The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness
Pupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appea...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2017-08-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754 |
_version_ | 1819088609233338368 |
---|---|
author | Daniele Zavagno Luca Tommasi Bruno Laeng |
author_facet | Daniele Zavagno Luca Tommasi Bruno Laeng |
author_sort | Daniele Zavagno |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Pupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appeared as a pattern of filled squares that—in a few seconds—gradually changed into gradients until the patterns were identical to the static ones. Gradients could either converge toward the center, resulting in a central region of enhanced, illusory, brightness or darkness, or oriented toward each side of the screen, resulting in the perception of a peripheral ring of illusory brightness or darkness. It was found that pupil responses to these illusions matched both the direction and intensity of perceived changes in light: Glare stimuli resulted in pupil constrictions, and darkness stimuli evoked dilations of the pupils. A second experiment found that gradients of brightness were most effective in constricting the pupils than isoluminant step-luminance, local, variations in luminance. This set of findings suggest that the eye strategically adjusts to reflect in a predictive manner, given that these brightness illusions only suggest a change in luminance when none has occurred, the content within brightness maps of the visual scene. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T21:54:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-afcd9f1fd4564112b312b8268a911d7f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2041-6695 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T21:54:45Z |
publishDate | 2017-08-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | i-Perception |
spelling | doaj.art-afcd9f1fd4564112b312b8268a911d7f2022-12-21T18:49:00ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952017-08-01810.1177/2041669517717754The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and DarknessDaniele ZavagnoLuca TommasiBruno LaengPupil diameters were recorded with an eye-tracker while participants observed cruciform patterns of gray-scale gradients that evoked illusions of enhanced brightness ( glare ) or of enhanced darkness. The illusions were either presented as static images or as dynamic animations which initially appeared as a pattern of filled squares that—in a few seconds—gradually changed into gradients until the patterns were identical to the static ones. Gradients could either converge toward the center, resulting in a central region of enhanced, illusory, brightness or darkness, or oriented toward each side of the screen, resulting in the perception of a peripheral ring of illusory brightness or darkness. It was found that pupil responses to these illusions matched both the direction and intensity of perceived changes in light: Glare stimuli resulted in pupil constrictions, and darkness stimuli evoked dilations of the pupils. A second experiment found that gradients of brightness were most effective in constricting the pupils than isoluminant step-luminance, local, variations in luminance. This set of findings suggest that the eye strategically adjusts to reflect in a predictive manner, given that these brightness illusions only suggest a change in luminance when none has occurred, the content within brightness maps of the visual scene.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754 |
spellingShingle | Daniele Zavagno Luca Tommasi Bruno Laeng The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness i-Perception |
title | The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness |
title_full | The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness |
title_fullStr | The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness |
title_full_unstemmed | The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness |
title_short | The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness |
title_sort | eye pupil s response to static and dynamic illusions of luminosity and darkness |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517717754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielezavagno theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness AT lucatommasi theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness AT brunolaeng theeyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness AT danielezavagno eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness AT lucatommasi eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness AT brunolaeng eyepupilsresponsetostaticanddynamicillusionsofluminosityanddarkness |