Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST ver1.1) has been widely adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy in solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC), in clinical trials and clinical practice. RECIST is based mainly on computed tomography (CT) images, and the role of fluorode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirotaka Suto, Yumiko Inui, Atsuo Okamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1158797/full
_version_ 1797843733026177024
author Hirotaka Suto
Hirotaka Suto
Yumiko Inui
Atsuo Okamura
author_facet Hirotaka Suto
Hirotaka Suto
Yumiko Inui
Atsuo Okamura
author_sort Hirotaka Suto
collection DOAJ
description Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST ver1.1) has been widely adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy in solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC), in clinical trials and clinical practice. RECIST is based mainly on computed tomography (CT) images, and the role of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is limited. However, because the rate of tumor shrinkage on CT does not necessarily reflect the potential remaining tumor cells, there may be a discrepancy between the treatment response and prognosis in some cases. Here we report a case of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC where FDG-PET was preferable to CT for evaluation of the treatment response. A 40-year-old woman became aware of a lump in her right breast in September 201X. She was pregnant and underwent further examinations, including a biopsy, in November. The diagnosis was HER2-positive BC (cT2N2bM1, stage IV). Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus docetaxel (TPD) therapy was initiated in December 201X. CT performed in February 201X+1 showed cystic changes in the metastatic lesions in the liver, and the treatment response was stable disease (SD) according to RECIST. However, FDG-PET in March 201X+1 did not detect abnormal uptake of FDG in the hepatic lesions. The disease remained stable thereafter. Thus, tumor shrinkage may not be apparent in situations where the response to treatment results in rapid changes in blood flow within the tumor, which is associated with cystic changes. When patients with hypervascular liver metastases receive treatment with highly effective regimens, the target lesion may show cystic changes rather than shrinkage, as observed in the present case. Therefore, FDG-PET is sometimes superior to CT in judging a tumor response.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:11:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0a1d46395bc432fb8587fb2f548a815
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:11:49Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-b0a1d46395bc432fb8587fb2f548a8152023-04-20T05:58:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-04-011310.3389/fonc.2023.11587971158797Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature reviewHirotaka Suto0Hirotaka Suto1Yumiko Inui2Atsuo Okamura3Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Hyogo, JapanDepartment of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Hyogo, JapanDepartment of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Hyogo, JapanResponse evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST ver1.1) has been widely adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy in solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC), in clinical trials and clinical practice. RECIST is based mainly on computed tomography (CT) images, and the role of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is limited. However, because the rate of tumor shrinkage on CT does not necessarily reflect the potential remaining tumor cells, there may be a discrepancy between the treatment response and prognosis in some cases. Here we report a case of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC where FDG-PET was preferable to CT for evaluation of the treatment response. A 40-year-old woman became aware of a lump in her right breast in September 201X. She was pregnant and underwent further examinations, including a biopsy, in November. The diagnosis was HER2-positive BC (cT2N2bM1, stage IV). Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus docetaxel (TPD) therapy was initiated in December 201X. CT performed in February 201X+1 showed cystic changes in the metastatic lesions in the liver, and the treatment response was stable disease (SD) according to RECIST. However, FDG-PET in March 201X+1 did not detect abnormal uptake of FDG in the hepatic lesions. The disease remained stable thereafter. Thus, tumor shrinkage may not be apparent in situations where the response to treatment results in rapid changes in blood flow within the tumor, which is associated with cystic changes. When patients with hypervascular liver metastases receive treatment with highly effective regimens, the target lesion may show cystic changes rather than shrinkage, as observed in the present case. Therefore, FDG-PET is sometimes superior to CT in judging a tumor response.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1158797/fullbreast cancerHER2liver metastasisCTFDG-PETRECIST
spellingShingle Hirotaka Suto
Hirotaka Suto
Yumiko Inui
Atsuo Okamura
Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
Frontiers in Oncology
breast cancer
HER2
liver metastasis
CT
FDG-PET
RECIST
title Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
title_full Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
title_fullStr Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
title_short Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review
title_sort is ct or fdg pet more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic her2 positive breast cancer a case report and literature review
topic breast cancer
HER2
liver metastasis
CT
FDG-PET
RECIST
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1158797/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hirotakasuto isctorfdgpetmoreusefulforevaluationofthetreatmentresponseinmetastaticher2positivebreastcanceracasereportandliteraturereview
AT hirotakasuto isctorfdgpetmoreusefulforevaluationofthetreatmentresponseinmetastaticher2positivebreastcanceracasereportandliteraturereview
AT yumikoinui isctorfdgpetmoreusefulforevaluationofthetreatmentresponseinmetastaticher2positivebreastcanceracasereportandliteraturereview
AT atsuookamura isctorfdgpetmoreusefulforevaluationofthetreatmentresponseinmetastaticher2positivebreastcanceracasereportandliteraturereview