The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants

ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: You Hong Song, Hyun Jung Chang, Yong Beom Shin, Young Sook Park, Yun Hee Park, Eun Sol Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2018-04-01
Series:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdf
_version_ 1827839570344935424
author You Hong Song
Hyun Jung Chang
Yong Beom Shin
Young Sook Park
Yun Hee Park
Eun Sol Cho
author_facet You Hong Song
Hyun Jung Chang
Yong Beom Shin
Young Sook Park
Yun Hee Park
Eun Sol Cho
author_sort You Hong Song
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined.ResultsThe TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA.ConclusionOur findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b093c556b2624be58e77485d99eabf5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-0645
2234-0653
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:32Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format Article
series Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b093c556b2624be58e77485d99eabf5e2023-09-02T22:21:40ZengKorean Academy of Rehabilitation MedicineAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine2234-06452234-06532018-04-0142229630410.5535/arm.2018.42.2.296955The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm InfantsYou Hong Song0Hyun Jung Chang1Yong Beom Shin2Young Sook Park3Yun Hee Park4Eun Sol Cho5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, .KoreaObjectiveTo evaluate the validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and general movements (GMs) assessment for predicting Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) score at 12 months in preterm infants.MethodsA total of 44 preterm infants who underwent the GMs and TIMP at 1 month and 3 months of corrected age (CA) and whose motor performance was evaluated using AIMS at 12 months CA were included. GMs were judged as abnormal on basis of poor repertoire or cramped-synchronized movements at 1 month CA and abnormal or absent fidgety movement at 3 months CA. TIMP and AIMS scores were categorized as normal (average and low average and >5th percentile, respectively) or abnormal (below average and far below average or <5th percentile, respectively). Correlations between GMs and TIMP scores at 1 month and 3 months CA and the AIMS classification at 12 months CA were examined.ResultsThe TIMP score at 3 months CA and GMs at 1 month and 3 months CA were significantly correlated with the motor performance at 12 months CA. However, the TIMP score at 1 month CA did not correlate with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA. For infants with normal GMs at 3 months CA, the TIMP score at 3 months CA correlated significantly with the AIMS classification at 12 months CA.ConclusionOur findings suggest that neuromotor assessment using GMs and TIMP could be useful to identify preterm infants who are likely to benefit from intervention.http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdfPreterm infantNeuromotor assessmentPredictionMotor skills
spellingShingle You Hong Song
Hyun Jung Chang
Yong Beom Shin
Young Sook Park
Yun Hee Park
Eun Sol Cho
The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Preterm infant
Neuromotor assessment
Prediction
Motor skills
title The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
title_full The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
title_fullStr The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
title_full_unstemmed The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
title_short The Validity of Two Neuromotor Assessments for Predicting Motor Performance at 12 Months in Preterm Infants
title_sort validity of two neuromotor assessments for predicting motor performance at 12 months in preterm infants
topic Preterm infant
Neuromotor assessment
Prediction
Motor skills
url http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-42-296.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT youhongsong thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT hyunjungchang thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT yongbeomshin thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT youngsookpark thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT yunheepark thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT eunsolcho thevalidityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT youhongsong validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT hyunjungchang validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT yongbeomshin validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT youngsookpark validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT yunheepark validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants
AT eunsolcho validityoftwoneuromotorassessmentsforpredictingmotorperformanceat12monthsinpreterminfants