Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska

This study aimed to describe the impact of 13 different health information technologies (HITs) on patient safety across pharmacy practice settings from the viewpoint of the working pharmacist. A cross-sectional mixed methods survey of all licensed practicing pharmacists in 2008 in Nebraska (n = 2195...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly A. Galt, Kevin T. Fuji, Ted K. Kaufman, Shweta R. Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/7
_version_ 1798003992841682944
author Kimberly A. Galt
Kevin T. Fuji
Ted K. Kaufman
Shweta R. Shah
author_facet Kimberly A. Galt
Kevin T. Fuji
Ted K. Kaufman
Shweta R. Shah
author_sort Kimberly A. Galt
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to describe the impact of 13 different health information technologies (HITs) on patient safety across pharmacy practice settings from the viewpoint of the working pharmacist. A cross-sectional mixed methods survey of all licensed practicing pharmacists in 2008 in Nebraska (n = 2195) was developed, pilot-tested and IRB approved. One-fourth responded (24.4%). A database of pharmacists’ responses to closed-ended quantitative questions and in vivo qualitative responses to open-ended questions was built. Qualitative data was coded and thematically analyzed, transformed to quantitative data and descriptive and relational statistics performed. One-third were involved in an error of any kind in the six months preceding the survey, and half observed an error or “near miss”. Most errors or near misses were attributed to workload. When asked specifically about the 13 HITs, these participants reported 3252 observations about the types of errors that were associated with each. These were reports about either error types reduced or eliminated by integration of HIT (n = 1908) or occurring in association with a specific technology’s use (n = 1344). Integration of HIT into pharmacy practice also introduced new error types such as excessive alert programming in the pharmacy computer systems clinical information support causing pharmacists to experience alert fatigue and ignore warnings or bar code scanners mismatching NDC codes of products resulting in wrong drug product identification. Continued vigilance is essential to identifying patient safety issues and implementing safety strategies specific to each HIT.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:17:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afdc8b0cec8247359773764bafc7fdca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-4787
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:17:18Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmacy
spelling doaj.art-afdc8b0cec8247359773764bafc7fdca2022-12-22T04:24:16ZengMDPI AGPharmacy2226-47872019-01-0171710.3390/pharmacy7010007pharmacy7010007Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in NebraskaKimberly A. Galt0Kevin T. Fuji1Ted K. Kaufman2Shweta R. Shah3Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USACenter for Health Services Research and Patient Safety, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USACenter for Health Services Research and Patient Safety, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USACenter for Health Services Research and Patient Safety, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USAThis study aimed to describe the impact of 13 different health information technologies (HITs) on patient safety across pharmacy practice settings from the viewpoint of the working pharmacist. A cross-sectional mixed methods survey of all licensed practicing pharmacists in 2008 in Nebraska (n = 2195) was developed, pilot-tested and IRB approved. One-fourth responded (24.4%). A database of pharmacists’ responses to closed-ended quantitative questions and in vivo qualitative responses to open-ended questions was built. Qualitative data was coded and thematically analyzed, transformed to quantitative data and descriptive and relational statistics performed. One-third were involved in an error of any kind in the six months preceding the survey, and half observed an error or “near miss”. Most errors or near misses were attributed to workload. When asked specifically about the 13 HITs, these participants reported 3252 observations about the types of errors that were associated with each. These were reports about either error types reduced or eliminated by integration of HIT (n = 1908) or occurring in association with a specific technology’s use (n = 1344). Integration of HIT into pharmacy practice also introduced new error types such as excessive alert programming in the pharmacy computer systems clinical information support causing pharmacists to experience alert fatigue and ignore warnings or bar code scanners mismatching NDC codes of products resulting in wrong drug product identification. Continued vigilance is essential to identifying patient safety issues and implementing safety strategies specific to each HIT.http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/7pharmacyhealth information technologypatient safetymedication safetyerror reportingpractice culturemixed methods
spellingShingle Kimberly A. Galt
Kevin T. Fuji
Ted K. Kaufman
Shweta R. Shah
Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
Pharmacy
pharmacy
health information technology
patient safety
medication safety
error reporting
practice culture
mixed methods
title Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
title_full Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
title_fullStr Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
title_full_unstemmed Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
title_short Health Information Technology Use and Patient Safety: Study of Pharmacists in Nebraska
title_sort health information technology use and patient safety study of pharmacists in nebraska
topic pharmacy
health information technology
patient safety
medication safety
error reporting
practice culture
mixed methods
url http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/7/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlyagalt healthinformationtechnologyuseandpatientsafetystudyofpharmacistsinnebraska
AT kevintfuji healthinformationtechnologyuseandpatientsafetystudyofpharmacistsinnebraska
AT tedkkaufman healthinformationtechnologyuseandpatientsafetystudyofpharmacistsinnebraska
AT shwetarshah healthinformationtechnologyuseandpatientsafetystudyofpharmacistsinnebraska