Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.

As social scientists have investigated the political and social factors influencing public opinion in science-related policy debates, there has been growing interest in the implications of this research for public communication and outreach. Given the level of political polarization in the United St...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Nisbet, Ezra M Markowitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3928253?pdf=render
_version_ 1819128929795964928
author Matthew Nisbet
Ezra M Markowitz
author_facet Matthew Nisbet
Ezra M Markowitz
author_sort Matthew Nisbet
collection DOAJ
description As social scientists have investigated the political and social factors influencing public opinion in science-related policy debates, there has been growing interest in the implications of this research for public communication and outreach. Given the level of political polarization in the United States, much of the focus has been on partisan differences in public opinion, the strategies employed by political leaders and advocates that promote those differences, and the counter-strategies for overcoming them. Yet this focus on partisan differences tends to overlook the processes by which core beliefs about science and society impact public opinion and how these schema are often activated by specific frames of reference embedded in media coverage and popular discourse. In this study, analyzing cross-sectional, nationally representative survey data collected between 2002 and 2010, we investigate the relative influence of political partisanship and science-related schema on Americans' support for embryonic stem cell research. In comparison to the influence of partisan identity, our findings suggest that generalized beliefs about science and society were more chronically accessible, less volatile in relation to media attention and focusing events, and an overall stronger influence on public opinion. Classifying respondents into four unique audience groups based on their beliefs about science and society, we additionally find that individuals within each of these groups split relatively evenly by partisanship but differ on other important dimensions. The implications for public engagement and future research on controversies related to biomedical science are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:35:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b02ec40ef4d5421db6d4602d82330f32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:35:38Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b02ec40ef4d5421db6d4602d82330f322022-12-21T18:32:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8847310.1371/journal.pone.0088473Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.Matthew NisbetEzra M MarkowitzAs social scientists have investigated the political and social factors influencing public opinion in science-related policy debates, there has been growing interest in the implications of this research for public communication and outreach. Given the level of political polarization in the United States, much of the focus has been on partisan differences in public opinion, the strategies employed by political leaders and advocates that promote those differences, and the counter-strategies for overcoming them. Yet this focus on partisan differences tends to overlook the processes by which core beliefs about science and society impact public opinion and how these schema are often activated by specific frames of reference embedded in media coverage and popular discourse. In this study, analyzing cross-sectional, nationally representative survey data collected between 2002 and 2010, we investigate the relative influence of political partisanship and science-related schema on Americans' support for embryonic stem cell research. In comparison to the influence of partisan identity, our findings suggest that generalized beliefs about science and society were more chronically accessible, less volatile in relation to media attention and focusing events, and an overall stronger influence on public opinion. Classifying respondents into four unique audience groups based on their beliefs about science and society, we additionally find that individuals within each of these groups split relatively evenly by partisanship but differ on other important dimensions. The implications for public engagement and future research on controversies related to biomedical science are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3928253?pdf=render
spellingShingle Matthew Nisbet
Ezra M Markowitz
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
PLoS ONE
title Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
title_full Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
title_fullStr Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
title_full_unstemmed Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
title_short Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
title_sort understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3928253?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewnisbet understandingpublicopinionindebatesoverbiomedicalresearchlookingbeyondpoliticalpartisanshiptofocusonbeliefsaboutscienceandsociety
AT ezrammarkowitz understandingpublicopinionindebatesoverbiomedicalresearchlookingbeyondpoliticalpartisanshiptofocusonbeliefsaboutscienceandsociety