The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center

Purpose: Among all the scoring systems to predict limb salvage versus amputation after a complex trauma, MESS scoring system is considered to have good sensitivity and specificity. MESS scoring system is most widely used scoring system for the last more than 25 years. However when we applied MESS sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aryala Shalini, Devender Singh, Sunil Dachipalli, Sashikanth Maddu, Lavanya Ram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Shalini
_version_ 1818937390253735936
author Aryala Shalini
Devender Singh
Sunil Dachipalli
Sashikanth Maddu
Lavanya Ram
author_facet Aryala Shalini
Devender Singh
Sunil Dachipalli
Sashikanth Maddu
Lavanya Ram
author_sort Aryala Shalini
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Among all the scoring systems to predict limb salvage versus amputation after a complex trauma, MESS scoring system is considered to have good sensitivity and specificity. MESS scoring system is most widely used scoring system for the last more than 25 years. However when we applied MESS scoring system in our set of patients, it would not correlate with the need of amputation (for MESS score more than 7) and resulting in significant number of limb salvage. Methods: This a prospective study of 60 patients over a period of two years from June 2017-June 2019. All the patients of lower limb vascular trauma were examined and operated by the same team involving vascular surgeon, orthopedic surgeon and plastic surgeon. MESS scoring system was applied for all the patients. Patients with life threatening injuries were excluded in this study. Results: Between June 2017-2019, 60 patients were entered into the study. The majority were male with mean age of 30 years (Range 11-65years). Road traffic accidents with open injuries were the commonest mechanism of injuries (60%) and popliteal artery was involved in majority of injuries. Out of 35 patients of MESS score more than 7, in 28 patients leg was salvaged with the help of vascular,orthopedics and plastic reconstructions and remaining 7 patients underwent secondary amputation. The hospital stay and the finances involved in the treatment was high in patients with MESS score more than 7, where revascularisation was performed. However in the end psychological assessment of these patients and their family members was very encouraging. Conclusions: With the availability of a dedicated trauma team (which include vascular, orthopedic, plastic surgeons & anaesthetist) and improvement in the diagnostic and treatment modalities, the rate of limb salvage has increased significantly, hence reducing the prediction of MESS scoring system for an amputation. We conclude from our study that majority of lower limbs were salvaged in spite of MESS score being more than 7. We suggest with a word of caution for an amputation directly with a MESS score of more than 7 in all patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:51:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b086c7530c394bc792fd41ed112c1056
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-0820
2394-0999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:51:12Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
spelling doaj.art-b086c7530c394bc792fd41ed112c10562022-12-21T19:51:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery0972-08202394-09992020-01-017214114410.4103/ijves.ijves_63_19The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care centerAryala ShaliniDevender SinghSunil DachipalliSashikanth MadduLavanya RamPurpose: Among all the scoring systems to predict limb salvage versus amputation after a complex trauma, MESS scoring system is considered to have good sensitivity and specificity. MESS scoring system is most widely used scoring system for the last more than 25 years. However when we applied MESS scoring system in our set of patients, it would not correlate with the need of amputation (for MESS score more than 7) and resulting in significant number of limb salvage. Methods: This a prospective study of 60 patients over a period of two years from June 2017-June 2019. All the patients of lower limb vascular trauma were examined and operated by the same team involving vascular surgeon, orthopedic surgeon and plastic surgeon. MESS scoring system was applied for all the patients. Patients with life threatening injuries were excluded in this study. Results: Between June 2017-2019, 60 patients were entered into the study. The majority were male with mean age of 30 years (Range 11-65years). Road traffic accidents with open injuries were the commonest mechanism of injuries (60%) and popliteal artery was involved in majority of injuries. Out of 35 patients of MESS score more than 7, in 28 patients leg was salvaged with the help of vascular,orthopedics and plastic reconstructions and remaining 7 patients underwent secondary amputation. The hospital stay and the finances involved in the treatment was high in patients with MESS score more than 7, where revascularisation was performed. However in the end psychological assessment of these patients and their family members was very encouraging. Conclusions: With the availability of a dedicated trauma team (which include vascular, orthopedic, plastic surgeons & anaesthetist) and improvement in the diagnostic and treatment modalities, the rate of limb salvage has increased significantly, hence reducing the prediction of MESS scoring system for an amputation. We conclude from our study that majority of lower limbs were salvaged in spite of MESS score being more than 7. We suggest with a word of caution for an amputation directly with a MESS score of more than 7 in all patients.http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Shaliniamputationmangled lower limbvascular injuryvascular repair
spellingShingle Aryala Shalini
Devender Singh
Sunil Dachipalli
Sashikanth Maddu
Lavanya Ram
The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
amputation
mangled lower limb
vascular injury
vascular repair
title The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
title_full The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
title_fullStr The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
title_short The validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
title_sort validity of the mangled extremity severity score scoring system for lower limb vascular trauma in a tertiary care center
topic amputation
mangled lower limb
vascular injury
vascular repair
url http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=2;spage=141;epage=144;aulast=Shalini
work_keys_str_mv AT aryalashalini thevalidityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT devendersingh thevalidityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT sunildachipalli thevalidityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT sashikanthmaddu thevalidityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT lavanyaram thevalidityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT aryalashalini validityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT devendersingh validityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT sunildachipalli validityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT sashikanthmaddu validityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter
AT lavanyaram validityofthemangledextremityseverityscorescoringsystemforlowerlimbvasculartraumainatertiarycarecenter