Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?

Aim: To compare open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy (OSP) without insertion of suprapubic cystostomy, OSP with insertion of cystostomy, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: A total of 104 patients with an indication for prostatectomy were retrospectively a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbas Hassanpour, Mohammad Mehid Hosseini, Alireza Yousefi, Reza Inaloo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=213;epage=217;aulast=Hassanpour
_version_ 1828530280649981952
author Abbas Hassanpour
Mohammad Mehid Hosseini
Alireza Yousefi
Reza Inaloo
author_facet Abbas Hassanpour
Mohammad Mehid Hosseini
Alireza Yousefi
Reza Inaloo
author_sort Abbas Hassanpour
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To compare open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy (OSP) without insertion of suprapubic cystostomy, OSP with insertion of cystostomy, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: A total of 104 patients with an indication for prostatectomy were retrospectively assigned to TURP (group 1), OSP with cystostomy (group 2), and OSP without cystostomy (group 3). They were evaluated for length of the operation, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications, hemoglobin drop, changes of blood pressure, and intraoperative blood loss. Results: Mean age was 67.2 ± 8.7 in group 1, 73.3 ± 8.4 in group 2, and 74.0 ± 5.7 in group 3. Prostatic volume was 35.9 ± 13.8, 74.1 ± 33.8, and 74.3 ± 31.8 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in prostatic volume between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.99), but in group 1 it was lesser than groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.00). Length of the operation was 1.2 ± 0.2 in group 3 and 1.1 ± 0.2 in group 2, without a significant difference (P = 0.45). Length of hospital stay in group 3 (2.3 ± 0.4 days) was lesser than that in group 2 (2.6 ± 0.7) (P = 0.01). The amount of hemoglobin drop was 1.1 ± 0.9 in group 1, 1.1 ± 0.7 in group 2, and 1.4 ± 0.91 in group 3 without a significant difference between all groups. The amount of bleeding during operation was 173 ± 103 in group 2 and 161 ± 78 in group 3 (P = 0.98). Conclusion: OSP without insertion of cystostomy tube is a relatively safe method; however, larger studies are needed. It is also comparable to TURP in terms of postoperative efficacy and complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T22:20:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1618afe797a4a00b196688fb6a21de9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T22:20:57Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Urology Annals
spelling doaj.art-b1618afe797a4a00b196688fb6a21de92022-12-22T00:48:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342016-01-018221321710.4103/0974-7796.162245Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?Abbas HassanpourMohammad Mehid HosseiniAlireza YousefiReza InalooAim: To compare open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy (OSP) without insertion of suprapubic cystostomy, OSP with insertion of cystostomy, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: A total of 104 patients with an indication for prostatectomy were retrospectively assigned to TURP (group 1), OSP with cystostomy (group 2), and OSP without cystostomy (group 3). They were evaluated for length of the operation, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications, hemoglobin drop, changes of blood pressure, and intraoperative blood loss. Results: Mean age was 67.2 ± 8.7 in group 1, 73.3 ± 8.4 in group 2, and 74.0 ± 5.7 in group 3. Prostatic volume was 35.9 ± 13.8, 74.1 ± 33.8, and 74.3 ± 31.8 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in prostatic volume between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.99), but in group 1 it was lesser than groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.00). Length of the operation was 1.2 ± 0.2 in group 3 and 1.1 ± 0.2 in group 2, without a significant difference (P = 0.45). Length of hospital stay in group 3 (2.3 ± 0.4 days) was lesser than that in group 2 (2.6 ± 0.7) (P = 0.01). The amount of hemoglobin drop was 1.1 ± 0.9 in group 1, 1.1 ± 0.7 in group 2, and 1.4 ± 0.91 in group 3 without a significant difference between all groups. The amount of bleeding during operation was 173 ± 103 in group 2 and 161 ± 78 in group 3 (P = 0.98). Conclusion: OSP without insertion of cystostomy tube is a relatively safe method; however, larger studies are needed. It is also comparable to TURP in terms of postoperative efficacy and complications.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=213;epage=217;aulast=HassanpourCystostomy, prostate, prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate
spellingShingle Abbas Hassanpour
Mohammad Mehid Hosseini
Alireza Yousefi
Reza Inaloo
Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
Urology Annals
Cystostomy, prostate, prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate
title Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
title_full Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
title_fullStr Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
title_full_unstemmed Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
title_short Cystostomy–free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy: Is it a safe method?
title_sort cystostomy free open suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy is it a safe method
topic Cystostomy, prostate, prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2016;volume=8;issue=2;spage=213;epage=217;aulast=Hassanpour
work_keys_str_mv AT abbashassanpour cystostomyfreeopensuprapubictransvesicalprostatectomyisitasafemethod
AT mohammadmehidhosseini cystostomyfreeopensuprapubictransvesicalprostatectomyisitasafemethod
AT alirezayousefi cystostomyfreeopensuprapubictransvesicalprostatectomyisitasafemethod
AT rezainaloo cystostomyfreeopensuprapubictransvesicalprostatectomyisitasafemethod