was increased 14%, while in the FAT system an 8% increase was observed. Therefore, besides the FAT system, MxT is also recommended because it is common to have plots smaller than 1 ha in the region and mechanical plowing is more effi cient for primary tillage operations, while animal power can be used as a renewable source of energy for tasks such as weeding and transport.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:09:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afa03e6cc3db4aa783a8e266b8c0ca3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0120-6230
2422-2844
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:09:53Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Universidad de Antioquia
record_format Article
series Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia
spelling doaj.art-afa03e6cc3db4aa783a8e266b8c0ca3c2023-03-23T12:31:00ZengUniversidad de AntioquiaRevista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia0120-62302422-28442015-09-017610.17533/udea.redin.n76a08Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) productionJaime Ruiz-Vega0Niurka Mena-Mesa1Fidel Diego-Nava2Miguel Herrera-Suárez3National Polytechnic InstituteUniversity of Ciego de AvilaNational Polytechnic InstituteAgrarian University of Havana The amount of inputs and dry matter yields of grain, stover and weeds were quantifi ed in six sites located in the districts of Zaachila and Etla, in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca Region, México. The tillage systems evaluated, which are the most widely used for corn production in this region, were full animal traction (FAT), mixed traction (MXT) and mechanical traction (MT). The higher productivity was achieved in the MT system, followed by the MxT system. According to the energy balance, the largest energy effi ciency (EE) was achieved in the FAT system with a value of 34.4 and the least one with the MT system. The lowest EE of the MT system was associated to a higher use of machinery operations and the use of petrol derivate products. No signifi cant differences in EE were found between the FAT and MxT systems; when the weed’s dry matter production was considered, EE in this last system was increased 14%, while in the FAT system an 8% increase was observed. Therefore, besides the FAT system, MxT is also recommended because it is common to have plots smaller than 1 ha in the region and mechanical plowing is more effi cient for primary tillage operations, while animal power can be used as a renewable source of energy for tasks such as weeding and transport. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/19162animal tractionmechanized tractionsustainabilityrain-fed agriculture
spellingShingle Jaime Ruiz-Vega
Niurka Mena-Mesa
Fidel Diego-Nava
Miguel Herrera-Suárez
Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia
animal traction
mechanized traction
sustainability
rain-fed agriculture
title Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
title_full Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
title_fullStr Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
title_full_unstemmed Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
title_short Productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize (Zea mayz L.) production
title_sort productivity and energy efficiency of three tillage systems for maize zea mayz l production
topic animal traction
mechanized traction
sustainability
rain-fed agriculture
url https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/19162
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimeruizvega productivityandenergyefficiencyofthreetillagesystemsformaizezeamayzlproduction
AT niurkamenamesa productivityandenergyefficiencyofthreetillagesystemsformaizezeamayzlproduction
AT fideldiegonava productivityandenergyefficiencyofthreetillagesystemsformaizezeamayzlproduction
AT miguelherrerasuarez productivityandenergyefficiencyofthreetillagesystemsformaizezeamayzlproduction