The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdf |
_version_ | 1827839570344935424 |
---|---|
author | You Hong Song Hyun Jung Chang Yong Beom Shin Young Sook Park Yun Hee Park Eun Sol Cho |
author_facet | You Hong Song Hyun Jung Chang Yong Beom Shin Young Sook Park Yun Hee Park Eun Sol Cho |
author_sort | You Hong Song |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined.ResultsThe TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA.ConclusionOur findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:22:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b093c556b2624be58e77485d99eabf5e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2234-0645 2234-0653 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:22:32Z |
publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-b093c556b2624be58e77485d99eabf5e2023-09-02T22:21:40ZengKorean Academy of Rehabilitation MedicineAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine2234-06452234-06532018-04-0142229630410.5535/arm.2018.42.2.296955The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm InfantsYou Hong Song0Hyun Jung Chang1Yong Beom Shin2Young Sook Park3Yun Hee Park4Eun Sol Cho5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined.ResultsThe TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA.ConclusionOur findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention.http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdfPreterm infantNeuromotor assessmentPredictionMotor skills |
spellingShingle | You Hong Song Hyun Jung Chang Yong Beom Shin Young Sook Park Yun Hee Park Eun Sol Cho The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine Preterm infant Neuromotor assessment Prediction Motor skills |
title | The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants |
title_full | The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants |
title_fullStr | The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants |
title_full_unstemmed | The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants |
title_short | The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants |
title_sort | validity of two neuromotor assessments for predicting motor performance at 12 months in preterm infants |
topic | Preterm infant Neuromotor assessment Prediction Motor skills |
url | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youhongsong thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT hyunjungchang thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT yongbeomshin thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT youngsookpark thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT yunheepark thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT eunsolcho thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT youhongsong validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT hyunjungchang validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT yongbeomshin validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT youngsookpark validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT yunheepark validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants AT eunsolcho validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants |