A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate

Coal seam permeability is a critical factor in coal seam gas extraction and gas outburst control. In Australian coal mines, coal seam permeability is normally estimated using a packer test or drill stem test. In contrast, Chinese coal mines generally estimate a parameter called the “gas conductivity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qingdong Qu, Jingyu Shi, Andy Wilkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3828
_version_ 1797500058328891392
author Qingdong Qu
Jingyu Shi
Andy Wilkins
author_facet Qingdong Qu
Jingyu Shi
Andy Wilkins
author_sort Qingdong Qu
collection DOAJ
description Coal seam permeability is a critical factor in coal seam gas extraction and gas outburst control. In Australian coal mines, coal seam permeability is normally estimated using a packer test or drill stem test. In contrast, Chinese coal mines generally estimate a parameter called the “gas conductivity coefficient” by measuring natural gas flow rates from an underground borehole drilled through a coal seam. With this method, it has been frequently reported that the permeability of many Chinese coal seams is between 0.0001 mD and 0.01 mD, which is extremely low compared to that of Australian coal seams (1–100 mD). It is therefore natural to wonder how closely the Chinese method measures permeability. Resolving this question will allow knowledge and experience in outburst management to be shared between Australian and Chinese coal mines. This question is investigated by the numerical modelling of gas desorption and flow through a seam of known permeability and by using the model’s borehole gas flow rate to estimate the permeability using the Chinese method. A total of 126 simulations were run with various input reservoir parameters. The results suggest that the Chinese method estimates permeability at an accuracy of 85% to 100%, which is adequate for mine pre-drainage design and outburst control. For the high diffusion rate (e.g., high gas content and short desorption time) and low Darcy flow rates (e.g., low permeability), these errors are reduced.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:57:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b13bab7609a2419dbe6a57327af69f18
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:57:20Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-b13bab7609a2419dbe6a57327af69f182023-11-23T10:53:40ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-05-011510382810.3390/en15103828A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow RateQingdong Qu0Jingyu Shi1Andy Wilkins2CSIRO Mineral Recourses, QCAT, 1, Technology Court, Pullenvale, QLD 4069, AustraliaCSIRO Mineral Recourses, QCAT, 1, Technology Court, Pullenvale, QLD 4069, AustraliaCSIRO Mineral Recourses, QCAT, 1, Technology Court, Pullenvale, QLD 4069, AustraliaCoal seam permeability is a critical factor in coal seam gas extraction and gas outburst control. In Australian coal mines, coal seam permeability is normally estimated using a packer test or drill stem test. In contrast, Chinese coal mines generally estimate a parameter called the “gas conductivity coefficient” by measuring natural gas flow rates from an underground borehole drilled through a coal seam. With this method, it has been frequently reported that the permeability of many Chinese coal seams is between 0.0001 mD and 0.01 mD, which is extremely low compared to that of Australian coal seams (1–100 mD). It is therefore natural to wonder how closely the Chinese method measures permeability. Resolving this question will allow knowledge and experience in outburst management to be shared between Australian and Chinese coal mines. This question is investigated by the numerical modelling of gas desorption and flow through a seam of known permeability and by using the model’s borehole gas flow rate to estimate the permeability using the Chinese method. A total of 126 simulations were run with various input reservoir parameters. The results suggest that the Chinese method estimates permeability at an accuracy of 85% to 100%, which is adequate for mine pre-drainage design and outburst control. For the high diffusion rate (e.g., high gas content and short desorption time) and low Darcy flow rates (e.g., low permeability), these errors are reduced.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3828permeabilitynumerical simulationborehole radial flowgas conductivity coefficientoutburst
spellingShingle Qingdong Qu
Jingyu Shi
Andy Wilkins
A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
Energies
permeability
numerical simulation
borehole radial flow
gas conductivity coefficient
outburst
title A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
title_full A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
title_fullStr A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
title_full_unstemmed A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
title_short A Numerical Evaluation of Coal Seam Permeability Derived from Borehole Gas Flow Rate
title_sort numerical evaluation of coal seam permeability derived from borehole gas flow rate
topic permeability
numerical simulation
borehole radial flow
gas conductivity coefficient
outburst
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3828
work_keys_str_mv AT qingdongqu anumericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate
AT jingyushi anumericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate
AT andywilkins anumericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate
AT qingdongqu numericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate
AT jingyushi numericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate
AT andywilkins numericalevaluationofcoalseampermeabilityderivedfromboreholegasflowrate