| Summary: | Socio-cultural research might address anthropocentric reasons for honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) conservation. In some regions, particular honeybee subspecies are considered to be native; <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> (“dark bee”) in the north-east and <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> in the Island Beskids in Poland. Additionally, <i>A. mellifera caucasia</i> (often incorrectly called <i>A. mellifera caucasica</i>) and Buckfast are reported across Poland. In order to verify the actual choice of beekeepers, a survey on honeybee subspecies kept in apiaries was conducted annually from 1980 to 2018. This is a way to verify if conservation management towards the dark bee influenced its maintenance at a sufficient level for their restoration. The analysis revealed that Polish beekeepers know what is “buzzing” in their hives, and the awareness of which subspecies/types of honeybee they maintain has grown through the years. Initially, they kept up to four different subspecies per apiary, but now most have only one (maximum of two). Currently, Polish apiaries approach a homogeneous share with the exclusive presence of <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> subspecies. The popularity of indigenous <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> has declined over time and is low now. It seems that new solutions should be considered to increase the effectiveness of dark European bee conservation management efforts.
|
|---|