Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ?
This theoretical paper questions the critical function of evaluation for heuristic and praxeological aims of participatory research. In continuation of previous publications, it presents a model for the evaluation of participatory research from the point of view more specifically of the referentiali...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Université de Provence
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Questions Vives |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4804 |
| _version_ | 1818667749386223616 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucie Mottier Lopez |
| author_facet | Lucie Mottier Lopez |
| author_sort | Lucie Mottier Lopez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This theoretical paper questions the critical function of evaluation for heuristic and praxeological aims of participatory research. In continuation of previous publications, it presents a model for the evaluation of participatory research from the point of view more specifically of the referentialization and normalization processes involved. The article underlines the prescriptive or descriptive nature of normalization at work in a dialectical relationship between referents and referees, and always in relation to acting situated contexts. It takes the example of the double likelihood criterion associated with collaborative research to test theoretical modelling. The evaluation takes the form of surveys; it is expressed in the form of questions that echo indeterminate situations around the double social relevance of the research, the double methodological rigour and the double fecundity of the results. The article shows that some surveys are specific to the heuristic or praxeological aim of participatory and collaborative research; others also ask to investigate the articulation between the two aims that can be mutually enriching. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:25:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b1843b96d820444e81e7e6eb5bd7827e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1635-4079 1775-433X |
| language | fra |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:25:22Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Université de Provence |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Questions Vives |
| spelling | doaj.art-b1843b96d820444e81e7e6eb5bd7827e2022-12-21T22:00:18ZfraUniversité de ProvenceQuestions Vives1635-40791775-433X2020-12-013310.4000/questionsvives.4804Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ?Lucie Mottier LopezThis theoretical paper questions the critical function of evaluation for heuristic and praxeological aims of participatory research. In continuation of previous publications, it presents a model for the evaluation of participatory research from the point of view more specifically of the referentialization and normalization processes involved. The article underlines the prescriptive or descriptive nature of normalization at work in a dialectical relationship between referents and referees, and always in relation to acting situated contexts. It takes the example of the double likelihood criterion associated with collaborative research to test theoretical modelling. The evaluation takes the form of surveys; it is expressed in the form of questions that echo indeterminate situations around the double social relevance of the research, the double methodological rigour and the double fecundity of the results. The article shows that some surveys are specific to the heuristic or praxeological aim of participatory and collaborative research; others also ask to investigate the articulation between the two aims that can be mutually enriching.http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4804evaluationnormalizationparticipative researchreferentializationsurvey |
| spellingShingle | Lucie Mottier Lopez Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? Questions Vives evaluation normalization participative research referentialization survey |
| title | Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? |
| title_full | Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? |
| title_fullStr | Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? |
| title_short | Penser l’évaluation des recherches participatives en termes d’enquêtes : quels rapports avec les visées heuristique et praxéologique ? |
| title_sort | penser l evaluation des recherches participatives en termes d enquetes quels rapports avec les visees heuristique et praxeologique |
| topic | evaluation normalization participative research referentialization survey |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/4804 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT luciemottierlopez penserlevaluationdesrecherchesparticipativesentermesdenquetesquelsrapportsaveclesviseesheuristiqueetpraxeologique |