Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects

Current studies on blasting construction of small clear-distance tunnels have not considered the impact of existing tunnel lining defects when establishing safety controls. This paper offers a series of study results based on the blasting project of a new tunnel adjacent to the existing defect Xinli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junying Xia, Bo Wang, Xinxin Guo, Zhuoxiong Xie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2024-04-01
Series:Underground Space
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967423001289
_version_ 1797377859262611456
author Junying Xia
Bo Wang
Xinxin Guo
Zhuoxiong Xie
author_facet Junying Xia
Bo Wang
Xinxin Guo
Zhuoxiong Xie
author_sort Junying Xia
collection DOAJ
description Current studies on blasting construction of small clear-distance tunnels have not considered the impact of existing tunnel lining defects when establishing safety controls. This paper offers a series of study results based on the blasting project of a new tunnel adjacent to the existing defect Xinling tunnel to thoroughly examine the dynamic response, safety control standards, and measures of the existing defect tunnel. First, structural models were developed to investigate the influence of the presence or absence of specific defects (like lining cracks and cavities behind the lining) on the dynamic response of the current tunnel lining to identify the most unfavorable defect distribution. Then, establish safety control standards for intact linings and those with the most unfavorable defects. Eventually, two types of control measures, single safe charge and reasonable delay time, were studied based on the established safety control standards. In particular, the most adverse position of cracks was the wall facing the explosion, the rise in depth was more unfavorable for vibration response, and the impact of the longitudinal crack was restricted to the vicinity of the crack. While the vault was the most adverse cavity position, the rise in cavity area was more damaging, and the influence range varied with longitudinal cavity length. Moreover, the impact of cracks was mainly evident in the amplification effect of stress at the crack region. In contrast, cavities had varied degrees of amplification effects on the vibration velocity and stress response and a relatively extensive influence range. Safety control research was conducted, when the tunnel was intact, with a right wall crack, a vault cavity, and both vault cavity and crack for this project, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the safety control standard for vibration velocity was 13, 10, 13, and 8 cm/s, respectively, and the respective single safe charge could be adjusted at 64, 53, 37, and 25 kg. However, the presence of different defects had a relatively negligible effect on the reasonable delay time; 25 ms was recommended for existing tunnel lining with and without the defect.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:58:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afbdeff5c23a417dbde2c94644f2b4cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-9674
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:58:27Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Underground Space
spelling doaj.art-afbdeff5c23a417dbde2c94644f2b4cf2023-12-24T04:46:12ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Underground Space2467-96742024-04-01157689Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defectsJunying Xia0Bo Wang1Xinxin Guo2Zhuoxiong Xie3Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, ChinaKey Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; Corresponding author.College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, ChinaGuangdong Communication Planning & Design Institute Group Co.,Ltd, Guangzhou 510507,ChinaCurrent studies on blasting construction of small clear-distance tunnels have not considered the impact of existing tunnel lining defects when establishing safety controls. This paper offers a series of study results based on the blasting project of a new tunnel adjacent to the existing defect Xinling tunnel to thoroughly examine the dynamic response, safety control standards, and measures of the existing defect tunnel. First, structural models were developed to investigate the influence of the presence or absence of specific defects (like lining cracks and cavities behind the lining) on the dynamic response of the current tunnel lining to identify the most unfavorable defect distribution. Then, establish safety control standards for intact linings and those with the most unfavorable defects. Eventually, two types of control measures, single safe charge and reasonable delay time, were studied based on the established safety control standards. In particular, the most adverse position of cracks was the wall facing the explosion, the rise in depth was more unfavorable for vibration response, and the impact of the longitudinal crack was restricted to the vicinity of the crack. While the vault was the most adverse cavity position, the rise in cavity area was more damaging, and the influence range varied with longitudinal cavity length. Moreover, the impact of cracks was mainly evident in the amplification effect of stress at the crack region. In contrast, cavities had varied degrees of amplification effects on the vibration velocity and stress response and a relatively extensive influence range. Safety control research was conducted, when the tunnel was intact, with a right wall crack, a vault cavity, and both vault cavity and crack for this project, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the safety control standard for vibration velocity was 13, 10, 13, and 8 cm/s, respectively, and the respective single safe charge could be adjusted at 64, 53, 37, and 25 kg. However, the presence of different defects had a relatively negligible effect on the reasonable delay time; 25 ms was recommended for existing tunnel lining with and without the defect.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967423001289Existing tunnelDefectBlasting constructionVibration responseControl standards and measures
spellingShingle Junying Xia
Bo Wang
Xinxin Guo
Zhuoxiong Xie
Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
Underground Space
Existing tunnel
Defect
Blasting construction
Vibration response
Control standards and measures
title Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
title_full Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
title_fullStr Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
title_full_unstemmed Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
title_short Vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
title_sort vibration response and safety control for blasting vibration of the existing tunnel with defects
topic Existing tunnel
Defect
Blasting construction
Vibration response
Control standards and measures
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967423001289
work_keys_str_mv AT junyingxia vibrationresponseandsafetycontrolforblastingvibrationoftheexistingtunnelwithdefects
AT bowang vibrationresponseandsafetycontrolforblastingvibrationoftheexistingtunnelwithdefects
AT xinxinguo vibrationresponseandsafetycontrolforblastingvibrationoftheexistingtunnelwithdefects
AT zhuoxiongxie vibrationresponseandsafetycontrolforblastingvibrationoftheexistingtunnelwithdefects