Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention

Abstract Background Cephalic arch stenoses (CAS) occur in near 70% of elbow arteriovenous fistulas. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains first-line treatment despite documented stent-grafts (SG) efficacy. The study aim is to report long-term outcomes based on initial treatment of CAS....

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Umberto Pisano, Karen Stevenson, Ram Kasthuri, David Kingsmore
Aineistotyyppi: Artikkeli
Kieli:English
Julkaistu: SpringerOpen 2024-01-01
Sarja:CVIR Endovascular
Aiheet:
Linkit:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00424-4
_version_ 1827377079442735104
author Umberto Pisano
Karen Stevenson
Ram Kasthuri
David Kingsmore
author_facet Umberto Pisano
Karen Stevenson
Ram Kasthuri
David Kingsmore
author_sort Umberto Pisano
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cephalic arch stenoses (CAS) occur in near 70% of elbow arteriovenous fistulas. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains first-line treatment despite documented stent-grafts (SG) efficacy. The study aim is to report long-term outcomes based on initial treatment of CAS. Methods Retrospective review of 12-year data in single tertiary centre. Outcomes included technical success, rupture rate, primary patency (PP), dialysis performance; categorical variables assessed via χ2 or Fisher’s; nonparametric tests used for skewed data. Kaplan–Meier analysis used for PP and cumulative patency. Cox proportional hazard regression model to assess explanatory variables in PP. Results One hundred one brachio- and radiocephalic fistulas with CAS were included. SG as first intervention had higher success than PTA (85% vs 61%, p = 0.003). Rupture occurred in 9/85 (10.6%) PTA vs 0% in SG (p = 0.046). In a subgroup with poor urea reduction rate (URR), both PTA and SG improved dialysis performance post-intervention (p = 0.002). SG demonstrated better PP than PTA (79,73,60% patency at 3, 6, 9 months; versus 71,51,47%; p = 0.195) and cumulative patency (73,61,61% at 1, 2, 3 years; versus 60,34,26%; p < 0.001). Of the variables analyzed, technical success of PTA was the only discriminating factor (coeff.-1.01; RR 35%, p = 0.035). Accesses that underwent secondary stenting performed better than primarily stented CAS (p = 0.01). Conclusions SG superiority is confirmed in CAS, particularly when angioplasty is unsuccessful. While PTA has short-lived benefits, it can improve dialysis performance. Other than higher success rate, primary CAS stenting did not have advantages compared to post-PTA stenting in our study. Other factors related to inflow, outflow, conduit characteristics are presumed to be involved in access longevity.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:33:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0281a74574d4169a9acc5f26632d5e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2520-8934
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:33:42Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series CVIR Endovascular
spelling doaj.art-b0281a74574d4169a9acc5f26632d5e02024-01-21T12:36:53ZengSpringerOpenCVIR Endovascular2520-89342024-01-017111010.1186/s42155-023-00424-4Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first interventionUmberto Pisano0Karen Stevenson1Ram Kasthuri2David Kingsmore3Radiology Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRenal Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRadiology Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRenal Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeAbstract Background Cephalic arch stenoses (CAS) occur in near 70% of elbow arteriovenous fistulas. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains first-line treatment despite documented stent-grafts (SG) efficacy. The study aim is to report long-term outcomes based on initial treatment of CAS. Methods Retrospective review of 12-year data in single tertiary centre. Outcomes included technical success, rupture rate, primary patency (PP), dialysis performance; categorical variables assessed via χ2 or Fisher’s; nonparametric tests used for skewed data. Kaplan–Meier analysis used for PP and cumulative patency. Cox proportional hazard regression model to assess explanatory variables in PP. Results One hundred one brachio- and radiocephalic fistulas with CAS were included. SG as first intervention had higher success than PTA (85% vs 61%, p = 0.003). Rupture occurred in 9/85 (10.6%) PTA vs 0% in SG (p = 0.046). In a subgroup with poor urea reduction rate (URR), both PTA and SG improved dialysis performance post-intervention (p = 0.002). SG demonstrated better PP than PTA (79,73,60% patency at 3, 6, 9 months; versus 71,51,47%; p = 0.195) and cumulative patency (73,61,61% at 1, 2, 3 years; versus 60,34,26%; p < 0.001). Of the variables analyzed, technical success of PTA was the only discriminating factor (coeff.-1.01; RR 35%, p = 0.035). Accesses that underwent secondary stenting performed better than primarily stented CAS (p = 0.01). Conclusions SG superiority is confirmed in CAS, particularly when angioplasty is unsuccessful. While PTA has short-lived benefits, it can improve dialysis performance. Other than higher success rate, primary CAS stenting did not have advantages compared to post-PTA stenting in our study. Other factors related to inflow, outflow, conduit characteristics are presumed to be involved in access longevity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00424-4Cephalic archAngioplastyStent graft
spellingShingle Umberto Pisano
Karen Stevenson
Ram Kasthuri
David Kingsmore
Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
CVIR Endovascular
Cephalic arch
Angioplasty
Stent graft
title Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
title_full Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
title_fullStr Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
title_full_unstemmed Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
title_short Cephalic arch stenosis: an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
title_sort cephalic arch stenosis an analysis of outcome by type of first intervention
topic Cephalic arch
Angioplasty
Stent graft
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00424-4
work_keys_str_mv AT umbertopisano cephalicarchstenosisananalysisofoutcomebytypeoffirstintervention
AT karenstevenson cephalicarchstenosisananalysisofoutcomebytypeoffirstintervention
AT ramkasthuri cephalicarchstenosisananalysisofoutcomebytypeoffirstintervention
AT davidkingsmore cephalicarchstenosisananalysisofoutcomebytypeoffirstintervention