A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy

Abstract Background To compare the clinical efficacy of two alimentary tract reconstruction methods—“P”-shape jejunal interposition (PJI) and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after total gastrectomy. Method The following search phrases were utilized to search PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Academic Jo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-hang Liu, Rui Meng, Bing Zhu, Qi-qi Zhan, Xin Yang, Guan-yi Ding, Chun-liang Jia, Wei-guo Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03002-z
_version_ 1797836432545415168
author Yu-hang Liu
Rui Meng
Bing Zhu
Qi-qi Zhan
Xin Yang
Guan-yi Ding
Chun-liang Jia
Wei-guo Xu
author_facet Yu-hang Liu
Rui Meng
Bing Zhu
Qi-qi Zhan
Xin Yang
Guan-yi Ding
Chun-liang Jia
Wei-guo Xu
author_sort Yu-hang Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To compare the clinical efficacy of two alimentary tract reconstruction methods—“P”-shape jejunal interposition (PJI) and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after total gastrectomy. Method The following search phrases were utilized to search PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Academic Journals Network Full-text Database (CNKI), and Wanfang Database as of April 2022: “gastrectomy,” “Roux-en-Y,” “interposition,” “total gastrectomy,” and “jejunal interposition.” Meta-analysis of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, and postoperative nutritional status of patients was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 24 studies and 1887 patients were included in the study. Among patients who received a total gastrectomy, the operation time in the PJI group was substantially longer than that in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 19.77, 95% CI: 5.84–33.70, P = 0.005). The incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis in the PJI group was considerably reduced than that in the Roux-en-Y group (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.28–0.56, P < 0.01). The probability of postoperative dumping syndrome in the PJI group was significantly lower than that in the Roux-en-Y group (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17–0.43, P < 0.01), and the postoperative body mass changes were significantly lower in the PJI group than in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.24–5.64, P < 0.01). The PJI group had substantially higher postoperative hemoglobin, albumin, and total protein levels than the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 13.94, 95% CI: 7.77–19.20, P < 0.01; WMD = 3.97, 95% CI: 2.58–5.37, P < 0.01; WMD = 5.31, 95% CI: 3.45–7.16, P < 0.01). The prognostic nutritional index was higher in the PJI group than in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 9.25, 95% CI: 7.37–11.13, P < 0.01). Conclusion PJI is a safe and effective reconstruction method and is superior to Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications and postoperative nutritional recovery in patients after total gastrectomy.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:09:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b010694b230042a9a9569225a2839bc8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:09:21Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-b010694b230042a9a9569225a2839bc82023-04-30T11:18:08ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192023-04-0121111110.1186/s12957-023-03002-zA meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomyYu-hang Liu0Rui Meng1Bing Zhu2Qi-qi Zhan3Xin Yang4Guan-yi Ding5Chun-liang Jia6Wei-guo Xu7North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated HospitalDepartment of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji UniversityTangshan Gongren HospitalNorth China University of Science and Technology Affiliated HospitalNorth China University of Science and Technology Affiliated HospitalTangshan Gongren HospitalTangshan People’s HospitalNorth China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, China & Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China Hospital Medical Sciences, Shenzhen CenterAbstract Background To compare the clinical efficacy of two alimentary tract reconstruction methods—“P”-shape jejunal interposition (PJI) and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after total gastrectomy. Method The following search phrases were utilized to search PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Academic Journals Network Full-text Database (CNKI), and Wanfang Database as of April 2022: “gastrectomy,” “Roux-en-Y,” “interposition,” “total gastrectomy,” and “jejunal interposition.” Meta-analysis of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, and postoperative nutritional status of patients was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 24 studies and 1887 patients were included in the study. Among patients who received a total gastrectomy, the operation time in the PJI group was substantially longer than that in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 19.77, 95% CI: 5.84–33.70, P = 0.005). The incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis in the PJI group was considerably reduced than that in the Roux-en-Y group (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.28–0.56, P < 0.01). The probability of postoperative dumping syndrome in the PJI group was significantly lower than that in the Roux-en-Y group (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17–0.43, P < 0.01), and the postoperative body mass changes were significantly lower in the PJI group than in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.24–5.64, P < 0.01). The PJI group had substantially higher postoperative hemoglobin, albumin, and total protein levels than the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 13.94, 95% CI: 7.77–19.20, P < 0.01; WMD = 3.97, 95% CI: 2.58–5.37, P < 0.01; WMD = 5.31, 95% CI: 3.45–7.16, P < 0.01). The prognostic nutritional index was higher in the PJI group than in the Roux-en-Y group (WMD = 9.25, 95% CI: 7.37–11.13, P < 0.01). Conclusion PJI is a safe and effective reconstruction method and is superior to Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the prevention and treatment of postoperative complications and postoperative nutritional recovery in patients after total gastrectomy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03002-zAlimentary tract reconstructionJejunal interpositionMeta-analysisRoux-en-YTotal gastrectomy
spellingShingle Yu-hang Liu
Rui Meng
Bing Zhu
Qi-qi Zhan
Xin Yang
Guan-yi Ding
Chun-liang Jia
Wei-guo Xu
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Alimentary tract reconstruction
Jejunal interposition
Meta-analysis
Roux-en-Y
Total gastrectomy
title A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
title_full A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
title_short A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
title_sort meta analysis of the efficacy of roux en y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy
topic Alimentary tract reconstruction
Jejunal interposition
Meta-analysis
Roux-en-Y
Total gastrectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03002-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhangliu ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT ruimeng ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT bingzhu ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT qiqizhan ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT xinyang ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT guanyiding ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT chunliangjia ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT weiguoxu ametaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT yuhangliu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT ruimeng metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT bingzhu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT qiqizhan metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT xinyang metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT guanyiding metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT chunliangjia metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy
AT weiguoxu metaanalysisoftheefficacyofrouxenyanastomosisandjejunalinterpositionaftertotalgastrectomy