Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya.
<h4>Background</h4>Primary healthcare (PHC) systems attain improved health outcomes and fairness and are affordable. However, the proportion of PHC spending to Total Current Health Expenditure in Kenya reduced from 63.4% in 2016/17 to 53.9% in 2020/21 while external funding reduced from...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283156 |
| _version_ | 1797843062405201920 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel Mwai Salim Hussein Agatha Olago Maureen Kimani David Njuguna Rose Njiraini Elizabeth Wangia Easter Olwanda Lilian Mwaura Wesley Rotich |
| author_facet | Daniel Mwai Salim Hussein Agatha Olago Maureen Kimani David Njuguna Rose Njiraini Elizabeth Wangia Easter Olwanda Lilian Mwaura Wesley Rotich |
| author_sort | Daniel Mwai |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Primary healthcare (PHC) systems attain improved health outcomes and fairness and are affordable. However, the proportion of PHC spending to Total Current Health Expenditure in Kenya reduced from 63.4% in 2016/17 to 53.9% in 2020/21 while external funding reduced from 28.3% (Ksh 69.4 billion) to 23.9% (Ksh 68.2 billion) over the same period. This reduction in PHC spending negatively affects PHC performance and the overall health system goals.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a cost-benefit analysis and computed costs against the economic benefits of a PHC scale-up. Activity-Based Costing (ABC) on the provider perspective was employed to estimate the incremental costs. The OneHealth Tool was used to estimate the health impact of operationalizing PHC over five years. Finally, we quantified Return on Investment (ROI) by estimating monetized DALYs based on a constant value per statistical life year (VSLY) derived from a VSL estimate.<h4>Results</h4>The total projected cost of PHC interventions in the Kenya was Ksh 1.65 trillion (USD 15,581.91 billion). Human resource was the main cost driver accounting for 75% of the total cost. PHC investments avert 64,430,316 Disability Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) and generate cost savings of Ksh. 21.5 trillion (USD 204.4 Billion) over five years. Shifting services from high-level facilities to PHC facilities generates Ksh 198.2 billion (USD 1.9 billion) and yields a benefit-cost ratio of 16:1 in 5 years. Thus, every $1 invested in PHC interventions saves up to $16 in spending on conditions like stunting, NCDs, anaemia, TB, Malaria, and maternal and child health morbidity.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Evidence of the economic benefits of continued prioritization of funding for PHC can strengthen the advocacy argument for increased domestic and external financing of PHC in Kenya. A well-resourced and functional PHC system translates to substantial health benefits with positive economic benefits. Therefore, governments and stakeholders should increase investments in PHC to accelerate economic growth. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T16:58:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b110b1e05be04631ba35e96e3e6f7ff1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T16:58:25Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-b110b1e05be04631ba35e96e3e6f7ff12023-04-21T05:34:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01183e028315610.1371/journal.pone.0283156Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya.Daniel MwaiSalim HusseinAgatha OlagoMaureen KimaniDavid NjugunaRose NjirainiElizabeth WangiaEaster OlwandaLilian MwauraWesley Rotich<h4>Background</h4>Primary healthcare (PHC) systems attain improved health outcomes and fairness and are affordable. However, the proportion of PHC spending to Total Current Health Expenditure in Kenya reduced from 63.4% in 2016/17 to 53.9% in 2020/21 while external funding reduced from 28.3% (Ksh 69.4 billion) to 23.9% (Ksh 68.2 billion) over the same period. This reduction in PHC spending negatively affects PHC performance and the overall health system goals.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a cost-benefit analysis and computed costs against the economic benefits of a PHC scale-up. Activity-Based Costing (ABC) on the provider perspective was employed to estimate the incremental costs. The OneHealth Tool was used to estimate the health impact of operationalizing PHC over five years. Finally, we quantified Return on Investment (ROI) by estimating monetized DALYs based on a constant value per statistical life year (VSLY) derived from a VSL estimate.<h4>Results</h4>The total projected cost of PHC interventions in the Kenya was Ksh 1.65 trillion (USD 15,581.91 billion). Human resource was the main cost driver accounting for 75% of the total cost. PHC investments avert 64,430,316 Disability Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) and generate cost savings of Ksh. 21.5 trillion (USD 204.4 Billion) over five years. Shifting services from high-level facilities to PHC facilities generates Ksh 198.2 billion (USD 1.9 billion) and yields a benefit-cost ratio of 16:1 in 5 years. Thus, every $1 invested in PHC interventions saves up to $16 in spending on conditions like stunting, NCDs, anaemia, TB, Malaria, and maternal and child health morbidity.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Evidence of the economic benefits of continued prioritization of funding for PHC can strengthen the advocacy argument for increased domestic and external financing of PHC in Kenya. A well-resourced and functional PHC system translates to substantial health benefits with positive economic benefits. Therefore, governments and stakeholders should increase investments in PHC to accelerate economic growth.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283156 |
| spellingShingle | Daniel Mwai Salim Hussein Agatha Olago Maureen Kimani David Njuguna Rose Njiraini Elizabeth Wangia Easter Olwanda Lilian Mwaura Wesley Rotich Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. PLoS ONE |
| title | Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. |
| title_full | Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. |
| title_fullStr | Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. |
| title_short | Investment case for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Kenya. |
| title_sort | investment case for primary health care in low and middle income countries a case study of kenya |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283156 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielmwai investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT salimhussein investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT agathaolago investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT maureenkimani investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT davidnjuguna investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT rosenjiraini investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT elizabethwangia investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT easterolwanda investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT lilianmwaura investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya AT wesleyrotich investmentcaseforprimaryhealthcareinlowandmiddleincomecountriesacasestudyofkenya |