Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids

We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Max Walton-Raaby, Tyler Floen, Guillermo García-Díez, Nelaine Mora-Diez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Antioxidants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/7/1420
_version_ 1797590533652086784
author Max Walton-Raaby
Tyler Floen
Guillermo García-Díez
Nelaine Mora-Diez
author_facet Max Walton-Raaby
Tyler Floen
Guillermo García-Díez
Nelaine Mora-Diez
author_sort Max Walton-Raaby
collection DOAJ
description We aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK<sub>a</sub> values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>B</mi><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>H</mi><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, and the experimental aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK<sub>a</sub> values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK<sub>a</sub> units and R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK<sub>a</sub> units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK<sub>a</sub> predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:21:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b07295c1119f40e982b47b3b34d877e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3921
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:21:51Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Antioxidants
spelling doaj.art-b07295c1119f40e982b47b3b34d877e62023-11-18T18:05:42ZengMDPI AGAntioxidants2076-39212023-07-01127142010.3390/antiox12071420Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and CannabinoidsMax Walton-Raaby0Tyler Floen1Guillermo García-Díez2Nelaine Mora-Diez3Department of Chemistry, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, CanadaWe aim to develop a theoretical methodology for the accurate aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> prediction of structurally complex phenolic antioxidants and cannabinoids. In this study, five functionals (M06-2X, B3LYP, BHandHLYP, PBE0, and TPSS) and two solvent models (SMD and PCM) were combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set to predict pK<sub>a</sub> values for twenty structurally simple phenols. None of the direct calculations produced good results. However, the correlations between the calculated Gibbs energy difference of each acid and its conjugate base, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>B</mi><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mfenced separators="|"><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mrow><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">G</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mi>q</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>H</mi><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, and the experimental aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> values had superior predictive accuracy, which was also tested relative to an independent set of ten molecules of which six were structurally complex phenols. New correlations were built with twenty-seven phenols (including the phenols with experimental pK<sub>a</sub> values from the test set), which were used to make predictions. The best correlation equations used the PCM method and produced mean absolute errors of 0.26–0.27 pK<sub>a</sub> units and R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.957–0.960. The average range of predictions for the potential antioxidants (cannabinoids) was 0.15 (0.25) pK<sub>a</sub> units, which indicates good agreement between our methodologies. The new correlation equations could be used to make pK<sub>a</sub> predictions for other phenols in water and potentially in other solvents where they might be more soluble.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/7/1420acid dissociation constantpK<sub>a</sub>phenolspredictionsantioxidantscannabinoids
spellingShingle Max Walton-Raaby
Tyler Floen
Guillermo García-Díez
Nelaine Mora-Diez
Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
Antioxidants
acid dissociation constant
pK<sub>a</sub>
phenols
predictions
antioxidants
cannabinoids
title Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_full Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_fullStr Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_full_unstemmed Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_short Calculating the Aqueous pK<sub>a</sub> of Phenols: Predictions for Antioxidants and Cannabinoids
title_sort calculating the aqueous pk sub a sub of phenols predictions for antioxidants and cannabinoids
topic acid dissociation constant
pK<sub>a</sub>
phenols
predictions
antioxidants
cannabinoids
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/7/1420
work_keys_str_mv AT maxwaltonraaby calculatingtheaqueouspksubasubofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT tylerfloen calculatingtheaqueouspksubasubofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT guillermogarciadiez calculatingtheaqueouspksubasubofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids
AT nelainemoradiez calculatingtheaqueouspksubasubofphenolspredictionsforantioxidantsandcannabinoids