Is typifying systematic reviews and meta-analysis as the top on the ladder justified?
A large number—possibly the large majority—of systematic reviews and meta-analyses produced to date may not be useful for various reasons. This article though not ruling out the usefulness of these, is raising concerns on the way these are conducted or intended for in terms of outcomes.
Main Authors: | Sunil K Raina, Raman Kumar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2022;volume=11;issue=3;spage=819;epage=820;aulast=Raina |
Similar Items
-
Justifying the design and selection of literacy and thinking tools
by: David Whitehead
Published: (2008-10-01) -
Justifying the design and selection of literacy and thinking tools
by: David Whitehead
Published: (2008-10-01) -
Justified Representation for Perpetual Voting
by: Laurent Bulteau, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Stages of Historical Development of the Justifiable Defence Institute in the Criminal Law of Post Revolutionary Russia
by: E. I. Buyevich
Published: (2013-06-01) -
An introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analyses
by: Shripada C Rao
Published: (2023-01-01)