Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma

Abstract Background There are limited data on the travel burden for cancer patients with rare tumor types, such as Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Objective The objective of this study was to understand the travel burden of MCC patients. Methods This study used data from an MCC registry at the Seattle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rahul Jain, Joseph Menzin, Kristina Lachance, Patrick McBee, Hemant Phatak, Paul T. Nghiem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-05-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2085
_version_ 1797236880395206656
author Rahul Jain
Joseph Menzin
Kristina Lachance
Patrick McBee
Hemant Phatak
Paul T. Nghiem
author_facet Rahul Jain
Joseph Menzin
Kristina Lachance
Patrick McBee
Hemant Phatak
Paul T. Nghiem
author_sort Rahul Jain
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There are limited data on the travel burden for cancer patients with rare tumor types, such as Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Objective The objective of this study was to understand the travel burden of MCC patients. Methods This study used data from an MCC registry at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA). All MCC patients enrolled at SCCA with a valid 3‐digit ZIP code were included. Patients were followed up from January 1, 2012 until their last follow‐up, death, or end of data (January 1, 2017). Travel burden was measured by one‐way travel distance to SCCA from each patient's 3‐digit ZIP code. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow‐up visit were evaluated and stratified by one‐way driving distance of ≤300 and >300 miles. Results A total of 391 MCC patients were included (68% men, mean age = 67 years [±SD = ±11 years], 67% residing in the West, and 70% white). At diagnosis, 53% of the patients had Stage III or IV MCC. Mean one‐way distance traveled by patients was 1,137 (median: 813) miles, and 57% of patients traveled >300 miles. Compared to patients who traveled ≤300 miles, those who traveled >300 miles were more likely to be <70 years old (46% vs 65%; P < 0.001), were diagnosed with advanced stage (III or IV) MCC (46% vs 59%; P = 0.01), had shorter follow‐up in the cancer registry (mean: 509 vs 212 days; P < 0.001), and had fewer visits during follow‐up (mean: 5.2 vs 2.5; P < 0.001). Conclusions In this single cancer center study, the majority of MCC patients trav‐eled long distances to receive expert care. Longer travel distances appeared to be associated with younger age, a more advanced stage of cancer at study entry and fewer in‐clinic visits, suggesting that travel burden may impact timely and adequate patient care for this rare cancer.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:10:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0482fd423cc4bd9a7606ce67aa47c20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:10:53Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b0482fd423cc4bd9a7606ce67aa47c202024-03-28T10:30:36ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342019-05-01852580258610.1002/cam4.2085Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinomaRahul Jain0Joseph Menzin1Kristina Lachance2Patrick McBee3Hemant Phatak4Paul T. Nghiem5Boston Health Economics BHE Boston MassachusettsBoston Health Economics BHE Boston MassachusettsDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WashingtonBoston Health Economics BHE Boston MassachusettsEMD Serono, Inc. Rockland MassachusettsDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WashingtonAbstract Background There are limited data on the travel burden for cancer patients with rare tumor types, such as Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Objective The objective of this study was to understand the travel burden of MCC patients. Methods This study used data from an MCC registry at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA). All MCC patients enrolled at SCCA with a valid 3‐digit ZIP code were included. Patients were followed up from January 1, 2012 until their last follow‐up, death, or end of data (January 1, 2017). Travel burden was measured by one‐way travel distance to SCCA from each patient's 3‐digit ZIP code. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow‐up visit were evaluated and stratified by one‐way driving distance of ≤300 and >300 miles. Results A total of 391 MCC patients were included (68% men, mean age = 67 years [±SD = ±11 years], 67% residing in the West, and 70% white). At diagnosis, 53% of the patients had Stage III or IV MCC. Mean one‐way distance traveled by patients was 1,137 (median: 813) miles, and 57% of patients traveled >300 miles. Compared to patients who traveled ≤300 miles, those who traveled >300 miles were more likely to be <70 years old (46% vs 65%; P < 0.001), were diagnosed with advanced stage (III or IV) MCC (46% vs 59%; P = 0.01), had shorter follow‐up in the cancer registry (mean: 509 vs 212 days; P < 0.001), and had fewer visits during follow‐up (mean: 5.2 vs 2.5; P < 0.001). Conclusions In this single cancer center study, the majority of MCC patients trav‐eled long distances to receive expert care. Longer travel distances appeared to be associated with younger age, a more advanced stage of cancer at study entry and fewer in‐clinic visits, suggesting that travel burden may impact timely and adequate patient care for this rare cancer.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2085cancer managementclinical observations
spellingShingle Rahul Jain
Joseph Menzin
Kristina Lachance
Patrick McBee
Hemant Phatak
Paul T. Nghiem
Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
Cancer Medicine
cancer management
clinical observations
title Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
title_full Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
title_short Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma
title_sort travel burden associated with rare cancers the example of merkel cell carcinoma
topic cancer management
clinical observations
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2085
work_keys_str_mv AT rahuljain travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma
AT josephmenzin travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma
AT kristinalachance travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma
AT patrickmcbee travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma
AT hemantphatak travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma
AT paultnghiem travelburdenassociatedwithrarecancerstheexampleofmerkelcellcarcinoma