Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools

Thromboembolism in multiple myeloma (MM) patients remains a common complication that renders the optimization of our thromboprophylaxis practice necessary. This review aims to make clear the need for the development of more accurate risk assessment tools and means of thrombosis prevention. Current c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Despina Fotiou, Maria Gavriatopoulou, Evangelos Terpos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/1/191
_version_ 1797708208601563136
author Despina Fotiou
Maria Gavriatopoulou
Evangelos Terpos
author_facet Despina Fotiou
Maria Gavriatopoulou
Evangelos Terpos
author_sort Despina Fotiou
collection DOAJ
description Thromboembolism in multiple myeloma (MM) patients remains a common complication that renders the optimization of our thromboprophylaxis practice necessary. This review aims to make clear the need for the development of more accurate risk assessment tools and means of thrombosis prevention. Current clinical practice is guided by available guidelines published by the IMWG in 2014, but the extent to which these are implemented is unclear. Recently, several groups developed clinical scores for thrombosis risk in MM in an attempt to improve risk stratification, but these have not been validated or used in clinical practice so far. Research in this field is increasingly focusing on understanding the unique coagulation profile of the MM patient, and data on potential biomarkers that accurately reflect hypercoagulability is emerging. Finally, promising evidence on the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the context of thrombosis prevention in MM patients is increasingly becoming available. The critical appraisal of the above research areas will establish the necessity of combining disease-specific clinical risk factors with coagulation biomarkers to allow more effective risk stratification that will eventually lead to the reduction of this significant complication. Results from ongoing clinical trials on the role of DOACs are much anticipated.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:19:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b03f3ba7021a4955883553de59671374
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:19:01Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-b03f3ba7021a4955883553de596713742023-09-03T02:24:12ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-01-0112119110.3390/cancers12010191cancers12010191Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction ToolsDespina Fotiou0Maria Gavriatopoulou1Evangelos Terpos2Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, GreeceThromboembolism in multiple myeloma (MM) patients remains a common complication that renders the optimization of our thromboprophylaxis practice necessary. This review aims to make clear the need for the development of more accurate risk assessment tools and means of thrombosis prevention. Current clinical practice is guided by available guidelines published by the IMWG in 2014, but the extent to which these are implemented is unclear. Recently, several groups developed clinical scores for thrombosis risk in MM in an attempt to improve risk stratification, but these have not been validated or used in clinical practice so far. Research in this field is increasingly focusing on understanding the unique coagulation profile of the MM patient, and data on potential biomarkers that accurately reflect hypercoagulability is emerging. Finally, promising evidence on the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the context of thrombosis prevention in MM patients is increasingly becoming available. The critical appraisal of the above research areas will establish the necessity of combining disease-specific clinical risk factors with coagulation biomarkers to allow more effective risk stratification that will eventually lead to the reduction of this significant complication. Results from ongoing clinical trials on the role of DOACs are much anticipated.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/1/191multiple myelomavenous thromboembolismrisk assessment modelsthromboprophylaxisdirect oral anticoagulants
spellingShingle Despina Fotiou
Maria Gavriatopoulou
Evangelos Terpos
Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
Cancers
multiple myeloma
venous thromboembolism
risk assessment models
thromboprophylaxis
direct oral anticoagulants
title Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
title_full Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
title_fullStr Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
title_short Multiple Myeloma and Thrombosis: Prophylaxis and Risk Prediction Tools
title_sort multiple myeloma and thrombosis prophylaxis and risk prediction tools
topic multiple myeloma
venous thromboembolism
risk assessment models
thromboprophylaxis
direct oral anticoagulants
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/1/191
work_keys_str_mv AT despinafotiou multiplemyelomaandthrombosisprophylaxisandriskpredictiontools
AT mariagavriatopoulou multiplemyelomaandthrombosisprophylaxisandriskpredictiontools
AT evangelosterpos multiplemyelomaandthrombosisprophylaxisandriskpredictiontools