Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Amendments of the 1945 Constitution after reformation era brings the consequences of the necessity to adjust legislation under the constitution, either by elaborating new legislation or change the existing ones as well as through the elaboration of the rights to constitutional review against th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/111 |
| _version_ | 1797900786018025472 |
|---|---|
| author | Ja'far Baehaqi |
| author_facet | Ja'far Baehaqi |
| author_sort | Ja'far Baehaqi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The Amendments of the 1945 Constitution after reformation era brings the consequences of the necessity to adjust legislation under the constitution, either by elaborating new legislation or change the existing ones as well as through the elaboration of the rights to constitutional review against that legislation. On the other hand, the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution introduced the Constitutional Court as a court for constitutional matters of which one of the jurisdictions is to review laws against the 1945 Constitution. Since the beginning, as stated in Law No.24 of 2003 on Constitutional Court, the right to constitutional review has been given half-heartedly. To that fact, the Constitutional Court Law contains: restrictions of laws that may be tested, filing requirements, categorization of the verdict, and the composition of the constitutional judges. In the perspective of progressive law, the Constitutional Court’s ignorance of that restrictions considered as contrary to the constitution itself. However, in certain cases, especially related to the filing requirement for constitutionality review, The Constitutional Court is still locked by the restrictions given by Constitutional Court Law, even it is institutionalized through jurisprudence.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:51:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b081a82b4f1f4ca296288bcfaaaa9327 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:51:34Z |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj.art-b081a82b4f1f4ca296288bcfaaaa93272023-02-22T04:12:43ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572016-05-0110310.31078/jk1033111Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah KonstitusiJa'far Baehaqi0Mahasiswa Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Imam Bardjo, SH No. 1 Semarang 50241 The Amendments of the 1945 Constitution after reformation era brings the consequences of the necessity to adjust legislation under the constitution, either by elaborating new legislation or change the existing ones as well as through the elaboration of the rights to constitutional review against that legislation. On the other hand, the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution introduced the Constitutional Court as a court for constitutional matters of which one of the jurisdictions is to review laws against the 1945 Constitution. Since the beginning, as stated in Law No.24 of 2003 on Constitutional Court, the right to constitutional review has been given half-heartedly. To that fact, the Constitutional Court Law contains: restrictions of laws that may be tested, filing requirements, categorization of the verdict, and the composition of the constitutional judges. In the perspective of progressive law, the Constitutional Court’s ignorance of that restrictions considered as contrary to the constitution itself. However, in certain cases, especially related to the filing requirement for constitutionality review, The Constitutional Court is still locked by the restrictions given by Constitutional Court Law, even it is institutionalized through jurisprudence. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/111judicial reviewconstitutional rightsconstitutional impairment |
| spellingShingle | Ja'far Baehaqi Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi judicial review constitutional rights constitutional impairment |
| title | Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_full | Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_fullStr | Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_full_unstemmed | Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_short | Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_sort | perspektif penegakan hukum progresif dalam judicial review di mahkamah konstitusi |
| topic | judicial review constitutional rights constitutional impairment |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/111 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jafarbaehaqi perspektifpenegakanhukumprogresifdalamjudicialreviewdimahkamahkonstitusi |