Authors’ reply: Calculation of population attributable risk should to be based on robust estimates
We are pleased that the findings of the IPD-Work Consortium continue to generate discussion among occupational health researchers. In his letter to the editor, Ingre used age and sex-adjusted data from the appendix of our paper (1) to calculate population attributable risk (PAR) for job control (2)....
Main Authors: | Mika Kivimäki, Solja T Nyberg, Ichiro Kawachi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3518
|
Similar Items
-
What is needed to make research on the psychosocial work environment and health more meaningful? Reflections and missed opportunities in IPD debates
by: Peter M Smith, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01) -
Recommendations for individual participant data meta-analyses on work stressors and health outcomes: comments on IPD-Work Consortium papers
by: BongKyoo Choi, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01) -
Molecular characterization of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates from a tertiary children’s hospital in eastern China
by: Xu Huang, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Excuse me, but did the IPD-work consortium just “falsify” the job-strain model?
by: Michael Ingre
Published: (2015-09-01) -
IPD3 and IPD3L Function Redundantly in Rhizobial and Mycorrhizal Symbioses
by: Yue Jin, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)