Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.

INTRODUCTION: Modelling, supported by the USAID Health Policy Initiative and UNAIDS, performed in 2011, indicated that Uganda would need to perform 4.2 million medical male circumcisions (MMCs) to reach 80% prevalence. Since 2010 Uganda has completed 380,000 circumcisions, and has set a national tar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Duffy, Moses Galukande, Nick Wooding, Monica Dea, Alex Coutinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3661578?pdf=render
_version_ 1818290820753653760
author Kevin Duffy
Moses Galukande
Nick Wooding
Monica Dea
Alex Coutinho
author_facet Kevin Duffy
Moses Galukande
Nick Wooding
Monica Dea
Alex Coutinho
author_sort Kevin Duffy
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: Modelling, supported by the USAID Health Policy Initiative and UNAIDS, performed in 2011, indicated that Uganda would need to perform 4.2 million medical male circumcisions (MMCs) to reach 80% prevalence. Since 2010 Uganda has completed 380,000 circumcisions, and has set a national target of 1 million for 2013. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative reach and cost-effectiveness of PrePex compared to the current surgical SMC method and to determine the effect that this might have in helping to achieve the Uganda national SMC targets. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive cost-analysis study conducted at International Hospital Kampala over ten weeks from August to October 2012. Data collected during the performance of 625 circumcisions using PrePex was compared to data previously collected from 10,000 circumcisions using a surgical circumcision method at the same site. Ethical approval was obtained. RESULTS: The moderate adverse events (AE) ratio when using the PrePex device was 2% and no severe adverse events were encountered, which is comparable to the surgical method, thus the AE rate has no effect on the reach or cost-effectiveness of PrePex. The unit cost to perform one circumcision using PrePex is $30.55, 35% ($7.90) higher than the current surgical method, but the PrePex method improves operator efficiency by 60%, meaning that a team can perform 24 completed circumcisions compared to 15 by the surgical method. The cost-effectiveness of PrePex, comparing the cost of performing circumcisions to the future cost savings of potentially averted HIV infections, is just 2% less than the current surgical method, at a device cost price of $20. CONCLUSION: PrePex is a viable SMC tool for scale-up with unrivalled potential for superior reach, however national targets can only be met with effective demand creation and availability of trained human resource.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T02:34:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b080b7d65f12472c898cfbd1ab657d58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T02:34:15Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b080b7d65f12472c898cfbd1ab657d582022-12-22T00:02:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0185e6313410.1371/journal.pone.0063134Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.Kevin DuffyMoses GalukandeNick WoodingMonica DeaAlex CoutinhoINTRODUCTION: Modelling, supported by the USAID Health Policy Initiative and UNAIDS, performed in 2011, indicated that Uganda would need to perform 4.2 million medical male circumcisions (MMCs) to reach 80% prevalence. Since 2010 Uganda has completed 380,000 circumcisions, and has set a national target of 1 million for 2013. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative reach and cost-effectiveness of PrePex compared to the current surgical SMC method and to determine the effect that this might have in helping to achieve the Uganda national SMC targets. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive cost-analysis study conducted at International Hospital Kampala over ten weeks from August to October 2012. Data collected during the performance of 625 circumcisions using PrePex was compared to data previously collected from 10,000 circumcisions using a surgical circumcision method at the same site. Ethical approval was obtained. RESULTS: The moderate adverse events (AE) ratio when using the PrePex device was 2% and no severe adverse events were encountered, which is comparable to the surgical method, thus the AE rate has no effect on the reach or cost-effectiveness of PrePex. The unit cost to perform one circumcision using PrePex is $30.55, 35% ($7.90) higher than the current surgical method, but the PrePex method improves operator efficiency by 60%, meaning that a team can perform 24 completed circumcisions compared to 15 by the surgical method. The cost-effectiveness of PrePex, comparing the cost of performing circumcisions to the future cost savings of potentially averted HIV infections, is just 2% less than the current surgical method, at a device cost price of $20. CONCLUSION: PrePex is a viable SMC tool for scale-up with unrivalled potential for superior reach, however national targets can only be met with effective demand creation and availability of trained human resource.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3661578?pdf=render
spellingShingle Kevin Duffy
Moses Galukande
Nick Wooding
Monica Dea
Alex Coutinho
Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
PLoS ONE
title Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
title_full Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
title_fullStr Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
title_full_unstemmed Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
title_short Reach and cost-effectiveness of the PrePex device for safe male circumcision in Uganda.
title_sort reach and cost effectiveness of the prepex device for safe male circumcision in uganda
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3661578?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinduffy reachandcosteffectivenessoftheprepexdeviceforsafemalecircumcisioninuganda
AT mosesgalukande reachandcosteffectivenessoftheprepexdeviceforsafemalecircumcisioninuganda
AT nickwooding reachandcosteffectivenessoftheprepexdeviceforsafemalecircumcisioninuganda
AT monicadea reachandcosteffectivenessoftheprepexdeviceforsafemalecircumcisioninuganda
AT alexcoutinho reachandcosteffectivenessoftheprepexdeviceforsafemalecircumcisioninuganda