Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review

Introduction Telemedicine is being used in an increasing number of healthy lifestyle intervention studies in preventive cardiology. However, the optimal telemedicine-based approach for patients with cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to identify w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felix Gass, Martin Halle, Stephan Mueller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-07-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221114186
_version_ 1818196459734958080
author Felix Gass
Martin Halle
Stephan Mueller
author_facet Felix Gass
Martin Halle
Stephan Mueller
author_sort Felix Gass
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Telemedicine is being used in an increasing number of healthy lifestyle intervention studies in preventive cardiology. However, the optimal telemedicine-based approach for patients with cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to identify which design features are associated with the acceptance and efficacy of telemedicine in this specific patient population. Methods The databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched from 5 October 2010 to 5 October 2020. This systematic review only included randomized controlled or quasi-randomized controlled trials with a comparator to a telemedicine-based intervention group and a designated measure of adherence. We adopted a narrative synthesis approach to define telemedical design features, which were clustered into three main categories (social, exercise related and barrier removal) and compared to adherence (graded as good, medium and bad) and primary outcomes (significant improvement, no significant change). Results We screened a total of 865 records, of which 14 were included in this review, containing 13 identified design features. In 8 studies (57.1%), adherence was graded as good (4 studies medium, 2 studies bad). A positive primary outcome occurred in 10 (71.4%) studies. Personal contact showed the most pronounced (while not statistically significant) positive association with adherence and study outcomes. Conclusion Given the remote nature of telemedical lifestyle intervention studies, including recurring personal contact in the intervention seems to be a key factor in ensuring that adherence levels remain comparable to those seen in centre-based interventions.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:34:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b01b443f3fa64a67b00db262607db0f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-2076
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:34:25Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Digital Health
spelling doaj.art-b01b443f3fa64a67b00db262607db0f42022-12-22T00:42:53ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762022-07-01810.1177/20552076221114186Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic reviewFelix Gass0Martin Halle1Stephan Mueller2 DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, GermanyIntroduction Telemedicine is being used in an increasing number of healthy lifestyle intervention studies in preventive cardiology. However, the optimal telemedicine-based approach for patients with cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to identify which design features are associated with the acceptance and efficacy of telemedicine in this specific patient population. Methods The databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched from 5 October 2010 to 5 October 2020. This systematic review only included randomized controlled or quasi-randomized controlled trials with a comparator to a telemedicine-based intervention group and a designated measure of adherence. We adopted a narrative synthesis approach to define telemedical design features, which were clustered into three main categories (social, exercise related and barrier removal) and compared to adherence (graded as good, medium and bad) and primary outcomes (significant improvement, no significant change). Results We screened a total of 865 records, of which 14 were included in this review, containing 13 identified design features. In 8 studies (57.1%), adherence was graded as good (4 studies medium, 2 studies bad). A positive primary outcome occurred in 10 (71.4%) studies. Personal contact showed the most pronounced (while not statistically significant) positive association with adherence and study outcomes. Conclusion Given the remote nature of telemedical lifestyle intervention studies, including recurring personal contact in the intervention seems to be a key factor in ensuring that adherence levels remain comparable to those seen in centre-based interventions.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221114186
spellingShingle Felix Gass
Martin Halle
Stephan Mueller
Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
Digital Health
title Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
title_full Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
title_fullStr Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
title_short Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review
title_sort telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221114186
work_keys_str_mv AT felixgass telemedicineacceptanceandefficacyinthecontextofpreventivecardiologyinterventionsasystematicreview
AT martinhalle telemedicineacceptanceandefficacyinthecontextofpreventivecardiologyinterventionsasystematicreview
AT stephanmueller telemedicineacceptanceandefficacyinthecontextofpreventivecardiologyinterventionsasystematicreview