Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study

Background: Endometrial receptivity is one of the important factors in assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. In the luteal phase of an ART cycle, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone are often placed in low levels. Supporting the luteal phase with progesterone is a usual method. Objective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Eftekhar, Banafsheh Mohammadi, Esmat Mangoli, Maryam Mortazavi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2020-11-01
Series:International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7964
_version_ 1830482942585995264
author Maryam Eftekhar
Banafsheh Mohammadi
Esmat Mangoli
Maryam Mortazavi
author_facet Maryam Eftekhar
Banafsheh Mohammadi
Esmat Mangoli
Maryam Mortazavi
author_sort Maryam Eftekhar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Endometrial receptivity is one of the important factors in assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. In the luteal phase of an ART cycle, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone are often placed in low levels. Supporting the luteal phase with progesterone is a usual method. Objective: To evaluate the effects of E2 supplementation plus progesterone on the luteal phase support in the antagonist protocol who have undergone intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients with antagonist stimulation protocol, who had undergone intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, were divided into two groups based on the use of E2 supplementation. In both groups, 400 mg progesterone suppositories (CyclogestⓇ), twice a day/vaginally, was administered starting from the day of oocyte collection until the fetal heart activity. However, in the E2 group, in addition to progesterone, 4 mg tablet of E2 was received daily. Beta hCG was checked 14 days after the embryo transfer, and the clinical pregnancy rate was the main endpoint. Results: The patients' characteristics were matched, and insignificant differences were observed, except for endometrial thickness. The clinical outcomes showed the rate of pregnancy was higher in the E2 group compared to the control group; nonetheless, statistically, there was no noticeable difference. Conclusion: E2 supplementation had no beneficial effect in the luteal phase support of IVF cycles. Nevertheless, more studies are required to confirm the supportive role of E2 supplementation for embryo implantation and to improve the outcomes in ART cycles.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:43:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b04763865b3b4fff84170b361d349d6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-3772
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:43:51Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
spelling doaj.art-b04763865b3b4fff84170b361d349d6c2022-12-21T18:55:34ZengShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine2476-37722020-11-011896997410.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7964ijrm.v13i11.7964Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional studyMaryam Eftekhar0Banafsheh Mohammadi1Esmat Mangoli2Maryam Mortazavi3 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.Background: Endometrial receptivity is one of the important factors in assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. In the luteal phase of an ART cycle, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone are often placed in low levels. Supporting the luteal phase with progesterone is a usual method. Objective: To evaluate the effects of E2 supplementation plus progesterone on the luteal phase support in the antagonist protocol who have undergone intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients with antagonist stimulation protocol, who had undergone intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, were divided into two groups based on the use of E2 supplementation. In both groups, 400 mg progesterone suppositories (CyclogestⓇ), twice a day/vaginally, was administered starting from the day of oocyte collection until the fetal heart activity. However, in the E2 group, in addition to progesterone, 4 mg tablet of E2 was received daily. Beta hCG was checked 14 days after the embryo transfer, and the clinical pregnancy rate was the main endpoint. Results: The patients' characteristics were matched, and insignificant differences were observed, except for endometrial thickness. The clinical outcomes showed the rate of pregnancy was higher in the E2 group compared to the control group; nonetheless, statistically, there was no noticeable difference. Conclusion: E2 supplementation had no beneficial effect in the luteal phase support of IVF cycles. Nevertheless, more studies are required to confirm the supportive role of E2 supplementation for embryo implantation and to improve the outcomes in ART cycles.https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7964luteal phase, estradiol, progesterone, icsi, pregnancy rate.
spellingShingle Maryam Eftekhar
Banafsheh Mohammadi
Esmat Mangoli
Maryam Mortazavi
Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
luteal phase, estradiol, progesterone, icsi, pregnancy rate.
title Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
title_full Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
title_short Is there any correlation between Estradiol supplementation, as luteal phase support, and clinical pregnancy in ART cycles? A cross-sectional study
title_sort is there any correlation between estradiol supplementation as luteal phase support and clinical pregnancy in art cycles a cross sectional study
topic luteal phase, estradiol, progesterone, icsi, pregnancy rate.
url https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7964
work_keys_str_mv AT maryameftekhar isthereanycorrelationbetweenestradiolsupplementationaslutealphasesupportandclinicalpregnancyinartcyclesacrosssectionalstudy
AT banafshehmohammadi isthereanycorrelationbetweenestradiolsupplementationaslutealphasesupportandclinicalpregnancyinartcyclesacrosssectionalstudy
AT esmatmangoli isthereanycorrelationbetweenestradiolsupplementationaslutealphasesupportandclinicalpregnancyinartcyclesacrosssectionalstudy
AT maryammortazavi isthereanycorrelationbetweenestradiolsupplementationaslutealphasesupportandclinicalpregnancyinartcyclesacrosssectionalstudy