The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness

Pupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Zavagno, Luca Tommasi, Bruno Laeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-08-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754
_version_ 1819088609233338368
author Daniele Zavagno
Luca Tommasi
Bruno Laeng
author_facet Daniele Zavagno
Luca Tommasi
Bruno Laeng
author_sort Daniele Zavagno
collection DOAJ
description Pupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appeared as a pattern of filled squares that—in a few seconds—gradually changed into gradients until the patterns were identical to the static ones. Gradients could either converge toward the center, resulting in a central region of enhanced, illusory, brightness or darkness, or oriented toward each side of the screen, resulting in the perception of a peripheral ring of illusory brightness or darkness. It was found that pupil responses to these illusions matched both the direction and intensity of perceived changes in light: Glare stimuli resulted in pupil constrictions, and darkness stimuli evoked dilations of the pupils. A second experiment found that gradients of brightness were most effective in constricting the pupils than isoluminant step-luminance, local, variations in luminance. This set of findings suggest that the eye strategically adjusts to reflect in a predictive manner, given that these brightness illusions only suggest a change in luminance when none has occurred, the content within brightness maps of the visual scene.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:54:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afcd9f1fd4564112b312b8268a911d7f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-6695
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:54:45Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series i-Perception
spelling doaj.art-afcd9f1fd4564112b312b8268a911d7f2022-12-21T18:49:00ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952017-08-01810.1177/2041669517717754The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and DarknessDaniele ZavagnoLuca TommasiBruno LaengPupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appeared as a pattern of filled squares that—in a few seconds—gradually changed into gradients until the patterns were identical to the static ones. Gradients could either converge toward the center, resulting in a central region of enhanced, illusory, brightness or darkness, or oriented toward each side of the screen, resulting in the perception of a peripheral ring of illusory brightness or darkness. It was found that pupil responses to these illusions matched both the direction and intensity of perceived changes in light: Glare stimuli resulted in pupil constrictions, and darkness stimuli evoked dilations of the pupils. A second experiment found that gradients of brightness were most effective in constricting the pupils than isoluminant step-luminance, local, variations in luminance. This set of findings suggest that the eye strategically adjusts to reflect in a predictive manner, given that these brightness illusions only suggest a change in luminance when none has occurred, the content within brightness maps of the visual scene.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754
spellingShingle Daniele Zavagno
Luca Tommasi
Bruno Laeng
The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
i-Perception
title The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
title_full The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
title_fullStr The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
title_full_unstemmed The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
title_short The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
title_sort eye pupil s response to static and dynamic illusions of luminosity and darkness
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754
work_keys_str_mv AT danielezavagno theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness
AT lucatommasi theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness
AT brunolaeng theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness
AT danielezavagno eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness
AT lucatommasi eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness
AT brunolaeng eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness