A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas

The aim of this paper is to provide a review of the concept of historical memory, how it arose and developed historically since World War II, as well as to highlight the shift caused by the concept of memory in the field of historiography and in the political arena. It also seeks to understand why t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Corporación Universitaria Remington 2020-12-01
Series:RHS Revista Humanismo y Sociedad
Subjects:
Online Access:http://fer.uniremington.edu.co/ojs/index.php/RHS/article/view/414
_version_ 1828288366845624320
author Fray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre
author_facet Fray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre
author_sort Fray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this paper is to provide a review of the concept of historical memory, how it arose and developed historically since World War II, as well as to highlight the shift caused by the concept of memory in the field of historiography and in the political arena. It also seeks to understand why the reconstruction of historical memory processes and political-ideological and epistemological dilemmas posed by them are relevant today, as well as their relationship with the issue of truth (both legal and historical), long understood using the subject-object schema. The research uses a hermeneutic-analytic approach to the analysis of bibliographic sources. From these sources, the study examines the issue of truth in historical memory, as well as the differences between legal truth and historical truth that converge in historical memory projects. Historical memory is important in contemporary societies, which see in memory building processes, linked to violations of human rights and human dignity, a potential for reconciliation, pacification and restitution for victims, through the protection of the right to truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:04:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0efa34b0ce6427ca68926c03ab48ab7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2339-4196
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:04:28Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Corporación Universitaria Remington
record_format Article
series RHS Revista Humanismo y Sociedad
spelling doaj.art-b0efa34b0ce6427ca68926c03ab48ab72022-12-22T02:51:10ZengCorporación Universitaria RemingtonRHS Revista Humanismo y Sociedad2339-41962020-12-018211513110.22209/rhs.v8n2a08A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmasFray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-0987Universidad de Antioquia, ColombiaThe aim of this paper is to provide a review of the concept of historical memory, how it arose and developed historically since World War II, as well as to highlight the shift caused by the concept of memory in the field of historiography and in the political arena. It also seeks to understand why the reconstruction of historical memory processes and political-ideological and epistemological dilemmas posed by them are relevant today, as well as their relationship with the issue of truth (both legal and historical), long understood using the subject-object schema. The research uses a hermeneutic-analytic approach to the analysis of bibliographic sources. From these sources, the study examines the issue of truth in historical memory, as well as the differences between legal truth and historical truth that converge in historical memory projects. Historical memory is important in contemporary societies, which see in memory building processes, linked to violations of human rights and human dignity, a potential for reconciliation, pacification and restitution for victims, through the protection of the right to truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition.http://fer.uniremington.edu.co/ojs/index.php/RHS/article/view/414epistemologyjusticenon-repetitionreparationvictimssocial history
spellingShingle Fray Esteban Atehortúa-Aguirre
A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
RHS Revista Humanismo y Sociedad
epistemology
justice
non-repetition
reparation
victims
social history
title A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
title_full A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
title_fullStr A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
title_short A review of the notion of historical memory: memory-history dichotomy, differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
title_sort review of the notion of historical memory memory history dichotomy differences between legal and historical truth and associated dilemmas
topic epistemology
justice
non-repetition
reparation
victims
social history
url http://fer.uniremington.edu.co/ojs/index.php/RHS/article/view/414
work_keys_str_mv AT frayestebanatehortuaaguirre areviewofthenotionofhistoricalmemorymemoryhistorydichotomydifferencesbetweenlegalandhistoricaltruthandassociateddilemmas
AT frayestebanatehortuaaguirre reviewofthenotionofhistoricalmemorymemoryhistorydichotomydifferencesbetweenlegalandhistoricaltruthandassociateddilemmas