The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours
Controlling the spread of COVID-19 requires individuals to adopt preventive behaviours, but conspiracy beliefs about its origin are spreading. The aim of this paper is to better comprehend the strength of conspiracy beliefs versus objective COVID-19 information to predict people’s adherence to prote...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1325600/full |
| _version_ | 1797224217130827776 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel Pinazo-Calatayud Sonia Agut-Nieto Lorena Arahuete Rosana Peris Alfonso Barros Carolina Vázquez-Rodríguez |
| author_facet | Daniel Pinazo-Calatayud Sonia Agut-Nieto Lorena Arahuete Rosana Peris Alfonso Barros Carolina Vázquez-Rodríguez |
| author_sort | Daniel Pinazo-Calatayud |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Controlling the spread of COVID-19 requires individuals to adopt preventive behaviours, but conspiracy beliefs about its origin are spreading. The aim of this paper is to better comprehend the strength of conspiracy beliefs versus objective COVID-19 information to predict people’s adherence to protective behaviours (getting vaccinated, being tracked through APPs, and keeping social distance from infected people). Study 1 shows that COVID-19 implicit theories detected in the Pre-study were activated as independent factors that constitute people’s interpretations of the virus origin. These beliefs were related to a lesser intention to engage in preventive behaviours and a higher level of mistrust in institutional information, although some beliefs generate positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. In Study 2, conducted with a different sample, official COVID-19 information was included as an independent variable, but this new variable did not further explain results. Lastly, Study 3 consisting of both previous samples confirmed that conspiracy beliefs had a direct effect on a lesser willingness to engage in preventive actions, a higher mistrust, and positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. We conclude that objective COVID-19 information did not buffer the effect of conspiracy beliefs; they interfere with actions to prevent it by taking institutions as scapegoats or complicit with secret powers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:49:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b10e4d5cedd64902ba005621ec970a5b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:49:36Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-b10e4d5cedd64902ba005621ec970a5b2024-04-04T05:06:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-04-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.13256001325600The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behavioursDaniel Pinazo-Calatayud0Sonia Agut-Nieto1Lorena Arahuete2Rosana Peris3Alfonso Barros4Carolina Vázquez-Rodríguez5University of Jaume I, Castelló de La Plana, SpainUniversity of Jaume I, Castelló de La Plana, SpainUniversity of Jaume I, Castelló de La Plana, SpainUniversity of Jaume I, Castelló de La Plana, SpainUniversity of Jaume I, Castelló de La Plana, SpainMiguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, SpainControlling the spread of COVID-19 requires individuals to adopt preventive behaviours, but conspiracy beliefs about its origin are spreading. The aim of this paper is to better comprehend the strength of conspiracy beliefs versus objective COVID-19 information to predict people’s adherence to protective behaviours (getting vaccinated, being tracked through APPs, and keeping social distance from infected people). Study 1 shows that COVID-19 implicit theories detected in the Pre-study were activated as independent factors that constitute people’s interpretations of the virus origin. These beliefs were related to a lesser intention to engage in preventive behaviours and a higher level of mistrust in institutional information, although some beliefs generate positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. In Study 2, conducted with a different sample, official COVID-19 information was included as an independent variable, but this new variable did not further explain results. Lastly, Study 3 consisting of both previous samples confirmed that conspiracy beliefs had a direct effect on a lesser willingness to engage in preventive actions, a higher mistrust, and positive expectations about COVID-19 consequences. We conclude that objective COVID-19 information did not buffer the effect of conspiracy beliefs; they interfere with actions to prevent it by taking institutions as scapegoats or complicit with secret powers.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1325600/fullCOVID-19implicit theoriesconspiracy beliefsobjective informationpreventive behaviours |
| spellingShingle | Daniel Pinazo-Calatayud Sonia Agut-Nieto Lorena Arahuete Rosana Peris Alfonso Barros Carolina Vázquez-Rodríguez The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours Frontiers in Psychology COVID-19 implicit theories conspiracy beliefs objective information preventive behaviours |
| title | The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours |
| title_full | The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours |
| title_fullStr | The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours |
| title_full_unstemmed | The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours |
| title_short | The strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information: the case of COVID 19 preventive behaviours |
| title_sort | strength of conspiracy beliefs versus scientific information the case of covid 19 preventive behaviours |
| topic | COVID-19 implicit theories conspiracy beliefs objective information preventive behaviours |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1325600/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielpinazocalatayud thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT soniaagutnieto thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT lorenaarahuete thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT rosanaperis thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT alfonsobarros thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT carolinavazquezrodriguez thestrengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT danielpinazocalatayud strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT soniaagutnieto strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT lorenaarahuete strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT rosanaperis strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT alfonsobarros strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours AT carolinavazquezrodriguez strengthofconspiracybeliefsversusscientificinformationthecaseofcovid19preventivebehaviours |