Advance directives and the impact of timing

PRINCIPLES: Advance directives are seen as an important tool for documenting the wishes of patients who are no longer competent to make decisions in regards to their medical care. Due to their nature, approaching the subject of advance directives with a patient can be difficult for both the medica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ina Otte, Corinna Jung, Bernice Elger, Klaus Bally
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2014-09-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1908
_version_ 1797979548065726464
author Ina Otte
Corinna Jung
Bernice Elger
Klaus Bally
author_facet Ina Otte
Corinna Jung
Bernice Elger
Klaus Bally
author_sort Ina Otte
collection DOAJ
description PRINCIPLES: Advance directives are seen as an important tool for documenting the wishes of patients who are no longer competent to make decisions in regards to their medical care. Due to their nature, approaching the subject of advance directives with a patient can be difficult for both the medical care provider and the patient. This paper focuses on general practitioners’ perspectives regarding the timing at which this discussion should take place, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the different moments. METHODS: In 2013, 23 semi-structured face-to-face interviews were performed with Swiss general practitioners. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In our sample, 23 general practitioners provided different options that they felt were appropriate moments: either (a) when the patient is still healthy, (b) when illness becomes predominant, or (c) when a patient has been transferred to a long-term care facility. Furthermore, general practitioners reported uncertainty and discomfort regarding initiating the discussion. CONCLUSION: The distinct approaches, perspectives and rationales show that there is no well-defined or “right” moment. However, participants often associated advance directives with death. This link caused discomfort and uncertainty, which led to hesitation and delay on the part of general practitioners. Therefore we recommend further training on how to professionally initiate a conversation about advance directives. Furthermore, based on our results and experience, we recommend an early approach with healthy patients paired with later regular updates as it seems to be the most effective way to inform patients about their end-of-life care options.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:40:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1590281e5624e589494f4fd81a100e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:40:24Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-b1590281e5624e589494f4fd81a100e02022-12-22T04:42:32ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972014-09-01144394010.4414/smw.2014.14035Advance directives and the impact of timingIna OtteCorinna JungBernice ElgerKlaus Bally PRINCIPLES: Advance directives are seen as an important tool for documenting the wishes of patients who are no longer competent to make decisions in regards to their medical care. Due to their nature, approaching the subject of advance directives with a patient can be difficult for both the medical care provider and the patient. This paper focuses on general practitioners’ perspectives regarding the timing at which this discussion should take place, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the different moments. METHODS: In 2013, 23 semi-structured face-to-face interviews were performed with Swiss general practitioners. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In our sample, 23 general practitioners provided different options that they felt were appropriate moments: either (a) when the patient is still healthy, (b) when illness becomes predominant, or (c) when a patient has been transferred to a long-term care facility. Furthermore, general practitioners reported uncertainty and discomfort regarding initiating the discussion. CONCLUSION: The distinct approaches, perspectives and rationales show that there is no well-defined or “right” moment. However, participants often associated advance directives with death. This link caused discomfort and uncertainty, which led to hesitation and delay on the part of general practitioners. Therefore we recommend further training on how to professionally initiate a conversation about advance directives. Furthermore, based on our results and experience, we recommend an early approach with healthy patients paired with later regular updates as it seems to be the most effective way to inform patients about their end-of-life care options. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1908primary health caregeneral practiceadvance directivesdecision makingadvance care planningpatient-centred care
spellingShingle Ina Otte
Corinna Jung
Bernice Elger
Klaus Bally
Advance directives and the impact of timing
Swiss Medical Weekly
primary health care
general practice
advance directives
decision making
advance care planning
patient-centred care
title Advance directives and the impact of timing
title_full Advance directives and the impact of timing
title_fullStr Advance directives and the impact of timing
title_full_unstemmed Advance directives and the impact of timing
title_short Advance directives and the impact of timing
title_sort advance directives and the impact of timing
topic primary health care
general practice
advance directives
decision making
advance care planning
patient-centred care
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1908
work_keys_str_mv AT inaotte advancedirectivesandtheimpactoftiming
AT corinnajung advancedirectivesandtheimpactoftiming
AT berniceelger advancedirectivesandtheimpactoftiming
AT klausbally advancedirectivesandtheimpactoftiming