Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control

Abstract Background Heat shock is a potential control strategy for Legionella pneumophila in hot water plumbing systems. However, it is not consistently effective, with little understanding of its influence on the broader plumbing microbiome. Here, we employed a lab-scale recirculating hot water plu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pan Ji, William J. Rhoads, Marc A. Edwards, Amy Pruden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-02-01
Series:Microbiome
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-018-0406-7
_version_ 1819212170455416832
author Pan Ji
William J. Rhoads
Marc A. Edwards
Amy Pruden
author_facet Pan Ji
William J. Rhoads
Marc A. Edwards
Amy Pruden
author_sort Pan Ji
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Heat shock is a potential control strategy for Legionella pneumophila in hot water plumbing systems. However, it is not consistently effective, with little understanding of its influence on the broader plumbing microbiome. Here, we employed a lab-scale recirculating hot water plumbing rig to compare the pre- and post-“heat shock” (i.e., 40 → 60 → 40 °C) microbiota at distal taps. In addition, we used a second plumbing rig to represent a well-managed system at 60 °C and conducted a “control” sampling at 60 °C, subsequently reducing the temperature to 40 °C to observe the effects on Legionella and the microbiota under a simulated “thermal disruption” scenario. Results According to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, in the heat shock scenario, there was no significant difference or statistically significant, but small, difference in the microbial community composition at the distal taps pre- versus post-heat shock (both biofilm and water; weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance matrices). While heat shock did lead to decreased total bacteria numbers at distal taps, it did not measurably alter the richness or evenness of the microbiota. Quantitative PCR measurements demonstrated that L. pneumophila relative abundance at distal taps also was not significantly different at 2-month post-heat shock relative to the pre-heat shock condition, while relative abundance of Vermamoeba vermiformis, a known Legionella host, did increase. In the thermal disruption scenario, relative abundance of planktonic L. pneumophila (quantitative PCR data) increased to levels comparable to those observed in the heat shock scenario within 2 months of switching long-term operation at 60 to 40 °C. Overall, water use frequency and water heater temperature set point exhibited a stronger effect than one-time heat shock on the microbial composition and Legionella levels at distal taps. Conclusions While heat shock may be effective for instantaneous Legionella control and reduction in total bacteria numbers, water heater temperature set point and water use frequency are more promising factors for long-term Legionella and microbial community control, illustrating the importance of maintaining consistent elevated temperatures in the system relative to short-term heat shock.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:38:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afea24190e324542afbf8a293360b120
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2049-2618
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:38:43Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Microbiome
spelling doaj.art-afea24190e324542afbf8a293360b1202022-12-21T17:56:44ZengBMCMicrobiome2049-26182018-02-016111410.1186/s40168-018-0406-7Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila controlPan Ji0William J. Rhoads1Marc A. Edwards2Amy Pruden3Via Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia TechVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia TechVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia TechVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia TechAbstract Background Heat shock is a potential control strategy for Legionella pneumophila in hot water plumbing systems. However, it is not consistently effective, with little understanding of its influence on the broader plumbing microbiome. Here, we employed a lab-scale recirculating hot water plumbing rig to compare the pre- and post-“heat shock” (i.e., 40 → 60 → 40 °C) microbiota at distal taps. In addition, we used a second plumbing rig to represent a well-managed system at 60 °C and conducted a “control” sampling at 60 °C, subsequently reducing the temperature to 40 °C to observe the effects on Legionella and the microbiota under a simulated “thermal disruption” scenario. Results According to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, in the heat shock scenario, there was no significant difference or statistically significant, but small, difference in the microbial community composition at the distal taps pre- versus post-heat shock (both biofilm and water; weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance matrices). While heat shock did lead to decreased total bacteria numbers at distal taps, it did not measurably alter the richness or evenness of the microbiota. Quantitative PCR measurements demonstrated that L. pneumophila relative abundance at distal taps also was not significantly different at 2-month post-heat shock relative to the pre-heat shock condition, while relative abundance of Vermamoeba vermiformis, a known Legionella host, did increase. In the thermal disruption scenario, relative abundance of planktonic L. pneumophila (quantitative PCR data) increased to levels comparable to those observed in the heat shock scenario within 2 months of switching long-term operation at 60 to 40 °C. Overall, water use frequency and water heater temperature set point exhibited a stronger effect than one-time heat shock on the microbial composition and Legionella levels at distal taps. Conclusions While heat shock may be effective for instantaneous Legionella control and reduction in total bacteria numbers, water heater temperature set point and water use frequency are more promising factors for long-term Legionella and microbial community control, illustrating the importance of maintaining consistent elevated temperatures in the system relative to short-term heat shock.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-018-0406-7Heat shockHot water plumbingDistal tapsOpportunistic pathogens—biofilm16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
spellingShingle Pan Ji
William J. Rhoads
Marc A. Edwards
Amy Pruden
Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
Microbiome
Heat shock
Hot water plumbing
Distal taps
Opportunistic pathogens—biofilm
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
title Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
title_full Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
title_fullStr Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
title_full_unstemmed Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
title_short Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control
title_sort effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and legionella pneumophila control
topic Heat shock
Hot water plumbing
Distal taps
Opportunistic pathogens—biofilm
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40168-018-0406-7
work_keys_str_mv AT panji effectofheatshockonhotwaterplumbingmicrobiotaandlegionellapneumophilacontrol
AT williamjrhoads effectofheatshockonhotwaterplumbingmicrobiotaandlegionellapneumophilacontrol
AT marcaedwards effectofheatshockonhotwaterplumbingmicrobiotaandlegionellapneumophilacontrol
AT amypruden effectofheatshockonhotwaterplumbingmicrobiotaandlegionellapneumophilacontrol