A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut
The advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297 |
_version_ | 1797518392746311680 |
---|---|
author | Ka-Wing Cheng Yinghu Peng Tony Lin-Wei Chen Guoxin Zhang James Chung-Wai Cheung Wing-Kai Lam Duo Wai-Chi Wong Ming Zhang |
author_facet | Ka-Wing Cheng Yinghu Peng Tony Lin-Wei Chen Guoxin Zhang James Chung-Wai Cheung Wing-Kai Lam Duo Wai-Chi Wong Ming Zhang |
author_sort | Ka-Wing Cheng |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at two design rectification features (arch stiffness and arch height) using three sets of customized 3D-printed arch support insoles (R+U+, R+U−, and R−U+). The arch support stiffness could be with or without reinforcement (R+/−) and the arch height may or may not have an additional elevation, undercutting (U+/−), which were compared to the control (no insole). Ten collegiate participants (four males and six females) with flexible flatfoot were recruited for gait analysis on foot kinematics, vertical ground reaction force, and plantar pressure parameters. A randomized crossover trial was conducted on the four conditions and analyzed using the Friedman test with pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Compared to the control, there were significant increases in peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak pressure at the medial midfoot region, accompanied by a significant reduction in peak pressure at the hindfoot region for the insole conditions. In addition, the insoles tended to control hindfoot eversion and forefoot abduction though the effects were not significant. An insole with stronger support features (R+U+) did not necessarily produce more favorable outcomes, probably due to over-cutting or impingement. The outcome of this study provides additional data to assist the design rectification process. Future studies should consider a larger sample size with stratified flatfoot features and covariating ankle flexibility while incorporating more design features, particularly medial insole postings. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:29:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-afbd32c3d03745f18192944dbe15976a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1944 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:29:14Z |
publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Materials |
spelling | doaj.art-afbd32c3d03745f18192944dbe15976a2023-11-22T14:01:58ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-09-011418529710.3390/ma14185297A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and UndercutKa-Wing Cheng0Yinghu Peng1Tony Lin-Wei Chen2Guoxin Zhang3James Chung-Wai Cheung4Wing-Kai Lam5Duo Wai-Chi Wong6Ming Zhang7Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Sports Assistive Devices, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510000, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaThe advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at two design rectification features (arch stiffness and arch height) using three sets of customized 3D-printed arch support insoles (R+U+, R+U−, and R−U+). The arch support stiffness could be with or without reinforcement (R+/−) and the arch height may or may not have an additional elevation, undercutting (U+/−), which were compared to the control (no insole). Ten collegiate participants (four males and six females) with flexible flatfoot were recruited for gait analysis on foot kinematics, vertical ground reaction force, and plantar pressure parameters. A randomized crossover trial was conducted on the four conditions and analyzed using the Friedman test with pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Compared to the control, there were significant increases in peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak pressure at the medial midfoot region, accompanied by a significant reduction in peak pressure at the hindfoot region for the insole conditions. In addition, the insoles tended to control hindfoot eversion and forefoot abduction though the effects were not significant. An insole with stronger support features (R+U+) did not necessarily produce more favorable outcomes, probably due to over-cutting or impingement. The outcome of this study provides additional data to assist the design rectification process. Future studies should consider a larger sample size with stratified flatfoot features and covariating ankle flexibility while incorporating more design features, particularly medial insole postings.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297pes planuspes planovalgusflexible flatfootpronationcustomized insolekinematics |
spellingShingle | Ka-Wing Cheng Yinghu Peng Tony Lin-Wei Chen Guoxin Zhang James Chung-Wai Cheung Wing-Kai Lam Duo Wai-Chi Wong Ming Zhang A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut Materials pes planus pes planovalgus flexible flatfoot pronation customized insole kinematics |
title | A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut |
title_full | A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut |
title_fullStr | A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut |
title_full_unstemmed | A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut |
title_short | A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut |
title_sort | three dimensional printed foot orthosis for flexible flatfoot an exploratory biomechanical study on arch support reinforcement and undercut |
topic | pes planus pes planovalgus flexible flatfoot pronation customized insole kinematics |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/18/5297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawingcheng athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT yinghupeng athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT tonylinweichen athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT guoxinzhang athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT jameschungwaicheung athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT wingkailam athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT duowaichiwong athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT mingzhang athreedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT kawingcheng threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT yinghupeng threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT tonylinweichen threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT guoxinzhang threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT jameschungwaicheung threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT wingkailam threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT duowaichiwong threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut AT mingzhang threedimensionalprintedfootorthosisforflexibleflatfootanexploratorybiomechanicalstudyonarchsupportreinforcementandundercut |