Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators.
Individuals high in socioeconomic status (SES) are often viewed as valuable members of society. However, the appeal of high-SES people exists in tension with our aversion to inequity. Little experimental work has directly examined how people rectify inequitable distributions between two individuals...
Main Authors: | Bradley D Mattan, Denise M Barth, Alexandra Thompson, Oriel FeldmanHall, Jasmin Cloutier, Jennifer T Kubota |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232369 |
Similar Items
-
Punishment of Third party Duressor in crimes punishable by Hadd
by: Hamid Reza Kalantari, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
IPS: Incentive and Punishment Scheme for Omitting Selfishness in the Internet of Vehicles (Iov)
by: Ghani-Ur Rehman, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment
by: Rob M. A. Nelissen, et al.
Published: (2009-12-01) -
The Effect of Social Category on Third Party Punishment
by: Debra Lieberman, et al.
Published: (2007-04-01) -
The motivational basis of third-party punishment in children.
by: Mathias Twardawski, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)