The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare demographic characteristics, operative data, and complication rates of women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy by the skeleton uterus technique (Skeleton-TLH) with those of women who underwent TLH by the standard technique (Standard-TLH) in a univ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adnan Orhan, Isil Kasapoglu, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Oguzhan Yuruk, Gurkan Uncu, Kemal Ozerkan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=67;epage=72;aulast=Orhan
_version_ 1819212407405281280
author Adnan Orhan
Isil Kasapoglu
Gokhan Ocakoglu
Oguzhan Yuruk
Gurkan Uncu
Kemal Ozerkan
author_facet Adnan Orhan
Isil Kasapoglu
Gokhan Ocakoglu
Oguzhan Yuruk
Gurkan Uncu
Kemal Ozerkan
author_sort Adnan Orhan
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study is to compare demographic characteristics, operative data, and complication rates of women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy by the skeleton uterus technique (Skeleton-TLH) with those of women who underwent TLH by the standard technique (Standard-TLH) in a university teaching and research hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 932 laparoscopic hysterectomies in a university teaching and research hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, and complications were recorded and compared for the two techniques. Results: In total, 932 laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed, 454 by Skeleton-TLH and 478 by Standard-TLH. The general demographic characteristics of the patients were similar; only gravida and parity were statistically significantly different between the groups (P < 0.001). Based on the primary outcomes (the operative data), total anesthesia time and main operation time were similar in the two groups. Estimated blood loss was statistically significantly lower in the Skeleton-TLH group than in the Standard-TLH group. Hospital stay was longer for the Skeleton-TLH group, and specimen weight was heavier. The secondary outcome was the complication rate. There were no differences between the Skeleton-TLH and Standard-TLH groups in the rates of all minor and major complications. Conclusion: TLH with the skeleton uterus technique is feasible and safe, especially for advanced pelvic surgeons. This technique not only provides retroperitoneal access to the pelvic spaces and good anatomical visibility; but it also delivers a safer laparoscopic hysterectomy by clamping the uterine arteries and monitoring the ureter throughout the operation.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:42:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b15f2fdec40641f9b713e28d84cf220e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2213-3070
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:42:29Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
spelling doaj.art-b15f2fdec40641f9b713e28d84cf220e2022-12-21T17:56:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy2213-30702019-01-0182677210.4103/GMIT.GMIT_125_18The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomiesAdnan OrhanIsil KasapogluGokhan OcakogluOguzhan YurukGurkan UncuKemal OzerkanAim: The aim of this study is to compare demographic characteristics, operative data, and complication rates of women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy by the skeleton uterus technique (Skeleton-TLH) with those of women who underwent TLH by the standard technique (Standard-TLH) in a university teaching and research hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 932 laparoscopic hysterectomies in a university teaching and research hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, and complications were recorded and compared for the two techniques. Results: In total, 932 laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed, 454 by Skeleton-TLH and 478 by Standard-TLH. The general demographic characteristics of the patients were similar; only gravida and parity were statistically significantly different between the groups (P < 0.001). Based on the primary outcomes (the operative data), total anesthesia time and main operation time were similar in the two groups. Estimated blood loss was statistically significantly lower in the Skeleton-TLH group than in the Standard-TLH group. Hospital stay was longer for the Skeleton-TLH group, and specimen weight was heavier. The secondary outcome was the complication rate. There were no differences between the Skeleton-TLH and Standard-TLH groups in the rates of all minor and major complications. Conclusion: TLH with the skeleton uterus technique is feasible and safe, especially for advanced pelvic surgeons. This technique not only provides retroperitoneal access to the pelvic spaces and good anatomical visibility; but it also delivers a safer laparoscopic hysterectomy by clamping the uterine arteries and monitoring the ureter throughout the operation.http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=67;epage=72;aulast=OrhanLaparoscopic hysterectomyminimally invasive techniquesSkeleton uterus technique
spellingShingle Adnan Orhan
Isil Kasapoglu
Gokhan Ocakoglu
Oguzhan Yuruk
Gurkan Uncu
Kemal Ozerkan
The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
minimally invasive techniques
Skeleton uterus technique
title The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
title_full The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
title_fullStr The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
title_short The comparison of outcomes between the “skeleton uterus technique” and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
title_sort comparison of outcomes between the skeleton uterus technique and conventional techniques in laparoscopic hysterectomies
topic Laparoscopic hysterectomy
minimally invasive techniques
Skeleton uterus technique
url http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=67;epage=72;aulast=Orhan
work_keys_str_mv AT adnanorhan thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT isilkasapoglu thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT gokhanocakoglu thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT oguzhanyuruk thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT gurkanuncu thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT kemalozerkan thecomparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT adnanorhan comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT isilkasapoglu comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT gokhanocakoglu comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT oguzhanyuruk comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT gurkanuncu comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies
AT kemalozerkan comparisonofoutcomesbetweentheskeletonuterustechniqueandconventionaltechniquesinlaparoscopichysterectomies