Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization
The computer audits that are carried out in organizations with or without profit, public or private, must use an adequate methodology and according to their objectives to solve the different problems that arise. For this reason, in this work comparisons are made between the methodologies for Risk A...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Revista Colombiana de Computación |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/4393 |
| _version_ | 1797384899852763136 |
|---|---|
| author | Patricia Rosalia Jimbo Santana Karen Cabrera Pantoja Mónica Jimbo Santana |
| author_facet | Patricia Rosalia Jimbo Santana Karen Cabrera Pantoja Mónica Jimbo Santana |
| author_sort | Patricia Rosalia Jimbo Santana |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The computer audits that are carried out in organizations with or without profit, public or private, must use an adequate methodology and according to their objectives to solve the different problems that arise. For this reason, in this work comparisons are made between the methodologies for Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks - Standards and International Standardization Norms, with the purpose of obtaining results and specific cases that allow the selection of an appropriate methodology against the problem to be solved in the organizations, or against what the organization wants to obtain as a result. All that, through the help of techniques or quantitative and qualitative comparison methods, established in the second part of the investigation; this will depend on which methodology can stand out against another. In the comparative tables, general and specific characteristics were analyzed, finding in the first part, the affinity that the methodologies have compared to their general phases and, when analyzing the specific characteristics, information was obtained that allowed each methodology to be distinguished and, in this way, find the distinctive results for each methodology.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:46:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b07b25efdfe440f089abad4e783a4498 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1657-2831 2539-2115 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:46:16Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Colombiana de Computación |
| spelling | doaj.art-b07b25efdfe440f089abad4e783a44982023-12-20T09:13:54ZengUniversidad Autónoma de BucaramangaRevista Colombiana de Computación1657-28312539-21152023-06-0124110.29375/25392115.4393Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for StandardizationPatricia Rosalia Jimbo Santana0Karen Cabrera Pantoja1Mónica Jimbo Santana2Universidad Central del EcuadorUniversidad Central del EcuadorUniversidad Central del Ecuador The computer audits that are carried out in organizations with or without profit, public or private, must use an adequate methodology and according to their objectives to solve the different problems that arise. For this reason, in this work comparisons are made between the methodologies for Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks - Standards and International Standardization Norms, with the purpose of obtaining results and specific cases that allow the selection of an appropriate methodology against the problem to be solved in the organizations, or against what the organization wants to obtain as a result. All that, through the help of techniques or quantitative and qualitative comparison methods, established in the second part of the investigation; this will depend on which methodology can stand out against another. In the comparative tables, general and specific characteristics were analyzed, finding in the first part, the affinity that the methodologies have compared to their general phases and, when analyzing the specific characteristics, information was obtained that allowed each methodology to be distinguished and, in this way, find the distinctive results for each methodology. https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/4393Computer Auditing, Computer Auditing Methodology, Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frames, ISO standards |
| spellingShingle | Patricia Rosalia Jimbo Santana Karen Cabrera Pantoja Mónica Jimbo Santana Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization Revista Colombiana de Computación Computer Auditing, Computer Auditing Methodology, Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frames, ISO standards |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for the development of Computer Audits considering: Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frameworks and Standards and International Standards for Standardization |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of methodologies for the development of computer audits considering risk analysis data mining reference frameworks and standards and international standards for standardization |
| topic | Computer Auditing, Computer Auditing Methodology, Risk Analysis, Data Mining, Reference Frames, ISO standards |
| url | https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/4393 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patriciarosaliajimbosantana comparativeanalysisofmethodologiesforthedevelopmentofcomputerauditsconsideringriskanalysisdataminingreferenceframeworksandstandardsandinternationalstandardsforstandardization AT karencabrerapantoja comparativeanalysisofmethodologiesforthedevelopmentofcomputerauditsconsideringriskanalysisdataminingreferenceframeworksandstandardsandinternationalstandardsforstandardization AT monicajimbosantana comparativeanalysisofmethodologiesforthedevelopmentofcomputerauditsconsideringriskanalysisdataminingreferenceframeworksandstandardsandinternationalstandardsforstandardization |