ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY
This article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go- This article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go gol’s play The Letigation read aloud by the author in house of Aksakov on his first return to Russia from abroad (1839–18...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2017-06-01
|
| Series: | Studia Litterarum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studlit.ru/images/2017-2-2/Paderina.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819177278046732288 |
|---|---|
| author | Ekaterina G. Paderina |
| author_facet | Ekaterina G. Paderina |
| author_sort | Ekaterina G. Paderina |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go- This article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go gol’s play The Letigation read aloud by the author in house of Aksakov on his first return to Russia from abroad (1839–1840). Gogol’s reading is famous for a peculiar hoax: the author did not declare his intention to read the piece, so the listeners took hiccups of his fictional character for his own. Many remembered the incident but the notes of the memorialists on the date of the incident diverge. S.T. Aksakov mentions March 8, 1840 and I.I. Panaev — Summer of 1839. As the episode has not been hitherto dated, Gogol commentators put forward various conjectures about who of the memorialists made a mistake. Besides using all available biographical, epistolary, and memoir data for the analysis of this discrepancy, the author of the paper turns to the results of the textolog ical research of Litigation and typological comparison of Aksakov’s and Panaev’s mem oirs. Both had different goals and generic intentions and thereby we observe a different balance between facts and fiction in the memoirs of each. Aksakov made chronological records of his communication with Gogol that were too premature to publish. Panaev wrote for the upcoming issues of the journal Contemporary and was concerned with entertaining his audience. Analysis of the entire complex of existing data allows date Gogol’s hoax and, consequently, the final edition of the play by March 1840. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:24:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b0d15a01e3494df08ee6bbe0407c9f21 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2500-4247 2541-8564 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:24:07Z |
| publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
| publisher | A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Litterarum |
| spelling | doaj.art-b0d15a01e3494df08ee6bbe0407c9f212022-12-21T18:12:07ZengA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642017-06-012229031510.22455/2500-4247-2017-2-2-290-315ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHYEkaterina G. Paderina0A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesThis article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go- This article focuses on the problems around the exact dating of the final edition of Go gol’s play The Letigation read aloud by the author in house of Aksakov on his first return to Russia from abroad (1839–1840). Gogol’s reading is famous for a peculiar hoax: the author did not declare his intention to read the piece, so the listeners took hiccups of his fictional character for his own. Many remembered the incident but the notes of the memorialists on the date of the incident diverge. S.T. Aksakov mentions March 8, 1840 and I.I. Panaev — Summer of 1839. As the episode has not been hitherto dated, Gogol commentators put forward various conjectures about who of the memorialists made a mistake. Besides using all available biographical, epistolary, and memoir data for the analysis of this discrepancy, the author of the paper turns to the results of the textolog ical research of Litigation and typological comparison of Aksakov’s and Panaev’s mem oirs. Both had different goals and generic intentions and thereby we observe a different balance between facts and fiction in the memoirs of each. Aksakov made chronological records of his communication with Gogol that were too premature to publish. Panaev wrote for the upcoming issues of the journal Contemporary and was concerned with entertaining his audience. Analysis of the entire complex of existing data allows date Gogol’s hoax and, consequently, the final edition of the play by March 1840.http://studlit.ru/images/2017-2-2/Paderina.pdfGogolAksakovPanaevcommentarymemoir genrepolite literaturedating |
| spellingShingle | Ekaterina G. Paderina ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY Studia Litterarum Gogol Aksakov Panaev commentary memoir genre polite literature dating |
| title | ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY |
| title_full | ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY |
| title_fullStr | ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY |
| title_full_unstemmed | ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY |
| title_short | ON LITIGATION CONCERNING “LITIGATION”: THE PROBLEMS OF DATING ONE EPISODE OF GOGOL’S BIOGRAPHY |
| title_sort | on litigation concerning litigation the problems of dating one episode of gogol s biography |
| topic | Gogol Aksakov Panaev commentary memoir genre polite literature dating |
| url | http://studlit.ru/images/2017-2-2/Paderina.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ekaterinagpaderina onlitigationconcerninglitigationtheproblemsofdatingoneepisodeofgogolsbiography |