Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Primary health care teams are key to the delivery of care for patients with advanced cancer during the last year of life. The Gold Standards Framework is proposed as a mechanism for coordinating and guiding identification, assessment, and support. There are still considerable var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Hackett, Lucy Ziegler, Mary Godfrey, Robbie Foy, Michael I. Bennett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-018-0861-z
_version_ 1818247581280501760
author Julia Hackett
Lucy Ziegler
Mary Godfrey
Robbie Foy
Michael I. Bennett
author_facet Julia Hackett
Lucy Ziegler
Mary Godfrey
Robbie Foy
Michael I. Bennett
author_sort Julia Hackett
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Primary health care teams are key to the delivery of care for patients with advanced cancer during the last year of life. The Gold Standards Framework is proposed as a mechanism for coordinating and guiding identification, assessment, and support. There are still considerable variations in practice despite its introduction. The aim of this qualitative study is to improve understanding of variations in practice through exploring the perspectives and experiences of members of primary health care teams involved in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and non-participatory observations involving 67 members of primary health care teams providing palliative care. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. Results We identified distinct differences in the drivers and barriers of community advanced cancer care coordination, which relate to identification and management, and access to effective pain management, and go some way to understanding variations in practice. These include proactive identification processes, time and resource pressures, unclear roles and responsibilities, poor multidisciplinary working, and inflexible models for referral and prescribing. These provide valuable insight into how professionals work together and independently within an infrastructure that can both support and hinder the provision of effective community palliative care. Conclusions Whilst the GSF is a guide for good practice, alone it is not a mechanism for change. Rather it provides a framework for describing quality of practice that was already occurring. Consequently, there will continue to be variations in practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T15:06:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b15cdcf996d34a97b01f12c3060de25d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2296
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T15:06:59Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Family Practice
spelling doaj.art-b15cdcf996d34a97b01f12c3060de25d2022-12-22T00:20:43ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962018-11-0119111010.1186/s12875-018-0861-zPrimary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative studyJulia Hackett0Lucy Ziegler1Mary Godfrey2Robbie Foy3Michael I. Bennett4Martin House Research Centre, Social Policy Research Unit, University of YorkAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal InfirmaryAcademic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsAbstract Background Primary health care teams are key to the delivery of care for patients with advanced cancer during the last year of life. The Gold Standards Framework is proposed as a mechanism for coordinating and guiding identification, assessment, and support. There are still considerable variations in practice despite its introduction. The aim of this qualitative study is to improve understanding of variations in practice through exploring the perspectives and experiences of members of primary health care teams involved in the care of patients with advanced cancer. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and non-participatory observations involving 67 members of primary health care teams providing palliative care. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. Results We identified distinct differences in the drivers and barriers of community advanced cancer care coordination, which relate to identification and management, and access to effective pain management, and go some way to understanding variations in practice. These include proactive identification processes, time and resource pressures, unclear roles and responsibilities, poor multidisciplinary working, and inflexible models for referral and prescribing. These provide valuable insight into how professionals work together and independently within an infrastructure that can both support and hinder the provision of effective community palliative care. Conclusions Whilst the GSF is a guide for good practice, alone it is not a mechanism for change. Rather it provides a framework for describing quality of practice that was already occurring. Consequently, there will continue to be variations in practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-018-0861-zPrimary carePalliative careGold standards frameworkQualitative researchPatient care
spellingShingle Julia Hackett
Lucy Ziegler
Mary Godfrey
Robbie Foy
Michael I. Bennett
Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
BMC Family Practice
Primary care
Palliative care
Gold standards framework
Qualitative research
Patient care
title Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
title_full Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
title_short Primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community: a qualitative study
title_sort primary palliative care team perspectives on coordinating and managing people with advanced cancer in the community a qualitative study
topic Primary care
Palliative care
Gold standards framework
Qualitative research
Patient care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-018-0861-z
work_keys_str_mv AT juliahackett primarypalliativecareteamperspectivesoncoordinatingandmanagingpeoplewithadvancedcancerinthecommunityaqualitativestudy
AT lucyziegler primarypalliativecareteamperspectivesoncoordinatingandmanagingpeoplewithadvancedcancerinthecommunityaqualitativestudy
AT marygodfrey primarypalliativecareteamperspectivesoncoordinatingandmanagingpeoplewithadvancedcancerinthecommunityaqualitativestudy
AT robbiefoy primarypalliativecareteamperspectivesoncoordinatingandmanagingpeoplewithadvancedcancerinthecommunityaqualitativestudy
AT michaelibennett primarypalliativecareteamperspectivesoncoordinatingandmanagingpeoplewithadvancedcancerinthecommunityaqualitativestudy