Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Objective This study assessed patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) to better understand how living with aPL may affect their quality of life. Methods Patients completed Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia K. Weiner, Tristin Smith, Claire K. Hoy, Cyrus Sarosh, Jacqueline A. Madison, Amala Ambati, Ajay Tambralli, Noah Peters, Corinne Packel, Kelsey Gockman, Yu Zuo, Emily M. Briceño, Vivek Nagaraja, Jason S. Knight
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:ACR Open Rheumatology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11512
_version_ 1828065284747952128
author Julia K. Weiner
Tristin Smith
Claire K. Hoy
Cyrus Sarosh
Jacqueline A. Madison
Amala Ambati
Ajay Tambralli
Noah Peters
Corinne Packel
Kelsey Gockman
Yu Zuo
Emily M. Briceño
Vivek Nagaraja
Jason S. Knight
author_facet Julia K. Weiner
Tristin Smith
Claire K. Hoy
Cyrus Sarosh
Jacqueline A. Madison
Amala Ambati
Ajay Tambralli
Noah Peters
Corinne Packel
Kelsey Gockman
Yu Zuo
Emily M. Briceño
Vivek Nagaraja
Jason S. Knight
author_sort Julia K. Weiner
collection DOAJ
description Objective This study assessed patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) to better understand how living with aPL may affect their quality of life. Methods Patients completed Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PF) and Cognitive Function (CF) Short Forms as well as the pain intensity (PI) rating (scale of 1‐10). Patients were characterized for demographics, clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory test results, and medication usage. Multivariate modeling was done via linear regression. Results Of 139 patients, 89 had primary APS, 21 had secondary APS, and 29 had persistent aPL without meeting clinical criteria for APS. The average T scores (±SD) for PF and CF were 45.4 ± 9.2 and 48.6 ± 11.6, respectively; the average for PI was 3.0 ± 2.6. Approximately half of the patients (47%) endorsed at least mild impairment in PF (T score < 45). Mean PF, CF, and PI did not differ between diagnostic groups. Individuals who endorsed more impairment on one measure also tended to endorse more impairment on another (Pearson r = 0.43‐0.59). In the multivariate models, age, smoking, pain medications, and serotonergic medications were associated with impairment in at least one PRO domain. The Damage Index for APS was significantly correlated with both PF and CF. Conclusion Individuals living with APS endorsed more impairment in PF (and potentially CF) than expected for the general population. The relationship between certain medications and PROs warrants further study, as does the longitudinal trajectory of these and other PROs.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:11:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afbc614d5f5c4be4be20f4182afb0293
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2578-5745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:11:25Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ACR Open Rheumatology
spelling doaj.art-afbc614d5f5c4be4be20f4182afb02932023-01-13T05:31:29ZengWileyACR Open Rheumatology2578-57452023-01-0151283710.1002/acr2.11512Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional StudyJulia K. Weiner0Tristin Smith1Claire K. Hoy2Cyrus Sarosh3Jacqueline A. Madison4Amala Ambati5Ajay Tambralli6Noah Peters7Corinne Packel8Kelsey Gockman9Yu Zuo10Emily M. Briceño11Vivek Nagaraja12Jason S. Knight13University of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale ArizonaUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor MichiganObjective This study assessed patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) to better understand how living with aPL may affect their quality of life. Methods Patients completed Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PF) and Cognitive Function (CF) Short Forms as well as the pain intensity (PI) rating (scale of 1‐10). Patients were characterized for demographics, clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory test results, and medication usage. Multivariate modeling was done via linear regression. Results Of 139 patients, 89 had primary APS, 21 had secondary APS, and 29 had persistent aPL without meeting clinical criteria for APS. The average T scores (±SD) for PF and CF were 45.4 ± 9.2 and 48.6 ± 11.6, respectively; the average for PI was 3.0 ± 2.6. Approximately half of the patients (47%) endorsed at least mild impairment in PF (T score < 45). Mean PF, CF, and PI did not differ between diagnostic groups. Individuals who endorsed more impairment on one measure also tended to endorse more impairment on another (Pearson r = 0.43‐0.59). In the multivariate models, age, smoking, pain medications, and serotonergic medications were associated with impairment in at least one PRO domain. The Damage Index for APS was significantly correlated with both PF and CF. Conclusion Individuals living with APS endorsed more impairment in PF (and potentially CF) than expected for the general population. The relationship between certain medications and PROs warrants further study, as does the longitudinal trajectory of these and other PROs.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11512
spellingShingle Julia K. Weiner
Tristin Smith
Claire K. Hoy
Cyrus Sarosh
Jacqueline A. Madison
Amala Ambati
Ajay Tambralli
Noah Peters
Corinne Packel
Kelsey Gockman
Yu Zuo
Emily M. Briceño
Vivek Nagaraja
Jason S. Knight
Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
ACR Open Rheumatology
title Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_fullStr Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_short Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_sort predictors and interrelationship of patient reported outcomes in antiphospholipid syndrome a cross sectional study
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11512
work_keys_str_mv AT juliakweiner predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT tristinsmith predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT clairekhoy predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT cyrussarosh predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT jacquelineamadison predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT amalaambati predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT ajaytambralli predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT noahpeters predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT corinnepackel predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT kelseygockman predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT yuzuo predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT emilymbriceno predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT viveknagaraja predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT jasonsknight predictorsandinterrelationshipofpatientreportedoutcomesinantiphospholipidsyndromeacrosssectionalstudy