A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut

The advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ka-Wing Cheng, Yinghu Peng, Tony Lin-Wei Chen, Guoxin Zhang, James Chung-Wai Cheung, Wing-Kai Lam, Duo Wai-Chi Wong, Ming Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297
_version_ 1797518392746311680
author Ka-Wing Cheng
Yinghu Peng
Tony Lin-Wei Chen
Guoxin Zhang
James Chung-Wai Cheung
Wing-Kai Lam
Duo Wai-Chi Wong
Ming Zhang
author_facet Ka-Wing Cheng
Yinghu Peng
Tony Lin-Wei Chen
Guoxin Zhang
James Chung-Wai Cheung
Wing-Kai Lam
Duo Wai-Chi Wong
Ming Zhang
author_sort Ka-Wing Cheng
collection DOAJ
description The advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at two design rectification features (arch stiffness and arch height) using three sets of customized 3D-printed arch support insoles (R+U+, R+U−, and R−U+). The arch support stiffness could be with or without reinforcement (R+/−) and the arch height may or may not have an additional elevation, undercutting (U+/−), which were compared to the control (no insole). Ten collegiate participants (four males and six females) with flexible flatfoot were recruited for gait analysis on foot kinematics, vertical ground reaction force, and plantar pressure parameters. A randomized crossover trial was conducted on the four conditions and analyzed using the Friedman test with pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Compared to the control, there were significant increases in peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak pressure at the medial midfoot region, accompanied by a significant reduction in peak pressure at the hindfoot region for the insole conditions. In addition, the insoles tended to control hindfoot eversion and forefoot abduction though the effects were not significant. An insole with stronger support features (R+U+) did not necessarily produce more favorable outcomes, probably due to over-cutting or impingement. The outcome of this study provides additional data to assist the design rectification process. Future studies should consider a larger sample size with stratified flatfoot features and covariating ankle flexibility while incorporating more design features, particularly medial insole postings.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:29:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afbd32c3d03745f18192944dbe15976a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:29:14Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-afbd32c3d03745f18192944dbe15976a2023-11-22T14:01:58ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-09-011418529710.3390/ma14185297A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and UndercutKa-Wing Cheng0Yinghu Peng1Tony Lin-Wei Chen2Guoxin Zhang3James Chung-Wai Cheung4Wing-Kai Lam5Duo Wai-Chi Wong6Ming Zhang7Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Sports Assistive Devices, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510000, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaThe advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at two design rectification features (arch stiffness and arch height) using three sets of customized 3D-printed arch support insoles (R+U+, R+U−, and R−U+). The arch support stiffness could be with or without reinforcement (R+/−) and the arch height may or may not have an additional elevation, undercutting (U+/−), which were compared to the control (no insole). Ten collegiate participants (four males and six females) with flexible flatfoot were recruited for gait analysis on foot kinematics, vertical ground reaction force, and plantar pressure parameters. A randomized crossover trial was conducted on the four conditions and analyzed using the Friedman test with pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Compared to the control, there were significant increases in peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak pressure at the medial midfoot region, accompanied by a significant reduction in peak pressure at the hindfoot region for the insole conditions. In addition, the insoles tended to control hindfoot eversion and forefoot abduction though the effects were not significant. An insole with stronger support features (R+U+) did not necessarily produce more favorable outcomes, probably due to over-cutting or impingement. The outcome of this study provides additional data to assist the design rectification process. Future studies should consider a larger sample size with stratified flatfoot features and covariating ankle flexibility while incorporating more design features, particularly medial insole postings.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297pes planuspes planovalgusflexible flatfootpronationcustomized insolekinematics
spellingShingle Ka-Wing Cheng
Yinghu Peng
Tony Lin-Wei Chen
Guoxin Zhang
James Chung-Wai Cheung
Wing-Kai Lam
Duo Wai-Chi Wong
Ming Zhang
A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
Materials
pes planus
pes planovalgus
flexible flatfoot
pronation
customized insole
kinematics
title A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
title_full A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
title_fullStr A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
title_full_unstemmed A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
title_short A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
title_sort three dimensional printed foot orthosis for flexible flatfoot an exploratory biomechanical study on arch support reinforcement and undercut
topic pes planus
pes planovalgus
flexible flatfoot
pronation
customized insole
kinematics
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297
work_keys_str_mv AT kawingcheng athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT yinghupeng athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT tonylinweichen athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT guoxinzhang athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT jameschungwaicheung athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT wingkailam athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT duowaichiwong athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT mingzhang athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT kawingcheng threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT yinghupeng threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT tonylinweichen threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT guoxinzhang threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT jameschungwaicheung threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT wingkailam threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT duowaichiwong threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut
AT mingzhang threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut