Proof of a local antimagic conjecture

An antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2$ admits an antimagic labelling. Recently, two s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Haslegrave
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science 2018-06-01
Series:Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dmtcs.episciences.org/3887/pdf
_version_ 1827323763135348736
author John Haslegrave
author_facet John Haslegrave
author_sort John Haslegrave
collection DOAJ
description An antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2$ admits an antimagic labelling. Recently, two sets of authors (Arumugam, Premalatha, Ba\v{c}a \& Semani\v{c}ov\'a-Fe\v{n}ov\v{c}\'ikov\'a (2017), and Bensmail, Senhaji \& Lyngsie (2017)) independently introduced the weaker notion of a local antimagic labelling, where only adjacent vertices must be distinguished. Both sets of authors conjectured that any connected graph other than $K_2$ admits a local antimagic labelling. We prove this latter conjecture using the probabilistic method. Thus the parameter of local antimagic chromatic number, introduced by Arumugam et al., is well-defined for every connected graph other than $K_2$ .
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:58:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b156c70281ef49cdb3cb01797af39cb8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1365-8050
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:58:48Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
record_format Article
series Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
spelling doaj.art-b156c70281ef49cdb3cb01797af39cb82024-03-07T15:36:37ZengDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer ScienceDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science1365-80502018-06-01Vol. 20 no. 1Graph Theory10.23638/DMTCS-20-1-183887Proof of a local antimagic conjectureJohn HaslegraveAn antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2$ admits an antimagic labelling. Recently, two sets of authors (Arumugam, Premalatha, Ba\v{c}a \& Semani\v{c}ov\'a-Fe\v{n}ov\v{c}\'ikov\'a (2017), and Bensmail, Senhaji \& Lyngsie (2017)) independently introduced the weaker notion of a local antimagic labelling, where only adjacent vertices must be distinguished. Both sets of authors conjectured that any connected graph other than $K_2$ admits a local antimagic labelling. We prove this latter conjecture using the probabilistic method. Thus the parameter of local antimagic chromatic number, introduced by Arumugam et al., is well-defined for every connected graph other than $K_2$ .https://dmtcs.episciences.org/3887/pdfmathematics - combinatorics05c78, 05c15
spellingShingle John Haslegrave
Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
mathematics - combinatorics
05c78, 05c15
title Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
title_full Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
title_fullStr Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
title_full_unstemmed Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
title_short Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
title_sort proof of a local antimagic conjecture
topic mathematics - combinatorics
05c78, 05c15
url https://dmtcs.episciences.org/3887/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhaslegrave proofofalocalantimagicconjecture