Multivessel versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Background: There is uncertainty whether multivessel (MV-PCI) or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CO-PCI) should be the treatment of choice in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD). Aims: To evaluate clinical character...
Main Authors: | Tobias F. S. Pustjens, Marijke J. C. Timmermans, Saman Rasoul, Arnoud W. J. van ‘t Hof, on behalf of the PCI Registration Committee, the Cardiothoracic Surgery Registration Committee of The Netherlands Heart Registration |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/20/6144 |
Similar Items
-
Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock
by: Jing Wu, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Management of Culprit and Non-Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome
by: Gerculy Renáta, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome
by: Baker Hamilton, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Timing of Complete Revascularization in Patients with STEMI and Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Giuseppe Panuccio, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
MINOCA: The caveat of absence of coronary obstruction in myocardial infarction
by: Nousjka P.A. Vranken, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)