A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours

Regardless of their gradations, all varieties of asphalts pavement mixtures are smooth and impermeable, which reduces the safety of cars in different weather situations. Comfort and safety on the roads during various weather conditions are directly influenced by surface layer characteristics. Porous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherzad Waisy Khalid, Botan M. Ahmad AL-Hadad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-02-01
Series:Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447923003155
_version_ 1797299705180323840
author Sherzad Waisy Khalid
Botan M. Ahmad AL-Hadad
author_facet Sherzad Waisy Khalid
Botan M. Ahmad AL-Hadad
author_sort Sherzad Waisy Khalid
collection DOAJ
description Regardless of their gradations, all varieties of asphalts pavement mixtures are smooth and impermeable, which reduces the safety of cars in different weather situations. Comfort and safety on the roads during various weather conditions are directly influenced by surface layer characteristics. Porous asphalt has quick surface drainage, eliminates splashing, and improves safety. Additionally, because water drains into the asphalt mixture's pores, the desired level of friction between the tire and the pavement will be guaranteed. This necessitates the production of permeable asphalt pavement mixtures for roads and highways that can handle heavy traffic loads. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the enhancement of stability and mechanical properties in porous mixtures by substituting conventional limestone filler with Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste Plastic (PET) powder. Simultaneously, the study aims to mitigate environmental pollution by utilizing PET materials, which take decades to decompose naturally. The PET used in the study was melted at 260 0C and then powdered using 7000, 18000, and 28000 rpm grinders to obtain filler that passed sieve no. 200. The ASTM D7064-based evaluation of the mixture's optimum asphalt content takes into account essential factors, including drain down, percentage of air voids, and optionally, the results of the Cantabro abrasion test, which was calculated to be 4.75%, decreased to 4.5% when polyethylene terephthalate powder was utilized as filler in place of limestone. The optimum limestone filler percentage was 3.0% based on National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) gradation employed the same procedure in the optimum asphalt content evaluation. However, the results showed that the optimum amount when using PET powder reached 3.5%. The criteria used to investigate the newly proposed asphalt pavement mixture are the Marshall method, Drain down of binder, Cantabro loss test, and permeability of porous mixture. This research reveals that adding PET as an alternative filler to limestone reduces permeability, Drain Down, and Cantabro by 22.64%, 29.27%, and 16.33% respectively while increasing the stability by more than 15.5%. It is still promising that the permeability of the mixture stays within the desirable limit for comfort and safe driving. Filler replacement was tied to performance testing and was demonstrated to raise the deformation strength in the KIM test more than twice from 1.54 MPa to 3.63 MPa by employing a specialized head and Marshall loading machine as an alternative method to the wheel tracking test for evaluating rutting in the mixture. The index of retained stability by aging the samples in water bath at 25 °C from one to four days increased from 8.66 MPa by 33.1% to reach 12.57 MPa where filler replaced, and the indirect tensile strength based on ASTM D4867raised by 29.08% from 0.578 to 0.735 MPa for conditions samples and raised from 0.681 to 0.879 MPa to raise the unconditioned samples by 12.9%. It is also worth noting that the use of PET as a waste material has significant environmental benefits.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:54:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b06954dbc2944ef3ae2a9efa0477cb9f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-4479
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:54:34Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ain Shams Engineering Journal
spelling doaj.art-b06954dbc2944ef3ae2a9efa0477cb9f2024-02-23T04:59:38ZengElsevierAin Shams Engineering Journal2090-44792024-02-01152102426A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behavioursSherzad Waisy Khalid0Botan M. Ahmad AL-Hadad1PhD Student at College of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq; Corresponding author.Erbil Technology College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, IraqRegardless of their gradations, all varieties of asphalts pavement mixtures are smooth and impermeable, which reduces the safety of cars in different weather situations. Comfort and safety on the roads during various weather conditions are directly influenced by surface layer characteristics. Porous asphalt has quick surface drainage, eliminates splashing, and improves safety. Additionally, because water drains into the asphalt mixture's pores, the desired level of friction between the tire and the pavement will be guaranteed. This necessitates the production of permeable asphalt pavement mixtures for roads and highways that can handle heavy traffic loads. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the enhancement of stability and mechanical properties in porous mixtures by substituting conventional limestone filler with Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste Plastic (PET) powder. Simultaneously, the study aims to mitigate environmental pollution by utilizing PET materials, which take decades to decompose naturally. The PET used in the study was melted at 260 0C and then powdered using 7000, 18000, and 28000 rpm grinders to obtain filler that passed sieve no. 200. The ASTM D7064-based evaluation of the mixture's optimum asphalt content takes into account essential factors, including drain down, percentage of air voids, and optionally, the results of the Cantabro abrasion test, which was calculated to be 4.75%, decreased to 4.5% when polyethylene terephthalate powder was utilized as filler in place of limestone. The optimum limestone filler percentage was 3.0% based on National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) gradation employed the same procedure in the optimum asphalt content evaluation. However, the results showed that the optimum amount when using PET powder reached 3.5%. The criteria used to investigate the newly proposed asphalt pavement mixture are the Marshall method, Drain down of binder, Cantabro loss test, and permeability of porous mixture. This research reveals that adding PET as an alternative filler to limestone reduces permeability, Drain Down, and Cantabro by 22.64%, 29.27%, and 16.33% respectively while increasing the stability by more than 15.5%. It is still promising that the permeability of the mixture stays within the desirable limit for comfort and safe driving. Filler replacement was tied to performance testing and was demonstrated to raise the deformation strength in the KIM test more than twice from 1.54 MPa to 3.63 MPa by employing a specialized head and Marshall loading machine as an alternative method to the wheel tracking test for evaluating rutting in the mixture. The index of retained stability by aging the samples in water bath at 25 °C from one to four days increased from 8.66 MPa by 33.1% to reach 12.57 MPa where filler replaced, and the indirect tensile strength based on ASTM D4867raised by 29.08% from 0.578 to 0.735 MPa for conditions samples and raised from 0.681 to 0.879 MPa to raise the unconditioned samples by 12.9%. It is also worth noting that the use of PET as a waste material has significant environmental benefits.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447923003155Porous asphaltPolyethylene terephthalatePETWaste materialsSustainable environment
spellingShingle Sherzad Waisy Khalid
Botan M. Ahmad AL-Hadad
A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Porous asphalt
Polyethylene terephthalate
PET
Waste materials
Sustainable environment
title A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
title_full A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
title_fullStr A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
title_full_unstemmed A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
title_short A comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
title_sort comparison study of using polyethylene terephthalate and limestone fillers on porous asphalt mixture behaviours
topic Porous asphalt
Polyethylene terephthalate
PET
Waste materials
Sustainable environment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447923003155
work_keys_str_mv AT sherzadwaisykhalid acomparisonstudyofusingpolyethyleneterephthalateandlimestonefillersonporousasphaltmixturebehaviours
AT botanmahmadalhadad acomparisonstudyofusingpolyethyleneterephthalateandlimestonefillersonporousasphaltmixturebehaviours
AT sherzadwaisykhalid comparisonstudyofusingpolyethyleneterephthalateandlimestonefillersonporousasphaltmixturebehaviours
AT botanmahmadalhadad comparisonstudyofusingpolyethyleneterephthalateandlimestonefillersonporousasphaltmixturebehaviours