The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation opera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fikret Ucar, Servet Cetinkaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2021-02-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=en
_version_ 1798014359582015488
author Fikret Ucar
Servet Cetinkaya
author_facet Fikret Ucar
Servet Cetinkaya
author_sort Fikret Ucar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation operation between February 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.78 ± 7.49 (41-71) years. Out of 285 patients 137 were male (48.07%) and 148 were female (51.93%). TheIOLsusedare: RayOne Trifocal (Rayner, Worthing, UK), Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), PanOptix (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), LentisMplus (Oculentis, Berlin, Germany), TecnisSymfony (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and Acriva Trinova (VSY Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey). Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, sex, axial length, the mean preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and the mean postoperative SE (subjective measurement) (P> .05). The postoperative refractions measured with autorefractometer were more myopic than subjective refractions in all patients except the patients who had PanOptix IOL. In postoperative twelfth month, the mean UCVA arrived 0.00 logMAR in 405 eyes (78.48%) , however, the mean autorefractometric measurement was -1.28 ± 1.02 (0.00_-2.75) D. Conclusion: The autorefractometer measurements of all patients who had premium IOLs except PanOptix IOL were not coherent with their visual acuities postoperatively. The ophthalmologists and/or optometrists should be careful while examining these types of patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:16:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b09e2e65f8ce460b84d2460d159bc8b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-8551
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:16:11Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
spelling doaj.art-b09e2e65f8ce460b84d2460d159bc8b82022-12-22T04:16:28ZengSociedade Brasileira de OftalmologiaRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia1982-85512021-02-0179638639010.5935/0034-7280.20200084The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lensesFikret Ucarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-7311Servet Cetinkayahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-5356Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation operation between February 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.78 ± 7.49 (41-71) years. Out of 285 patients 137 were male (48.07%) and 148 were female (51.93%). TheIOLsusedare: RayOne Trifocal (Rayner, Worthing, UK), Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), PanOptix (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), LentisMplus (Oculentis, Berlin, Germany), TecnisSymfony (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and Acriva Trinova (VSY Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey). Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, sex, axial length, the mean preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and the mean postoperative SE (subjective measurement) (P> .05). The postoperative refractions measured with autorefractometer were more myopic than subjective refractions in all patients except the patients who had PanOptix IOL. In postoperative twelfth month, the mean UCVA arrived 0.00 logMAR in 405 eyes (78.48%) , however, the mean autorefractometric measurement was -1.28 ± 1.02 (0.00_-2.75) D. Conclusion: The autorefractometer measurements of all patients who had premium IOLs except PanOptix IOL were not coherent with their visual acuities postoperatively. The ophthalmologists and/or optometrists should be careful while examining these types of patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=enLenses, intraocularObjective refractionSubjective refractionVisual acuity
spellingShingle Fikret Ucar
Servet Cetinkaya
The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Lenses, intraocular
Objective refraction
Subjective refraction
Visual acuity
title The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
title_full The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
title_fullStr The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
title_short The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
title_sort evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
topic Lenses, intraocular
Objective refraction
Subjective refraction
Visual acuity
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT fikretucar theevaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses
AT servetcetinkaya theevaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses
AT fikretucar evaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses
AT servetcetinkaya evaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses