Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

Background: Glenoid wear secondary to primary osteoarthritis or rotator cuff arthropathy is an obstacle commonly encountered by surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with numerous techniques devised to address this finding. The most recent of such techniques is the introduction of augme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramesh B. Ghanta, MD, Ellen L. Tsay, MD, Brian Feeley, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Series:JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912200092X
_version_ 1811173302996041728
author Ramesh B. Ghanta, MD
Ellen L. Tsay, MD
Brian Feeley, MD
author_facet Ramesh B. Ghanta, MD
Ellen L. Tsay, MD
Brian Feeley, MD
author_sort Ramesh B. Ghanta, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Glenoid wear secondary to primary osteoarthritis or rotator cuff arthropathy is an obstacle commonly encountered by surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with numerous techniques devised to address this finding. The most recent of such techniques is the introduction of augmented glenoid baseplates to fill these glenoid defects. The objectives of this systematic review are to analyze clinical outcomes of augmented baseplates in patients with glenoid wear, including pain, range of motion, patient-reported functional scores, radiographic outcome measures, complication rates, and revision rates. Methods: Three online databases (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed) were searched for studies publishing clinical and functional outcomes of augmented baseplates in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Findings were aggregated and frequency-weighted means of these variables were calculated when applicable. Results: Seven studies comprising 810 patients were included in this review. The mean patient age was 72.1 ± 8.1 years with an average follow-up time of 41.4 months. Frequency-weighted means of improvement in forward elevation, abduction, and active external rotation were 53°, 47°, and 19°, respectively. Patients experienced American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score improvements of 45.9, 5.9, and 33.7, respectively. Pooled complicated rate was 6.4%, with 10 cases of baseplate loosening and 3 cases of instability. Five (0.6%) patients required reoperation. Subdividing among augment type (posterior, superior, posterosuperior), there were no apparent differences in outcomes or complication rates between directional augments. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that augmented baseplates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty provide positive outcomes both clinically and functionally at early follow-up. Complications are within an acceptable range for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a low rate of revision. Augmented baseplates should serve as a viable option for surgeons seeking to address glenoid wear during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:44:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b080e3161f404aca8a506c497fea90a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6391
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:44:35Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
spelling doaj.art-b080e3161f404aca8a506c497fea90a02023-02-03T05:01:22ZengElsevierJSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques2666-63912023-02-01313743Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complicationsRamesh B. Ghanta, MD0Ellen L. Tsay, MD1Brian Feeley, MD2Corresponding author: Ramesh Ghanta, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USABackground: Glenoid wear secondary to primary osteoarthritis or rotator cuff arthropathy is an obstacle commonly encountered by surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with numerous techniques devised to address this finding. The most recent of such techniques is the introduction of augmented glenoid baseplates to fill these glenoid defects. The objectives of this systematic review are to analyze clinical outcomes of augmented baseplates in patients with glenoid wear, including pain, range of motion, patient-reported functional scores, radiographic outcome measures, complication rates, and revision rates. Methods: Three online databases (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed) were searched for studies publishing clinical and functional outcomes of augmented baseplates in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Findings were aggregated and frequency-weighted means of these variables were calculated when applicable. Results: Seven studies comprising 810 patients were included in this review. The mean patient age was 72.1 ± 8.1 years with an average follow-up time of 41.4 months. Frequency-weighted means of improvement in forward elevation, abduction, and active external rotation were 53°, 47°, and 19°, respectively. Patients experienced American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score improvements of 45.9, 5.9, and 33.7, respectively. Pooled complicated rate was 6.4%, with 10 cases of baseplate loosening and 3 cases of instability. Five (0.6%) patients required reoperation. Subdividing among augment type (posterior, superior, posterosuperior), there were no apparent differences in outcomes or complication rates between directional augments. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that augmented baseplates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty provide positive outcomes both clinically and functionally at early follow-up. Complications are within an acceptable range for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a low rate of revision. Augmented baseplates should serve as a viable option for surgeons seeking to address glenoid wear during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912200092XAugmented baseplatesrTSAShoulder arthroplastyGlenoid wearRSAPosterior augments
spellingShingle Ramesh B. Ghanta, MD
Ellen L. Tsay, MD
Brian Feeley, MD
Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
Augmented baseplates
rTSA
Shoulder arthroplasty
Glenoid wear
RSA
Posterior augments
title Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
title_full Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
title_fullStr Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
title_full_unstemmed Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
title_short Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
title_sort augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review of outcomes and complications
topic Augmented baseplates
rTSA
Shoulder arthroplasty
Glenoid wear
RSA
Posterior augments
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912200092X
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshbghantamd augmentedbaseplatesinreverseshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewofoutcomesandcomplications
AT ellenltsaymd augmentedbaseplatesinreverseshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewofoutcomesandcomplications
AT brianfeeleymd augmentedbaseplatesinreverseshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreviewofoutcomesandcomplications