Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section

Backgound:To determine the role of mechanical induction with cervical Foley's in reducing the rate of repeat caesarean section. Methods: In this observational study women who had previous one LSCS with vertex presentation, gestational age b/w 37-40 weeks, previous caesarean to delivery interval...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shazia Rafique et al.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/932
_version_ 1818532871438073856
author Shazia Rafique et al.,
author_facet Shazia Rafique et al.,
author_sort Shazia Rafique et al.,
collection DOAJ
description Backgound:To determine the role of mechanical induction with cervical Foley's in reducing the rate of repeat caesarean section. Methods: In this observational study women who had previous one LSCS with vertex presentation, gestational age b/w 37-40 weeks, previous caesarean to delivery interval >18 months and bishop score >5 were included.Women not consenting for mechanical Induction of labour, medical disorders like diabetes, hypertension, preterm and postdates pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, intra uterine growth retardation (IUGR) and who had an absolute indication for repeat caesarean section were excluded. Eighty patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and had properly defined indication for TOLAC were included in the study. After assessment of Bishop Score, they were induced with cervical foley’s. The primary outcome measure was Vaginal Birth After Caesarean-section (VBAC), secondary outcomes were induction to delivery interval, maternal and fetal complications, indications for LSCS, NICU admission and patient’s satisfaction. Results :A total of eighty patients were induced with cervical foley’s. Out of these patients, the successful VBAC was observed in 58 (72.5%). Among them spontaneous VBAC in 55 ( 68.8%) patients and ventouse delivery in 3( 3.8%). Emergency LSCS for different indications in 22 (27.5%), mean induction to delivery interval was 8.75 hours, Scar rupture was reported in only one ( 1.25%) , 5 (6.3% ) newborn babies were admitted in NICU,6( 7.5%) had PPH. Majority (95% ) were found satisfied. Conclusion: Mechanical induction with cervical Foley’s in patients with previous one cesarean section is a reasonable option to reduce the rate of repeat LSCS, provided there is careful selection of the cases antenatally and vigilant intrapartum monitoring.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:51:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1326d0af8914498a64d98e95dc7e24d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:51:11Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj.art-b1326d0af8914498a64d98e95dc7e24d2022-12-22T00:56:12ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702018-09-01Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean SectionShazia Rafique et al.,0Izzat Ali Shah Maternal and Child Health Centre and Wah Medical College Wah CanttBackgound:To determine the role of mechanical induction with cervical Foley's in reducing the rate of repeat caesarean section. Methods: In this observational study women who had previous one LSCS with vertex presentation, gestational age b/w 37-40 weeks, previous caesarean to delivery interval >18 months and bishop score >5 were included.Women not consenting for mechanical Induction of labour, medical disorders like diabetes, hypertension, preterm and postdates pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, intra uterine growth retardation (IUGR) and who had an absolute indication for repeat caesarean section were excluded. Eighty patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and had properly defined indication for TOLAC were included in the study. After assessment of Bishop Score, they were induced with cervical foley’s. The primary outcome measure was Vaginal Birth After Caesarean-section (VBAC), secondary outcomes were induction to delivery interval, maternal and fetal complications, indications for LSCS, NICU admission and patient’s satisfaction. Results :A total of eighty patients were induced with cervical foley’s. Out of these patients, the successful VBAC was observed in 58 (72.5%). Among them spontaneous VBAC in 55 ( 68.8%) patients and ventouse delivery in 3( 3.8%). Emergency LSCS for different indications in 22 (27.5%), mean induction to delivery interval was 8.75 hours, Scar rupture was reported in only one ( 1.25%) , 5 (6.3% ) newborn babies were admitted in NICU,6( 7.5%) had PPH. Majority (95% ) were found satisfied. Conclusion: Mechanical induction with cervical Foley’s in patients with previous one cesarean section is a reasonable option to reduce the rate of repeat LSCS, provided there is careful selection of the cases antenatally and vigilant intrapartum monitoring.https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/932Mechanical induction of labourTrial of labour after caesarean(TOLAC)Scar ruptureNICU admission
spellingShingle Shazia Rafique et al.,
Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Mechanical induction of labour
Trial of labour after caesarean(TOLAC)
Scar rupture
NICU admission
title Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
title_full Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
title_fullStr Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
title_short Outcome of Mechanical Induction of Labour in Patients with Previous One Caesarean Section
title_sort outcome of mechanical induction of labour in patients with previous one caesarean section
topic Mechanical induction of labour
Trial of labour after caesarean(TOLAC)
Scar rupture
NICU admission
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/932
work_keys_str_mv AT shaziarafiqueetal outcomeofmechanicalinductionoflabourinpatientswithpreviousonecaesareansection