Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Peter A Simmons, Cindy Carlisle-Wilcox, Joseph G Vehige Ophthalmology Research and Development, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA Background: Dry eye may be caused or exacerbated by deficient lipid secretion. Recently, lipid-containing artificial tears have been developed to alleviate this deficienc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simmons PA, Carlisle-Wilcox C, Vehige JG
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-04-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-novel-lipid-based-eye-drops-with-aqueous-eye-drops-for-d-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
_version_ 1819015925206089728
author Simmons PA
Carlisle-Wilcox C
Vehige JG
author_facet Simmons PA
Carlisle-Wilcox C
Vehige JG
author_sort Simmons PA
collection DOAJ
description Peter A Simmons, Cindy Carlisle-Wilcox, Joseph G Vehige Ophthalmology Research and Development, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA Background: Dry eye may be caused or exacerbated by deficient lipid secretion. Recently, lipid-containing artificial tears have been developed to alleviate this deficiency. Our study compared the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of lipid-containing eye drops with that of aqueous eye drops.Methods: A non-inferiority, randomized, parallel-group, investigator-masked multicenter trial was conducted. Subjects with signs and symptoms of dry eye were randomized to use one of two lipid-containing artificial tears, or one of two aqueous artificial tears. Subjects instilled assigned drops in each eye at least twice daily for 30 days. The primary efficacy analysis tested non-inferiority of a preservative-free lipid tear formulation (LT UD) to a preservative-free aqueous tear formulation (AqT UD) for change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score from baseline at day 30. Secondary measures included OSDI at day 7, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer’s test, acceptability and usage questionnaires, and safety assessments.Results: A total of 315 subjects were randomized and included in the analyses. Subjects reported instilling a median of three doses of study eye drops per day in all groups. At days 7 and 30, all groups showed statistically significant improvements from baseline in OSDI (P<0.001) and TBUT (P≤0.005). LT UD was non-inferior to AqT UD for mean change from baseline in OSDI score at day 30. No consistent or clinically relevant differences for the other efficacy variables were observed. Acceptability was generally similar across the groups and there was a low incidence of adverse events.Conclusion: In this heterogeneous population of dry eye subjects, there were no clinically significant differences in safety, effectiveness, and acceptability between lipid-containing artificial tears and aqueous eye drops. The results suggest that lipid-containing artificial tears can be used to counteract lipid deficiency that is common in dry eye, without compromising overall acceptability. Keywords: artificial tears, emulsion, dry eye, Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time, tear film lipid layer
first_indexed 2024-12-21T02:39:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b020ec35e7644e8cb38a1877172d0bf6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T02:39:28Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-b020ec35e7644e8cb38a1877172d0bf62022-12-21T19:18:42ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832015-04-012015default65766421337Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trialSimmons PACarlisle-Wilcox CVehige JGPeter A Simmons, Cindy Carlisle-Wilcox, Joseph G Vehige Ophthalmology Research and Development, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA Background: Dry eye may be caused or exacerbated by deficient lipid secretion. Recently, lipid-containing artificial tears have been developed to alleviate this deficiency. Our study compared the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of lipid-containing eye drops with that of aqueous eye drops.Methods: A non-inferiority, randomized, parallel-group, investigator-masked multicenter trial was conducted. Subjects with signs and symptoms of dry eye were randomized to use one of two lipid-containing artificial tears, or one of two aqueous artificial tears. Subjects instilled assigned drops in each eye at least twice daily for 30 days. The primary efficacy analysis tested non-inferiority of a preservative-free lipid tear formulation (LT UD) to a preservative-free aqueous tear formulation (AqT UD) for change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score from baseline at day 30. Secondary measures included OSDI at day 7, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer’s test, acceptability and usage questionnaires, and safety assessments.Results: A total of 315 subjects were randomized and included in the analyses. Subjects reported instilling a median of three doses of study eye drops per day in all groups. At days 7 and 30, all groups showed statistically significant improvements from baseline in OSDI (P<0.001) and TBUT (P≤0.005). LT UD was non-inferior to AqT UD for mean change from baseline in OSDI score at day 30. No consistent or clinically relevant differences for the other efficacy variables were observed. Acceptability was generally similar across the groups and there was a low incidence of adverse events.Conclusion: In this heterogeneous population of dry eye subjects, there were no clinically significant differences in safety, effectiveness, and acceptability between lipid-containing artificial tears and aqueous eye drops. The results suggest that lipid-containing artificial tears can be used to counteract lipid deficiency that is common in dry eye, without compromising overall acceptability. Keywords: artificial tears, emulsion, dry eye, Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time, tear film lipid layerhttp://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-novel-lipid-based-eye-drops-with-aqueous-eye-drops-for-d-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
spellingShingle Simmons PA
Carlisle-Wilcox C
Vehige JG
Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Clinical Ophthalmology
title Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of novel lipid-based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of novel lipid based eye drops with aqueous eye drops for dry eye a multicenter randomized controlled trial
url http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-novel-lipid-based-eye-drops-with-aqueous-eye-drops-for-d-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT simmonspa comparisonofnovellipidbasedeyedropswithaqueouseyedropsfordryeyeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carlislewilcoxc comparisonofnovellipidbasedeyedropswithaqueouseyedropsfordryeyeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vehigejg comparisonofnovellipidbasedeyedropswithaqueouseyedropsfordryeyeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial