The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980

Socio-cultural research might address anthropocentric reasons for honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) conservation. In some regions, particular honeybee subspecies are considered to be native; <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> (“dark bee”) in the north-east and <i>A. mellifera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Małgorzata Bieńkowska, Aleksandra Splitt, Paweł Węgrzynowicz, Robert Maciorowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/652
_version_ 1797527816018853888
author Małgorzata Bieńkowska
Aleksandra Splitt
Paweł Węgrzynowicz
Robert Maciorowski
author_facet Małgorzata Bieńkowska
Aleksandra Splitt
Paweł Węgrzynowicz
Robert Maciorowski
author_sort Małgorzata Bieńkowska
collection DOAJ
description Socio-cultural research might address anthropocentric reasons for honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) conservation. In some regions, particular honeybee subspecies are considered to be native; <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> (“dark bee”) in the north-east and <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> in the Island Beskids in Poland. Additionally, <i>A. mellifera caucasia</i> (often incorrectly called <i>A. mellifera caucasica</i>) and Buckfast are reported across Poland. In order to verify the actual choice of beekeepers, a survey on honeybee subspecies kept in apiaries was conducted annually from 1980 to 2018. This is a way to verify if conservation management towards the dark bee influenced its maintenance at a sufficient level for their restoration. The analysis revealed that Polish beekeepers know what is “buzzing” in their hives, and the awareness of which subspecies/types of honeybee they maintain has grown through the years. Initially, they kept up to four different subspecies per apiary, but now most have only one (maximum of two). Currently, Polish apiaries approach a homogeneous share with the exclusive presence of <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> subspecies. The popularity of indigenous <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> has declined over time and is low now. It seems that new solutions should be considered to increase the effectiveness of dark European bee conservation management efforts.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:49:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0937f7c40944262b64b604c3b6a5a9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:49:08Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-b0937f7c40944262b64b604c3b6a5a9e2023-11-22T02:57:04ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-07-0111765210.3390/agriculture11070652The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980Małgorzata Bieńkowska0Aleksandra Splitt1Paweł Węgrzynowicz2Robert Maciorowski3The National Institute of Horticultural Research, ul. Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, PolandThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, ul. Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, PolandThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, ul. Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, PolandThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, ul. Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, PolandSocio-cultural research might address anthropocentric reasons for honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) conservation. In some regions, particular honeybee subspecies are considered to be native; <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> (“dark bee”) in the north-east and <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> in the Island Beskids in Poland. Additionally, <i>A. mellifera caucasia</i> (often incorrectly called <i>A. mellifera caucasica</i>) and Buckfast are reported across Poland. In order to verify the actual choice of beekeepers, a survey on honeybee subspecies kept in apiaries was conducted annually from 1980 to 2018. This is a way to verify if conservation management towards the dark bee influenced its maintenance at a sufficient level for their restoration. The analysis revealed that Polish beekeepers know what is “buzzing” in their hives, and the awareness of which subspecies/types of honeybee they maintain has grown through the years. Initially, they kept up to four different subspecies per apiary, but now most have only one (maximum of two). Currently, Polish apiaries approach a homogeneous share with the exclusive presence of <i>A. mellifera carnica</i> subspecies. The popularity of indigenous <i>A. mellifera mellifera</i> has declined over time and is low now. It seems that new solutions should be considered to increase the effectiveness of dark European bee conservation management efforts.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/652apicultureapiary managementbee tradecitizen sciencedark beepollinator decline
spellingShingle Małgorzata Bieńkowska
Aleksandra Splitt
Paweł Węgrzynowicz
Robert Maciorowski
The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
Agriculture
apiculture
apiary management
bee trade
citizen science
dark bee
pollinator decline
title The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
title_full The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
title_fullStr The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
title_full_unstemmed The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
title_short The Buzz Changes within Time: Native <i>Apis mellifera mellifera</i> Honeybee Subspecies Less and Less Popular among Polish Beekeepers Since 1980
title_sort buzz changes within time native i apis mellifera mellifera i honeybee subspecies less and less popular among polish beekeepers since 1980
topic apiculture
apiary management
bee trade
citizen science
dark bee
pollinator decline
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/7/652
work_keys_str_mv AT małgorzatabienkowska thebuzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT aleksandrasplitt thebuzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT pawełwegrzynowicz thebuzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT robertmaciorowski thebuzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT małgorzatabienkowska buzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT aleksandrasplitt buzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT pawełwegrzynowicz buzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980
AT robertmaciorowski buzzchangeswithintimenativeiapismelliferamelliferaihoneybeesubspecieslessandlesspopularamongpolishbeekeeperssince1980