The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses
Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation opera...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1798014359582015488 |
---|---|
author | Fikret Ucar Servet Cetinkaya |
author_facet | Fikret Ucar Servet Cetinkaya |
author_sort | Fikret Ucar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation operation between February 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.78 ± 7.49 (41-71) years. Out of 285 patients 137 were male (48.07%) and 148 were female (51.93%). TheIOLsusedare: RayOne Trifocal (Rayner, Worthing, UK), Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), PanOptix (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), LentisMplus (Oculentis, Berlin, Germany), TecnisSymfony (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and Acriva Trinova (VSY Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey). Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, sex, axial length, the mean preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and the mean postoperative SE (subjective measurement) (P> .05). The postoperative refractions measured with autorefractometer were more myopic than subjective refractions in all patients except the patients who had PanOptix IOL. In postoperative twelfth month, the mean UCVA arrived 0.00 logMAR in 405 eyes (78.48%) , however, the mean autorefractometric measurement was -1.28 ± 1.02 (0.00_-2.75) D. Conclusion: The autorefractometer measurements of all patients who had premium IOLs except PanOptix IOL were not coherent with their visual acuities postoperatively. The ophthalmologists and/or optometrists should be careful while examining these types of patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:16:11Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b09e2e65f8ce460b84d2460d159bc8b8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-8551 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:16:11Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia |
spelling | doaj.art-b09e2e65f8ce460b84d2460d159bc8b82022-12-22T04:16:28ZengSociedade Brasileira de OftalmologiaRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia1982-85512021-02-0179638639010.5935/0034-7280.20200084The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lensesFikret Ucarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-7311Servet Cetinkayahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-5356Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation operation between February 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.78 ± 7.49 (41-71) years. Out of 285 patients 137 were male (48.07%) and 148 were female (51.93%). TheIOLsusedare: RayOne Trifocal (Rayner, Worthing, UK), Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), PanOptix (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), LentisMplus (Oculentis, Berlin, Germany), TecnisSymfony (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and Acriva Trinova (VSY Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey). Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, sex, axial length, the mean preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and the mean postoperative SE (subjective measurement) (P> .05). The postoperative refractions measured with autorefractometer were more myopic than subjective refractions in all patients except the patients who had PanOptix IOL. In postoperative twelfth month, the mean UCVA arrived 0.00 logMAR in 405 eyes (78.48%) , however, the mean autorefractometric measurement was -1.28 ± 1.02 (0.00_-2.75) D. Conclusion: The autorefractometer measurements of all patients who had premium IOLs except PanOptix IOL were not coherent with their visual acuities postoperatively. The ophthalmologists and/or optometrists should be careful while examining these types of patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=enLenses, intraocularObjective refractionSubjective refractionVisual acuity |
spellingShingle | Fikret Ucar Servet Cetinkaya The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia Lenses, intraocular Objective refraction Subjective refraction Visual acuity |
title | The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
title_full | The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
title_short | The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
title_sort | evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses |
topic | Lenses, intraocular Objective refraction Subjective refraction Visual acuity |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802020000600386&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fikretucar theevaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses AT servetcetinkaya theevaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses AT fikretucar evaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses AT servetcetinkaya evaluationofpostoperativeobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionforpremiumintraocularlenses |