CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION

This study proposes a post factum analysis (or rather a final conclusion) of the solution ruled in Case C-648 Hidroelectrica, a case that came before the Court of Justice of the European Union1 , as a preliminary question referred to by the Bucharest Tribunal , as a national court2 . The case was of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2021-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F3_public_law%252FCKS_2021_PUBLIC_LAW_023.pdf
_version_ 1826954213229330432
author Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
author_facet Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
author_sort Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
collection DOAJ
description This study proposes a post factum analysis (or rather a final conclusion) of the solution ruled in Case C-648 Hidroelectrica, a case that came before the Court of Justice of the European Union1 , as a preliminary question referred to by the Bucharest Tribunal , as a national court2 . The case was of real interest in the context in which the preliminary question concerned the interpretation given by a national authority to a rule of domestic law, and not to a rule of European law. Unfortunately, the solution ruled by the CJEU, predictable as of the time of establishing the oral phase in the case, was no surprise, representing a faithful copy of Hidroelectrica's request and adhered to without any reservation by the European Commission. This study shall be a critical analysis (perhaps too critical in certain places) of the reasoning of the CJEU judgment versus the point of view expressed by the European Commission and the conclusions of the Advocate General of the Court, true defenders of the operator in this case. Last but not least, an important part shall be devoted to the previous practice of the CJEU in terms of the inadmissibility of the preliminary questions and a sudden change thereof, which leaves deep question marks as to the status of the Court, independent otherwise (or at least so it should be). In the final part, before the conclusions, we shall also refer to the applicability of the principle of proportionality, so much invoked in the CJEU Judgment.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:06:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0f9418e15e74ea689ab3a5c6e00916a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2068-7796
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-17T23:33:16Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj.art-b0f9418e15e74ea689ab3a5c6e00916a2024-12-02T04:23:01ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962021-05-01141534537CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISIONIonela-Alina ZORZOANĂ0PhD. Candidate, Faculty of Law, University ”Nicolae Titulescu”, (e-mail: alinazorzoana@gmail.com)This study proposes a post factum analysis (or rather a final conclusion) of the solution ruled in Case C-648 Hidroelectrica, a case that came before the Court of Justice of the European Union1 , as a preliminary question referred to by the Bucharest Tribunal , as a national court2 . The case was of real interest in the context in which the preliminary question concerned the interpretation given by a national authority to a rule of domestic law, and not to a rule of European law. Unfortunately, the solution ruled by the CJEU, predictable as of the time of establishing the oral phase in the case, was no surprise, representing a faithful copy of Hidroelectrica's request and adhered to without any reservation by the European Commission. This study shall be a critical analysis (perhaps too critical in certain places) of the reasoning of the CJEU judgment versus the point of view expressed by the European Commission and the conclusions of the Advocate General of the Court, true defenders of the operator in this case. Last but not least, an important part shall be devoted to the previous practice of the CJEU in terms of the inadmissibility of the preliminary questions and a sudden change thereof, which leaves deep question marks as to the status of the Court, independent otherwise (or at least so it should be). In the final part, before the conclusions, we shall also refer to the applicability of the principle of proportionality, so much invoked in the CJEU Judgment.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F3_public_law%252FCKS_2021_PUBLIC_LAW_023.pdftreaty on the functioning of the european unionpreliminary questioncourt of justice of the european unioncase-laweuropean commissionnational courtnational interestadvocate generalproportionality
spellingShingle Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
treaty on the functioning of the european union
preliminary question
court of justice of the european union
case-law
european commission
national court
national interest
advocate general
proportionality
title CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
title_full CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
title_fullStr CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
title_full_unstemmed CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
title_short CASE C-648/18 HIDROELECTRICA, CJEU – A PREDICTABLE DECISION
title_sort case c 648 18 hidroelectrica cjeu a predictable decision
topic treaty on the functioning of the european union
preliminary question
court of justice of the european union
case-law
european commission
national court
national interest
advocate general
proportionality
url http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2021_articles%252F3_public_law%252FCKS_2021_PUBLIC_LAW_023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ionelaalinazorzoana casec64818hidroelectricacjeuapredictabledecision