Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral
<b>Background:</b> The aim of the present clinical study was to compare the efficacy of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) with and without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty eight identical bila...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2010-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2010;volume=14;issue=2;spage=126;epage=131;aulast=Parimala |
| _version_ | 1818549658606108672 |
|---|---|
| author | Parimala M Mehta D |
| author_facet | Parimala M Mehta D |
| author_sort | Parimala M |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <b>Background:</b> The aim of the present clinical study was to compare the efficacy of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) with and without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty eight identical bilateral periodontal intrabony defects were selected from 14 chronic periodontitis patients. The subjects were randomly assigned to test group (BPBM+PRP) or the control group (BPBM). The clinical, radiographic, and intrasurgical (re-entry) measurements were made at baseline and at 9 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level as compared to baseline values. The probing depth reduction was 6.20±1.40 mm in BPBM and 6.60±1.43 mm for the BPBM/PRP-treated sites. The gain in clinical attachment level observed was 4.16±1.05 mm for BPBM and 4.70±0.76 mm for the BPBM/PRP group. Radiographically, there was a significant defect fill (3.83±1.01 mm) for the BPBM group and (4.04±1.77 mm) in the BPBM/PRP group. Similar trend was observed between the two groups in relation to intrasurgical parameters. <b>Conclusions:</b> The combination therapy (BPBM+PRP) showed more favorable clinical outcome in the treatment of intrabony defects than the BPBM alone group, although the mean difference between the two groups was statistically nonsignificant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:36:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b13b4bc99b964d1ab695339f28193dca |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0972-124X 0975-1580 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:36:13Z |
| publishDate | 2010-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology |
| spelling | doaj.art-b13b4bc99b964d1ab695339f28193dca2022-12-22T00:30:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X0975-15802010-01-01142126131Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineralParimala MMehta D<b>Background:</b> The aim of the present clinical study was to compare the efficacy of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) with and without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty eight identical bilateral periodontal intrabony defects were selected from 14 chronic periodontitis patients. The subjects were randomly assigned to test group (BPBM+PRP) or the control group (BPBM). The clinical, radiographic, and intrasurgical (re-entry) measurements were made at baseline and at 9 months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level as compared to baseline values. The probing depth reduction was 6.20±1.40 mm in BPBM and 6.60±1.43 mm for the BPBM/PRP-treated sites. The gain in clinical attachment level observed was 4.16±1.05 mm for BPBM and 4.70±0.76 mm for the BPBM/PRP group. Radiographically, there was a significant defect fill (3.83±1.01 mm) for the BPBM group and (4.04±1.77 mm) in the BPBM/PRP group. Similar trend was observed between the two groups in relation to intrasurgical parameters. <b>Conclusions:</b> The combination therapy (BPBM+PRP) showed more favorable clinical outcome in the treatment of intrabony defects than the BPBM alone group, although the mean difference between the two groups was statistically nonsignificant.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2010;volume=14;issue=2;spage=126;epage=131;aulast=ParimalaBonegraftsgrowth factorsplatelet rich plasmaperiodontal diseases/therapyperiodontal regenerationre-entry study |
| spellingShingle | Parimala M Mehta D Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology Bone grafts growth factors platelet rich plasma periodontal diseases/therapy periodontal regeneration re-entry study |
| title | Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of bovine porous bone mineral |
| topic | Bone grafts growth factors platelet rich plasma periodontal diseases/therapy periodontal regeneration re-entry study |
| url | http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2010;volume=14;issue=2;spage=126;epage=131;aulast=Parimala |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT parimalam comparativeevaluationofbovineporousbonemineral AT mehtad comparativeevaluationofbovineporousbonemineral |